Evaluation of the fishbone model in simulating the seismic response of multistory reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames

被引:18
|
作者
Qu Zhe [1 ]
Gong Ting [2 ]
Li Qiqi [1 ]
Wang Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] China Earthquake Adm, Key Lab Earthquake Engn & Engn Vibrat, Inst Engn Mech, Shacheng 065201, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] China Architecture Design & Res Grp, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
fishbone model; reinforced concrete frame; strong column-weak beam; column-beam stiffness ratio; incremental dynamic analysis; EARTHQUAKE; BUILDINGS; DEMANDS;
D O I
10.1007/s11803-019-0506-9
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The fishbone model is a simplified numerical model for moment-resisting frames that is capable of modelling the effects of column-beam strength and stiffness ratios. The applicability of the fishbone model in simulating the seismic responses of reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames of different sets of column-beam strength and stiffness ratios are evaluated through nonlinear static, dynamic and incremental dynamic analysis on six prototype buildings of 4-, 8- and 12-stories. The results show that the fishbone model is practically accurate enough for reinforced concrete frames, although the assumption of equal joint rotation does not hold in all cases. In addition to the ground motion characteristics and the number of stories in the structures, the accuracy of the model also varies with the column-beam stiffness and strength ratios. The model performs better for strong column-weak beam frames, in which the lateral drift patterns are better controlled by the continuous stiffness provided by the strong columns. When the inelastic deformation is large, the accuracy of the model may be subjected to large record-to-record variability. This is especially the case for frames of weak columns.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 330
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Seismic performance of dual steel moment-resisting frames
    Dubina, D
    Stratan, A
    De Matteis, G
    Landolfo, R
    BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, 2000, : 569 - 576
  • [32] Seismic upgrading of multistory steel moment-resisting frames by installing shape memory alloy braces: Design method and performance evaluation
    Qiu, Canxing
    Zhao, Xingnan
    Zhu, Songye
    STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2020, 27 (09):
  • [33] SSI effects on seismic demand of reinforced concrete moment resisting frames
    Tomeo, Romeo
    Pitilakis, Dimitris
    Bilotta, Antonio
    Nigro, Emidio
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 173 : 559 - 572
  • [34] Seismic Response of 20-Story-Tall Reinforced-Concrete Special Moment-Resisting Frames Designed with Current Code Provisions
    Visnjic, Tea
    Panagiotou, Marios
    Moehle, Jack P.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2015, 31 (02) : 869 - 893
  • [35] SEISMIC MECHANISM OF STEEL MOMENT-RESISTING FRAMES WITH REINFORCED BEAM-COLUMN CONNECTIONS
    Wang, Yu-Tian
    Wang, Yan
    Jiang, Fu-Xiang
    Mao, Hui
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, VOL I AND II, 2010, : 2001 - 2007
  • [36] Seismic performance evaluation of moment-resisting steel frames with different levels of ductility
    Daneshvar, H.
    Driver, R. G.
    STESSA 2009 - BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, 2009, : 411 - 416
  • [37] Seismic design and evaluation of steel moment-resisting frames with compressed elastomer dampers
    Karavasilis, Theodore L.
    Sause, Richard
    Ricles, James M.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2012, 41 (03): : 411 - 429
  • [39] Damage evaluation of lightly reinforced concrete walls in moment resisting frames under seismic loading
    Yuniarsyah, Eko
    Kono, Susumu
    Tani, Masanori
    Taleb, Rafik
    Sugimoto, Kuniyoshi
    Mukai, Tomohisa
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2017, 132 : 349 - 371
  • [40] Seismic optimization design for uniform damage of reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames using consecutive modal pushover analysis
    Bai, Jiulin
    Jin, Shuangshuang
    Zhang, Chuan
    Ou, Jinping
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 19 (08) : 1313 - 1327