Risk stratification for surgical outcomes in older colorectal cancer patients using ISAR-HP and G8 screening tools

被引:38
|
作者
Souwer, Esteban T. D. [1 ]
Verweij, Norbert M. [2 ]
van den Bos, Frederiek [1 ]
Bastiaannet, Esther [3 ,4 ]
Slangen, Rob M. E. [5 ]
Steup, Willem H. [6 ]
Hamaker, Marije E. [2 ]
Portielje, Johanna E. A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Haga Hosp, Dept Internal Med, POB 40551, NL-2504 LN The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Diakonessen Hosp, Dept Geriatr Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Haga Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, The Hague, Netherlands
[6] Haga Hosp, Dept Surg, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
ISAR-HP; G8; Frailty; Colorectal cancer; Surgery; PREOPERATIVE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION; COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; ADVERSE POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; FUNCTIONAL DECLINE; HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS; 1ST YEAR; MORTALITY; SURGERY; FRAILTY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jgo.2017.09.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Older patients are at risk for adverse outcomes after surgical treatment of cancer. Identifying patients at risk could affect treatment decisions and prevent functional decline. Screening tools are available to select patients for Geriatric Assessment. Until now their predictive value for adverse outcomes in older colorectal cancer patients has not been investigated. Objective: To study the predictive value of the Geriatric 8 (G8) and Identification of Seniors at Risk for Hospitalized Patients (ISAR-HP) screening tools for adverse outcomes after elective colorectal surgery in patients older than 70 years. Primary outcomes were 30-day complication rates, secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay and six-month mortality. Study Design and Methods: Multicentre cohort study from two hospitals in the Netherlands. Frail was defined as a G8 and/or ISAR-HP >= 2. Odds ratio (OR) is given with 95% Cl. Results: Overall, 139 patients (52%) out of 268 patients were included; 32 patients (23%) were ISAR-HP-frail, 68 (50%) were G8-frail, 20 were frail on both screening tools. Median age was 77.7 years. ISAR-HP frail patients were at risk for 30-day complications OR 2.4 (CI 1.1-5.4, p = 0.03), readmission OR 3.4 (1.1-11.0), cardiopulmonary complications OR 5.9 (1.6-22.6), longer hospital stay (10.3 versus 8.9 day) and six-months mortality OR 4.9 (1.1-23.4). When ISAR-HP and G8 were combined OR increased for readmission, 30-day and six-months mortality. G8 alone had no predictive value. Conclusions: ISAR-HP-frail patients are at risk for adverse outcomes after colorectal surgery. ISAR-HP combined with G8 has the strongest predictive value for complications and mortality. Key Points: Patients screening frail on ISAR-HP are at increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Screening results of G8 alone was not predictive for postoperative outcomes. Predictive value increased when G8 and ISAR-HP were combined. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 114
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Preliminary evaluation of the G8 screening tool in identifying frailty among older cancer patients: An cancer center's experience
    Swartz, K.
    Chapman, A.
    Zhan, T.
    Wen, K.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2023, 71 : S68 - S68
  • [32] The G8 screening tool as an independent predictor of survival in elderly cancer patients
    Mennitto, A.
    Biello, F.
    Forti, L. G.
    Siffredi, G.
    Mahmoud, A. Mokhtar
    Invernizzi, F.
    Maggiora, P. M.
    Rua, A.
    Branni, C.
    Gioffi, E.
    Martini, V.
    Gobbato, S.
    Pisani, C.
    Ferrara, E.
    Cappelli, M.
    Catania, E.
    Ferrante, D.
    Gaidano, G.
    Krengli, M.
    Gennari, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) : S1274 - S1274
  • [33] Detection of frailty in elderly cancer patients: Improvement of the G8 screening test
    Petit-Moneger, Aurelie
    Rainfray, Muriel
    Soubeyran, Pierre
    Bellera, Carine A.
    Mathoulin-Pelissier, Simone
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 7 (02) : 99 - 107
  • [34] Comparison of two frailty screening tools in older patients with colorectal cancer
    Zhao, Han
    Lu, Xinlin
    Zheng, Senshuang
    Wei, Danmei
    Zhao, Lizhong
    Wang, Yuan
    de Bock, Geertruida H.
    Lu, Wenli
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [35] Comparison of two frailty screening tools in older patients with colorectal cancer
    Han Zhao
    Xinlin Lu
    Senshuang Zheng
    Danmei Wei
    Lizhong Zhao
    Yuan Wang
    Geertruida H. de Bock
    Wenli Lu
    BMC Geriatrics, 23
  • [36] Development and Evaluation of a Patient-Reported G8 Screening Tool for Older Adults with Cancer
    Swartz, K.
    Wen, K.
    Chapman, A.
    Zhan, T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2024, 72 : S70 - S70
  • [37] Optimizing the G8 Screening Tool for Older Patients With Cancer: Diagnostic Performance and Validation of a Six-Item Version
    Martinez-Tapia, Claudia
    Canoui-Poitrine, Florence
    Bastuji-Garin, Sylvie
    Soubeyran, Pierre
    Mathoulin-Pelissier, Simone
    Tournigand, Christophe
    Paillaud, Elena
    Laurent, Marie
    Audureau, Etienne
    ONCOLOGIST, 2016, 21 (02): : 188 - 195
  • [38] IMPLEMENTING G8 SCREENING FOR EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF OLDER PATIENTS IN NEED OF COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT
    Delengowski, Anne
    Chapman, Andrew
    Lasota, Michelle
    Swartz, Kristine
    Thomas-Nembhard, Claudia
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2022, 49 (02) : E110 - E110
  • [39] Use of the G8 Geriatric Screening Tool in Surgical Head and Neck Cancer Patients Requiring Rehabilitation: A Multisite Investigation
    Palmer, Andrew D.
    Starmer, Heather
    Sathe, Nishad
    Yao, Theresa Jingyun
    Bolognone, Rachel K.
    Edwards, Jeffrey
    Crino, Carrie
    Kizner, Jennifer
    Graville, Donna J.
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 133 (02): : 158 - 168
  • [40] THE ROLE OF G8 SCREENING TOOL IN THE ASSESSMENT OF SURGICAL OUTCOME OF ELDERLY PATIENTS (=75 YO) WITH HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER: A PILOT STUDY
    Matsushita, Kazuhito
    Sandhu, Jaspreet
    Horie, Shigeo
    Endo, Fumiyasu
    Shimbo, Masaki
    Narimoto, Kazutaka
    Hattori, Kazunori
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E198 - E198