Executive Pay-performance Sensitivity and Mandatory Upper Limits

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Ziyang [1 ]
Qi, Di [1 ]
Zhang, Mengwei [1 ]
Mang, Yingyue [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, 24 South Sect 1,Yihuan Rd, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Executive pay-performanee sensitivity; Stateowned enterprises; Government intervention; Mandatory upper limit of compensations; COMPENSATION; BEHAVIOR; FIRM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In 2009 and 2015, during the reform of state-owned enterprises, Chinese government introduced mandatory upper limits of executive compensation to resound to public outrage of excessive executive compensation. However, the limits were cancelled in 2018. Lsing Difference in Difference method, this paper empirically examines the changes of executive pay performance sensitivity after the cancellation of mandatory upper limits in 2018 for the first time. The results provide evidences that after the cancellation, executive pay performance sensitivity increases and moreover, the stronger ability the executive has, the more executive pay -performance sensitivity increases. It suggests that direct government intervention on executive compensation restricts large payoffs for exceptional performance and thus weakens incentives provided by compensation packages. In the circumstances where managers are excellent, the negative effect of mandatory upper limits on incentives is more obvious. These findings provide theoretical and empirical support for the new round of reform of compensation system of state-owned enterprises in China and helps for the policy makers to reevaluate the rationale of setting a mandatory upper limit.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 141
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Empirical Study on Effect of Managerial Discretion on CEO Pay-performance Sensitivity
    Zhang Changzheng
    Xie Jie
    2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RISK MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, ICRMEM 2008, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 616 - +
  • [32] Does nepotism run in the family? CEO pay and pay-performance sensitivity in Indian family firms
    Chen, Guoli
    Chittoor, Raveendra
    Vissa, Balagopal
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 42 (07) : 1326 - 1343
  • [33] The effect of disclosure on the pay-performance relation
    De Franco, Gus
    Hope, Ole-Kristian
    Larocque, Stephannie
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2013, 32 (05) : 319 - 341
  • [34] Effect of the Sarbanes–Oxley act on CEOs’ stock ownership and pay-performance sensitivity
    Hsihui Chang
    Hiu Lam Choy
    Kam-Ming Wan
    Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2012, 38 (2) : 177 - 207
  • [35] MERIT PAY PRACTICES - IMPLICATIONS FOR PAY-PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIPS
    SCHWAB, DP
    OLSON, CA
    INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1990, 43 (03): : S237 - S255
  • [36] A comparison of CEO pay-performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms
    Gao, Huasheng
    Li, Kai
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2015, 35 : 370 - 388
  • [37] Pay-performance sensitivity and firm size: Insights from the mutual fund industry
    Cashman, George D.
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2010, 16 (04) : 400 - 412
  • [38] Pay-performance sensitivity of compensation contracts for nonexecutive employees: the case of the financial crisis
    Kampkoetter, Patrick
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2015, 22 (09) : 734 - 738
  • [39] Can pay-performance sensitivity cure zombie firms? Evidence from China
    Wu, Yumeng
    Pan, Haiying
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2022, 43 (04) : 1080 - 1090
  • [40] Executive pensions and the pay-performance relation-Evidence from changes to pension legislation in the UK
    Morris, Damon
    Gregory-Smith, Ian
    Main, Brian G. M.
    Montagnoli, Alberto
    Wright, Peter W.
    OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 2021, 73 (03): : 1304 - 1323