Prospect Theory for joint time and money consequences in risk and ambiguity

被引:38
|
作者
Kemel, Emmanuel [1 ,2 ]
Paraschiv, Corina [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 01, F-44000 Nantes, France
[2] Cerema, F-44000 Nantes, France
[3] Univ Paris 05, F-78351 Jouy En Josas, France
[4] GREGHEC, F-78351 Jouy En Josas, France
关键词
Prospect theory; Risk; Ambiguity; Multi attribute decisions; Real incentives; Time; EXPECTED UTILITY-THEORY; TRAVEL-TIME; INFORMATION; EXPERIENCE; VARIABILITY; PREFERENCES; DECISIONS; ATTITUDE; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.trb.2013.07.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Transport users face complex decisions. Not only are the consequences of their choices uncertain, but they generally involve several attributes, such as time and money. Time-money tradeoffs have been studied in depth in transport economics, and research is now paying increasing attention to the role of uncertainty and information in transport decisions. This paper aims to measure the impact of uncertainty and information on multi-attribute decisions using Prospect Theory. In doing so, the study makes two contributions to transportation literature: one methodological and the other empirical. First, we propose a fast and tractable method for measuring Prospect Theory parameters that capture attitudes towards probabilities (probability weighting function) and attitudes towards losses (loss aversion). The elicitation method does not require the elicitation of the utility function. This makes it particularly suitable in complex multi-attribute decisions where the shape of the utility function is unknown. Second, we present the results of an experiment that uses the proposed method to measure, at the individual level, probability weighting in decisions involving joint time and money consequences in two decision contexts: risk (where probabilities are given) and ambiguity (where the probability distribution is unknown). An experimental setup that exposes subjects to real gains and losses for money and time has been built for this purpose. We observe inverse S-shaped probability weighting and loss aversion for risk. Probability weighting is even more pronounced in ambiguity, where subjects do not have precise information about the probability distribution. We explain how these results and the analysis of ambiguity attitudes in general can offer a better understanding of travelers' route or transport mode choices. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 95
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospect Theory: For risk and ambiguity
    Attanasi, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 32 (03) : 538 - 540
  • [2] Eliciting Prospect Theory When Consequences Are Measured in Time Units: "Time Is Not Money"
    Abdellaoui, Mohammed
    Kemel, Emmanuel
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2014, 60 (07) : 1844 - 1859
  • [3] An experimental test of prospect theory for predicting choice under ambiguity
    Kothiyal, Amit
    Spinu, Vitalie
    Wakker, Peter P.
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2014, 48 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [4] An experimental test of prospect theory for predicting choice under ambiguity
    Amit Kothiyal
    Vitalie Spinu
    Peter P. Wakker
    Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2014, 48 : 1 - 17
  • [5] Propensity to Risk and the Prospect Theory
    Doszyn, Mariusz
    PROBLEMS, METHODS AND TOOLS IN EXPERIMENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS, 2018, : 47 - 60
  • [6] Risk aversion in cumulative prospect theory
    Schmidt, Ulrich
    Zank, Horst
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 54 (01) : 208 - 216
  • [7] Cumulative prospect theory and imprecise risk
    Philippe, F
    MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2000, 40 (03) : 237 - 263
  • [8] Prospect theory, risk preference, and the law
    Guthrie, C
    NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2003, 97 (03) : 1115 - 1163
  • [9] Diverging effects of subjective prospect values of uncertain time and money
    Gao, Kun
    Yang, Ying
    Qu, Xiaobo
    COMMUNICATIONS IN TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 2021, 1 (01):
  • [10] Estimation of the Utility Function of Money and Housing Based on the Cumulative Prospect Theory
    Brzezicka, Justyna
    Tomal, Mateusz
    REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT AND VALUATION, 2023, 31 (03) : 83 - 92