Prospect Theory for joint time and money consequences in risk and ambiguity

被引:38
|
作者
Kemel, Emmanuel [1 ,2 ]
Paraschiv, Corina [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 01, F-44000 Nantes, France
[2] Cerema, F-44000 Nantes, France
[3] Univ Paris 05, F-78351 Jouy En Josas, France
[4] GREGHEC, F-78351 Jouy En Josas, France
关键词
Prospect theory; Risk; Ambiguity; Multi attribute decisions; Real incentives; Time; EXPECTED UTILITY-THEORY; TRAVEL-TIME; INFORMATION; EXPERIENCE; VARIABILITY; PREFERENCES; DECISIONS; ATTITUDE; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.trb.2013.07.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Transport users face complex decisions. Not only are the consequences of their choices uncertain, but they generally involve several attributes, such as time and money. Time-money tradeoffs have been studied in depth in transport economics, and research is now paying increasing attention to the role of uncertainty and information in transport decisions. This paper aims to measure the impact of uncertainty and information on multi-attribute decisions using Prospect Theory. In doing so, the study makes two contributions to transportation literature: one methodological and the other empirical. First, we propose a fast and tractable method for measuring Prospect Theory parameters that capture attitudes towards probabilities (probability weighting function) and attitudes towards losses (loss aversion). The elicitation method does not require the elicitation of the utility function. This makes it particularly suitable in complex multi-attribute decisions where the shape of the utility function is unknown. Second, we present the results of an experiment that uses the proposed method to measure, at the individual level, probability weighting in decisions involving joint time and money consequences in two decision contexts: risk (where probabilities are given) and ambiguity (where the probability distribution is unknown). An experimental setup that exposes subjects to real gains and losses for money and time has been built for this purpose. We observe inverse S-shaped probability weighting and loss aversion for risk. Probability weighting is even more pronounced in ambiguity, where subjects do not have precise information about the probability distribution. We explain how these results and the analysis of ambiguity attitudes in general can offer a better understanding of travelers' route or transport mode choices. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 95
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prospect Theory: a Global Income Elasticity for Disaster Risk
    Victorio, Antong
    INTERNATIONAL ADVANCES IN ECONOMIC RESEARCH, 2018, 24 (01) : 105 - 106
  • [42] Risk assessment based on prospect theory for groundwater protection
    Shih, CS
    Arroyo, GA
    Doro-on, AM
    Proceedings of the World Engineers' Convention 2004: Vol D, Environment Protection and Disaster Mitigation, 2004, : 374 - 377
  • [43] Prospect and Theory of GNSS Coordinate Time Series Analysis
    Jiang W.
    Wang K.
    Li Z.
    Zhou X.
    Ma Y.
    Ma J.
    2018, Editorial Board of Medical Journal of Wuhan University (43): : 2112 - 2123
  • [44] One-period pricing strategy of ‘money doctors’ under cumulative prospect theory
    Liurui Deng
    Zilan Liu
    Portuguese Economic Journal, 2017, 16 : 113 - 144
  • [45] A parameter-free analysis of the utility of money for the general population under prospect theory
    Booij, Adam S.
    van de Kuilen, Gijs
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 30 (04) : 651 - 666
  • [46] John Maynard Keynes, Joan Robinson and the prospect theory approach to money wage determination
    McDonald, Ian M.
    METROECONOMICA, 2019, 70 (01) : 45 - 67
  • [47] One-period pricing strategy of `money doctors' under cumulative prospect theory
    Deng, Liurui
    Liu, Zilan
    PORTUGUESE ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2017, 16 (02) : 113 - 144
  • [48] Resolution of an ambiguity in dynamo theory and its consequences for back-reaction studies
    Blackman, EG
    Field, GB
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 521 (02): : 597 - 601
  • [49] Prospect theory and utility theory: Temporary versus permanent attitude toward risk
    Levy, Haim
    Wiener, Zvi
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2013, 68 : 1 - 23
  • [50] Clarifying the relationship between prospect theory and risk-sensitive foraging theory
    Houston, Alasdair I.
    Fawcett, Tim W.
    Mallpress, Dave E. W.
    McNamara, John M.
    EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2014, 35 (06) : 502 - 507