Nebulized 0.5, 2.5 and 5 ml L-epinephrine for post-extubation stridor in children: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial

被引:18
|
作者
Lucas da Silva, Paulo Sergio [1 ]
Machado Fonseca, Marcelo Cunio [2 ]
Oliveira Iglesias, Simone Brasil [2 ]
Lopes Junior, Emilio [2 ]
de Aguiar, Vania Euzebio [1 ]
de Carvalho, Werther Brunow [3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Servidor Publ Municipal, Pediat Intens Care Unit, Dept Pediat, BR-01532900 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Pediat Intens Care Unit, Dept Pediat, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Croup; Epinephrine; Extubation; Intensive care; Intubation; Stridor; RACEMIC EPINEPHRINE; AIRWAY-OBSTRUCTION; LARYNGEAL EDEMA; DEXAMETHASONE; CROUP; BUDESONIDE; ADRENALINE;
D O I
10.1007/s00134-011-2408-9
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Nebulized l-epinephrine has been recommended for the treatment of viral croup. However, the few studies assessing its effect on post-extubation stridor (PES) have shown conflicting results. We compared the efficacy and safety of nebulized l-epinephrine at three different doses for the treatment of PES. We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial including all consecutive children with a PES score of a parts per thousand yen4 (Westley score). The primary efficacy outcome was change in PES score at 40 min. A reduction of a parts per thousand yen2 points in stridor score was defined as clinically significant. A total of 96 patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three doses of nebulized l-epinephrine upon achieving a PES score of 4 or more following extubation. Stridor score and vital signs were recorded before treatment, and at 20, 40, 60 and 180 min after nebulization. Baseline characteristics were similar among all study groups. No significant difference was detected among the treatments based on change in Westley score by intent-to-treat analysis. In addition, the difference in the number of patients who clinically improved among the treatment groups was not significant (p = 0.54). Patients receiving 5 ml nebulized epinephrine had a significant increase of systolic and diastolic blood pressure at 40 and 180 min. Nebulized l-epinephrine at doses of 0.5, 2.5 and 5 ml demonstrated a lack of dose response in effect on PES and a modestly clinically significant increase in undesired side effects (heart rate and blood pressure) at higher doses.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 293
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Nebulized 0.5, 2.5 and 5 ml l-epinephrine for post-extubation stridor in children: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial
    Paulo Sérgio Lucas da Silva
    Marcelo Cunio Machado Fonseca
    Simone Brasil Oliveira Iglesias
    Emílio Lopes Junior
    Vânia Euzébio de Aguiar
    Werther Brunow de Carvalho
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2012, 38 : 286 - 293
  • [2] Aerosolized L-epinephrine vs Budesonide for Post-extubation Stridor: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sinha, A.
    Jayashree, M.
    Singhi, S.
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2010, 47 (04) : 317 - 322
  • [3] Aerosolized L-epinephrine vs budesonide for post-extubation stridor: A randomized controlled trial
    A. Sinha
    M. Jayashree
    S. Singhi
    Indian Pediatrics, 2010, 47 : 317 - 322
  • [4] Nebulized Corticosteroid For Preventing Post-Extubation Stridor In Children: A Randomized, Double Blind Controlled Trial (preliminary Study)
    Prasertsan, P.
    Anantasit, N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 193
  • [5] Efficacy of nebulized L-epinephrine for treatment of croup: a randomized, double-blind study
    Eghbali, Aziz
    Sabbagh, Ali
    Bagheri, Bahador
    Taherahmadi, Hassan
    Kahbazi, Manijeh
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 30 (01) : 70 - 75
  • [6] The efficacy of nebulized racemic epinephrine in children with acute asthma: A randomized, double-blind trial
    Plint, AC
    Osmond, MH
    Klassen, TP
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2000, 7 (10) : 1097 - 1103
  • [7] L-Epinephrine and dexamethasone in postextubation airway obstruction: A prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study
    Cesar, Regina Grigolli
    de Carvalho, Werther Brunow
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2009, 73 (12) : 1639 - 1643
  • [8] Nebulized Fluticasone for Preventing Postextubation Stridor in Intubated Children: A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Prasertsan, Pharsai
    Nakju, Duangjai
    Lertbunrian, Rojjanee
    Chantra, Marut
    Anantasit, Nattachai
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 18 (05) : E201 - E206
  • [9] Comparison of three dosages of nebulized ketamine in the treatment of pain in the emergency department: prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial
    Courte, M.
    ANNALES FRANCAISES DE MEDECINE D URGENCE, 2021, 11 (06): : 418 - 419
  • [10] Topical sucralfate in post-adenotonsillectomy analgesia in children: A double-blind randomized clinical trial
    Miura, Mauricio Schreiner
    Saleh, Catia
    de Andrade, Marina
    Assmann, Melina
    Ayres, Marcio
    Lubianca Neto, Jose Faibes
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2009, 141 (03) : 322 - 328