Task familiarity and contextual cues predict hypothetical bias in a meta-analysis of stated preference studies

被引:49
|
作者
Schlaepfer, Felix [1 ,2 ]
Fischhoff, Baruch [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Fed Inst Technol ETH, Inst Environm Decis, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Kalaidos Univ Appl Sci, Dept Econ & Management, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Consistency; Constructed preferences; Contingent valuation; Hypothetical bias; Meta-analysis; Stated preferences; Validity; CONTINGENT VALUATION; VOTING-BEHAVIOR; ELICITATION; AUCTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.016
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Traditional stated preference theory does not provide useful guidance on hypothetical bias because the bias lies outside the theory. Not surprisingly, meta-analyses using variables from the theory have not revealed consistent patterns of bias. We find that these models are substantially improved by including two additional variables drawn from positive research on choice behavior. These results lead us to recommend survey procedures that address these concerns. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 47
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation
    Murphy, JJ
    Allen, PG
    Stevens, TH
    Weatherhead, D
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2005, 30 (03): : 313 - 325
  • [2] A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation
    James J. Murphy
    P. Geoffrey Allen
    Thomas H. Stevens
    Darryl Weatherhead
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2005, 30 : 313 - 325
  • [3] An addendum to: a meta-analysis of hypothethical bias in stated preference valuation
    Stefani, Gianluca
    Scarpa, Riccardo
    Lombardi, Ginevra V.
    BIO-BASED AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2014, 3 (02): : 175 - 184
  • [4] Empirical Analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated-Preference Experiments
    Tang, Li
    Luo, Xia
    GREEN INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 419 : 447 - 463
  • [5] WHAT'S TO KNOW ABOUT HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN STATED PREFERENCE VALUATION STUDIES?
    Loomis, John
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2011, 25 (02) : 363 - 370
  • [6] International meta-analysis of stated preference studies of transportation noise nuisance
    Bristow, Abigail L.
    Wardman, Mark
    Chintakayala, V. Phani Kumar
    TRANSPORTATION, 2015, 42 (01) : 71 - 100
  • [7] International meta-analysis of stated preference studies of transportation noise nuisance
    Abigail L. Bristow
    Mark Wardman
    V. Phani Kumar Chintakayala
    Transportation, 2015, 42 : 71 - 100
  • [8] UNDERSTANDING HYPOTHETICAL BIAS: AN ENHANCED META-ANALYSIS
    Penn, Jerrod M.
    Hu, Wuyang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 100 (04) : 1186 - 1206
  • [9] Valuation of travel time reliability in freight transportation: A review and meta-analysis of stated preference studies
    Shams, Kollol
    Asgari, Hamidreza
    Jin, Xia
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 102 : 228 - 243
  • [10] The social costs of pesticides: a meta-analysis of the experimental and stated preference literature
    Rufo, Elvia
    Brouwer, Roy
    van Beukering, Pieter
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):