Quantifying Thermally Driven Fracture Geometry During CO2 Storage

被引:7
|
作者
Taylor, Jacob [1 ]
Bryant, Steven [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Petr & Geosyst Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
CO2; Storage; Thermoelastic fractures; Geomechanics Corresponding author;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.368
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
The desired lifetime for CO2 injection for sequestration is several decades at a high injection rate ( up to 10 bbl/min or 2,400 tons/day per injector). Government regulations and geomechanical design constraints may impose a limit on the injection rate such that, for example, the bottomhole pressure remains less than 90% of the hydraulic fracture pressure. Despite injecting below the critical fracture pressure, fractures can nevertheless initiate and propagate due to a thermoelastic stress reduction caused by cool CO2 encountering hot reservoir rock. Here we develop a numerical model to calculate whether mechanical and thermal equilibrium between the injected CO2 and the reservoir evolves, such that fracture growth ceases. When such a condition exists, the model predicts the corresponding fracture geometry and time to reach that state. The critical pressure for fracture propagation depends on the thermoelastic stress, a function of rock properties and the temperature difference between the injected fluid and the reservoir (Delta T). Fractures will propagate as long as the thermoelastic stress and the fluid pressure at the fracture tip exceed a threshold; we calculate the extent of a fracture such that the tip pressure falls below the thermoelastically modified fracture propagation pressure. Fracture growth is strongly dependent upon the formation permeability, the level of injection pressure above fracture propagation pressure, and Delta T. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3390 / 3404
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Leakage Mitigation During CO2 Geological Storage Process Using CO2 Triggered Gelation
    Li, Dexiang
    Zhang, Liang
    Ren, Shaoran
    Rui, Hongxing
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2019, 58 (08) : 3395 - 3406
  • [32] Trapping of buoyancy-driven CO2 during imbibition
    Bech, Niels
    Frykman, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2018, 78 : 48 - 61
  • [33] Geomechanical challenges during geological CO2 storage: A review
    Song, Youngsoo
    Jun, Sungjun
    Na, Yoonsu
    Kim, Kyuhyun
    Jang, Youngho
    Wang, Jihoon
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 456
  • [34] Salt precipitation during CO2 storage-A review
    Miri, Rohaldin
    Hellevang, Helge
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 51 : 136 - 147
  • [35] IMMEDIATE CO2 STORAGE CAPACITY OF BODY DURING EXERCISE
    CLODE, M
    CLARK, TJH
    CAMPBELL, EJ
    CLINICAL SCIENCE, 1967, 32 (02) : 161 - &
  • [36] Advantages of supercritical CO2 compound fracturing in shale on fracture geometry, complexity and width
    Chen, Hao
    Hu, Yi
    Kang, Yong
    Wang, Xiaochuan
    Liu, Feng
    Liu, Yiwei
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 93
  • [37] STORAGE OF CO2 DURING ACUTE HYPERCAPNIA OF APNEIC OXYGENATION
    NAHAS, GG
    TRINER, L
    VEROSKY, M
    FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1965, 24 (2P1) : 336 - &
  • [38] Oil recovery and CO2 storage in CO2 flooding
    Zhao, Hailong
    Chang, Yuwen
    Feng, Songlin
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 34 (13) : 1151 - 1156
  • [39] Data-driven offshore CO2 saline storage assessment methodology
    Romeo, Lucy
    Thomas, Randal
    Mark-Moser, MacKenzie
    Bean, Andrew
    Bauer, Jennifer
    Rose, Kelly
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2022, 119
  • [40] Underground storage of CO2
    不详
    CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, 2008, 36 (08) : 635 - 635