Does emission trading lead to carbon leakage in China? Direction and channel identifications

被引:67
|
作者
Zhou, Bo [1 ]
Zhang, Cheng [2 ]
Wang, Qunwei [1 ]
Zhou, Dequn [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 211106, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
来源
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS | 2020年 / 132卷 / 132期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Emission trading; Carbon leakage direction; Carbon leakage channel; Shift-share method; Difference-in-difference-in-differences model; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; EU-ETS; MARKET-EFFICIENCY; CLIMATE POLICY; IMPACT; DECOMPOSITION; INDUSTRY; COMPETITIVENESS; POLLUTION; TRANSFERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2020.110090
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Unilateral emission trading may lead to carbon leakage. The leakage direction and channel are critical to multilateral emission mitigation. Despite the increasing number of investigations into the carbon leakage induced by emission trading, there is a lack of empirical research on the specific leakage channels related to the emission trading market. This paper develops a difference-in-difference-in-differences model to identify carbon leakage directions in emission trading pilots in China. The issue of whether market participation and industrial transfer are the specific leakage channels related to emission trading is also examined. Emission trading pilots lead to reverse carbon leakage, which moves from the non-pilot region to the pilot region. Market participation and industrial transfer are confirmed to be the specific leakage channels in emission trading. Of the two channels, market participation is the one that determines the reverse direction.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of carbon emission trading on urban green innovation: empirical evidence from China's carbon emission trading pilot policy
    Tian, Kun
    Zhai, Duanqiang
    Han, Shuo
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2024, 12
  • [42] Does Carbon Emission Trading Affect China's Green Innovation? An Exploration from the Perspective of the Enterprise Lifecycle
    Gao, Cuiyun
    Li, Xin
    Hou, Junjie
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (23)
  • [43] Does China's policy of carbon emission trading deliver sulfur dioxide reduction co-benefits?
    Po Kou
    Ying Han
    Xiaoyuan Qi
    Yuanxian Li
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022, 24 : 6224 - 6245
  • [44] How does the energy-consuming rights trading policy affect China's carbon emission intensity?
    Wang, Kaike
    Su, Xuewei
    Wang, Shuhong
    ENERGY, 2023, 276
  • [45] Does China's policy of carbon emission trading deliver sulfur dioxide reduction co-benefits?
    Kou, Po
    Han, Ying
    Qi, Xiaoyuan
    Li, Yuanxian
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (05) : 6224 - 6245
  • [46] Does carbon emission trading policy induce financialization of non-financial firms? Evidence from China
    Zhang, Xiaoliang
    Zheng, Xiaojia
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 131
  • [47] Does the Carbon Emission Trading Policy Promote Foreign Direct Investment?: A Quasi-Experiment From China
    Shao, Wei
    Yu, Xiaobo
    Chen, Ziqi
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [48] Carbon mitigation effect of emission trading product: Perspective from intra-industry carbon leakage
    Zhou, Kaiguo
    Guan, Zihuan
    Lian, Yujun
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 140
  • [49] Does carbon emission trading system induce enterprises' green innovation?
    Deng, Haiyan
    Zhang, Wenjia
    Liu, Dan
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2023, 86
  • [50] Towards green development: does carbon emission trading policy matter?
    Cai, Wugan
    Xu, Fengru
    Lin, Xiaowen
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2024,