Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Pathophysiology, Complications and Science-Based Interventions

被引:0
|
作者
Altman, Kenneth W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol HNS, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
ENDOSCOPIC EVALUATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
The etiology of oropharyngeal dysphagia can be broad, and includes aging with atrophy, debilitation, stroke, neurodegenerative and muscular diseases, tumor and postsurgical deformity, as well as effects due to medications and drying of the mucosal membranes. Pathophysiology depends on the multiple causative factors, including the cortex and neural connections to generate the swallow, as well as the oropharyngeal musculature. While chronic debilitation and age may result in nutritional deficiency and poor hydration, the other causes generally present with aspiration risk more acutely. Bacteriologically, aspiration pneumonia is usually polymicrobial with a predominance of Gram-negative enteric bacilli. However, there is emerging evidence to suggest that odontogenic sources may complicate the severity of bacterial load. The principles behind science-based interventions are primarily aspiration assessment with bedside evaluation, and ultimately modified barium swallow (videofluoroscopy) or functional endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (with or without sensory testing). Each has its advantages and logistical concerns. Intervention and rehabilitation is unique to the patient's needs, but may include reconditioning and therapy with a speech and language pathologist, and surgical options. The emerging roles of neuroplasticity and external neuromuscular stimulation are also discussed. Copyright (C) 2012 Nestec Ltd., Vevey/S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 126
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Science-Based Health Care
    Zhu, Chen
    SCIENCE, 2010, 327 (5972) : 1429 - 1429
  • [42] Dynamics of Science-based entrepreneurship
    Colombo, Massimo
    Mustar, Philippe
    Wright, Mike
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2010, 35 (01): : 1 - 15
  • [43] Science-Based Targets: On Target?
    Giesekam, Jannik
    Norman, Jonathan
    Garvey, Alice
    Betts-Davies, Sam
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 20
  • [44] Science-based stockpile stewardship
    Jeanloz, R
    PHYSICS TODAY, 2000, 53 (12) : 44 - 50
  • [45] Defining 'science-based targets'
    Inger Andersen
    Naoko Ishii
    Thomas Brooks
    Cynthia Cummis
    Gustavo Fonseca
    Astrid Hillers
    Nicholas Macfarlane
    Nebojsa Nakicenovic
    Kevin Moss
    Johan Rockstr?m
    rew Steer
    Dominic Waughray
    Caroline Zimm
    National Science Review, 2021, 8 (07) : 17 - 20
  • [46] Salmon editorial not science-based
    Williams, JG
    FISHERIES, 1996, 21 (04) : 47 - 47
  • [47] Can there be science-based precaution?
    Weiss, Charles
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2006, 1 (01)
  • [48] Diffusion of science-based inventions
    Hohberger, Jan
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 104 : 66 - 77
  • [49] Policies: Science-based or science-informed?
    Friedman, ST
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2002, 100 (04) : 1 - 1
  • [50] Defining 'science-based targets'
    Andersen, Inger
    Ishii, Naoko
    Brooks, Thomas
    Cummis, Cynthia
    Fonseca, Gustavo
    Hillers, Astrid
    Macfarlane, Nicholas
    Nakicenovic, Nebojsa
    Moss, Kevin
    Rockstroem, Johan
    Steer, Andrew
    Waughray, Dominic
    Zimm, Caroline
    NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2021, 8 (07)