Nebulized 0.5, 2.5 and 5 ml L-epinephrine for post-extubation stridor in children: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial

被引:18
|
作者
Lucas da Silva, Paulo Sergio [1 ]
Machado Fonseca, Marcelo Cunio [2 ]
Oliveira Iglesias, Simone Brasil [2 ]
Lopes Junior, Emilio [2 ]
de Aguiar, Vania Euzebio [1 ]
de Carvalho, Werther Brunow [3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Servidor Publ Municipal, Pediat Intens Care Unit, Dept Pediat, BR-01532900 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Pediat Intens Care Unit, Dept Pediat, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Croup; Epinephrine; Extubation; Intensive care; Intubation; Stridor; RACEMIC EPINEPHRINE; AIRWAY-OBSTRUCTION; LARYNGEAL EDEMA; DEXAMETHASONE; CROUP; BUDESONIDE; ADRENALINE;
D O I
10.1007/s00134-011-2408-9
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Nebulized l-epinephrine has been recommended for the treatment of viral croup. However, the few studies assessing its effect on post-extubation stridor (PES) have shown conflicting results. We compared the efficacy and safety of nebulized l-epinephrine at three different doses for the treatment of PES. We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial including all consecutive children with a PES score of a parts per thousand yen4 (Westley score). The primary efficacy outcome was change in PES score at 40 min. A reduction of a parts per thousand yen2 points in stridor score was defined as clinically significant. A total of 96 patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three doses of nebulized l-epinephrine upon achieving a PES score of 4 or more following extubation. Stridor score and vital signs were recorded before treatment, and at 20, 40, 60 and 180 min after nebulization. Baseline characteristics were similar among all study groups. No significant difference was detected among the treatments based on change in Westley score by intent-to-treat analysis. In addition, the difference in the number of patients who clinically improved among the treatment groups was not significant (p = 0.54). Patients receiving 5 ml nebulized epinephrine had a significant increase of systolic and diastolic blood pressure at 40 and 180 min. Nebulized l-epinephrine at doses of 0.5, 2.5 and 5 ml demonstrated a lack of dose response in effect on PES and a modestly clinically significant increase in undesired side effects (heart rate and blood pressure) at higher doses.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 293
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] Comparison of captopril (0.5%) cream with diltiazem (2%) cream for chronic anal fissure: a prospective randomized double-blind two-centre clinical trial
    Ala, S.
    Enayatifard, R.
    Alvandipour, M.
    Qobadighadikolaei, R.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 18 (05) : 510 - 516
  • [22] Spinal anaesthesia with articaine 5% vs bupivacaine 0.5% for day-case lower limb surgery:: a double-blind randomized clinical trial
    Dijkstra, T.
    Reesink, J. A.
    Verdouw, B. C.
    Van der Pol, W. S. C. J. M.
    Feberwee, T.
    Vulto, A. G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 100 (01) : 104 - 108
  • [23] The effect of post-anesthetic administration of dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil on postoperative agitation of strabismus surgery in children: a randomized double-blind clinical trial
    Sahmeddini, Mohammad Ali
    Jamshidi, Mina
    Panah, Ashkan
    Salari, Mehrdad
    Banifatemi, Mahsa
    Nejad, Fatemeh Kanaani
    STRABISMUS, 2024, 32 (04) : 243 - 251
  • [24] The effect of low-dose esketamine on pain and post-partum depression after cesarean section: A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial
    Shen, Jiahong
    Song, Congzhong
    Lu, Xinlei
    Wen, Yuxin
    Song, Shaobo
    Yu, Jing
    Sun, Jianliang
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 13
  • [25] Comparison of Nebulized Ketamine to Intravenous Sub-Dissociative Dose Ketamine for Treating Acute and Chronic Painful Conditions in the Emergency Department: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Clinical Trial
    Nguyen, Tommy
    Mai, Mo
    Kun, Karina
    Gitelman, Slavic
    Gohel, Ankit
    Kabariti, Sarah
    Likourezos, Antonios
    Silver, Michael
    Hossain, Rukhsana
    Drapkin, Jefferson
    Niceforo, Patrizia
    Motov, Sergey
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2024, 139 (05): : 535 - 536
  • [26] The effect of bispectral index guided anesthesia versus standard practice on recovery after sevoflurane anesthesia in children: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial
    Abdelzaam, Elsayed
    Abd Allazeem, Ehab Saeed
    Elbarbary, Dina H.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 36 (01): : 250 - 255
  • [27] The effect of half percent oxymetazoline nasal drops on post-tonsillectomy cough, sore throat and bleeding in children; a double-blind randomized clinical trial
    Masoudifar, Mehrdad
    Rezaeian, Ahmad
    Mosharaf, Sheida
    ADVANCED BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (01): : 193
  • [28] L-Carnosine as Adjunctive Therapy in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
    Ghajar, Alireza
    Aghajan-Nashtaei, Farinaz
    Afarideh, Mohsen
    Mohammadi, Mohammad-Reza
    Akhondzadeh, Shahin
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 28 (05) : 331 - 338
  • [29] Comparison of two preserved cartilage iliac crest cortical-cancellous bone blocks graft harvesting techniques in children: A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Lai, Yongzhen
    Mao, Chuanqing
    Cai, Zhiyu
    Wang, Chengyong
    Meng, Lu
    Jing, Liu
    Chen, Wei Hui
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 51 (11) : 716 - 722
  • [30] Comparative Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of 2% Lidocaine, 4% Articaine, and 0.5% Bupivacaine on Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial
    Aggarwal, Vivek
    Singla, Mamta
    Miglani, Sanjay
    JOURNAL OF ORAL & FACIAL PAIN AND HEADACHE, 2017, 31 (02) : 124 - 128