PROCESS MAPPING OF ADDITIVELY-MANUFACTURED METALLIC WICKS THROUGH SURROGATE MODELING

被引:0
|
作者
Borumand, Mohammad [1 ]
Borujeni, Sima Esfandiarpour [2 ]
Nannapaneni, Saideep [2 ]
Ausherman, Moriah [1 ]
Madiraddy, Guru [3 ]
Sealy, Michael [3 ]
Hwang, Gisuk [1 ]
机构
[1] Wichita State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Wichita, KS 67260 USA
[2] Wichita State Univ, Dept Ind Syst & Mfg Engn, Wichita, KS 67260 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Dept Mech & Mat Engn, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
additive manufacturing; Bayesian optimization; laser powder bed fusion; data classification; 3D printed wick; porous materials; Gaussian; support vector machine; random forest;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Tailored wick structures are essential to develop efficient two-phase thermal management systems in various engineering applications, however, manufacturing a geometrically-complex wick is challenging using conventional manufacturing processes due to limited manufacturability and poor cost effectiveness. Additive manufacturing is an ideal alternative, however, the state-of-the-art metal three-dimensional printers have poor manufacturability when depositing pre-designed porous wicks with pore sizes below 100 mu m. In this paper, a powder bed fusion 3D printer (Matsuura Lumex Avance-25) was employed to fabricate metallic wicks through partial sintering for pore sizes below 100 mu m with data-driven control of process parameters. Hatch spacing and scan speed were selected as the two main AM process parameters to adjust. Due to the unavailability of process maps between the process parameters and properties of printed metallic wick structures, different surrogate-based models were employed to identify the combinations of the two process parameters that result in improved manufacturability of wick structures. Since the generation of training points for surrogate model training through experimentation is expensive and time-consuming, Bayesian optimization was used for sequential and intelligent selection of training points that provide maximum information gain regarding the relationships between the process parameters and the manufacturability of a 3D printed wick structure. The relationship between the required number of training points and model prediction accuracy was investigated. The AM parameters' ranges were discretized using six values of hatch spacing and seven values of scan speed, which resulted in a total of 42 combinations across the two parameters. Preliminary results conclude that 80% prediction accuracy is achievable with approximately forty training points (only 10% of total combinations). This study provides insights into the selection of optimal process parameters for the desired additively-manufactured wick structure performance.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A new strategy for strengthening additively manufactured cold spray deposits through in-process densification
    Fan, Ningsong
    Cizek, Jan
    Huang, Chunjie
    Xie, Xinliang
    Chlup, Zdenek
    Jenkins, Richard
    Lupoi, Rocco
    Yin, Shuo
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 36
  • [32] A Comparative Investigation of Properties of Metallic Parts Additively Manufactured through MEX and PBF-LB/M Technologies
    Kluczynski, Janusz
    Jasik, Katarzyna
    Luszczek, Jakub
    Sarzynski, Bartlomiej
    Grzelak, Krzysztof
    Drazan, Tomas
    Joska, Zdenek
    Szachogluchowicz, Ireneusz
    Platek, Pawel
    Malek, Marcin
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (14)
  • [33] AFRL Additive Manufacturing Modeling Series: Challenge 1, Characterization of Residual Strain Distribution in Additively-Manufactured Metal Parts Using Energy-Dispersive Diffraction
    Chuang, Andrew C.
    Park, Jun-Sang
    Shade, Paul A.
    Schwalbach, Edwin J.
    Groeber, Michael A.
    Musinski, William D.
    INTEGRATING MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING INNOVATION, 2021, 10 (04) : 525 - 541
  • [34] Unraveling the interrelation between process parameters and defects to enhance the strength of laser additively manufactured CuZrAlTi bulk metallic glass
    Luo, Haojie
    Wang, Maosong
    Liao, Wenhe
    Du, Yulei
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T, 2024, 32 : 1127 - 1140
  • [35] AFRL Additive Manufacturing Modeling Series: Challenge 1, Characterization of Residual Strain Distribution in Additively-Manufactured Metal Parts Using Energy-Dispersive Diffraction
    Andrew C. Chuang
    Jun-Sang Park
    Paul A. Shade
    Edwin J. Schwalbach
    Michael A. Groeber
    William D. Musinski
    Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation, 2021, 10 : 525 - 541
  • [36] Surface Enhancement of Additively Manufactured Bone Plate Through Hybrid-Electrochemical Magnetorheological Finishing Process
    Rajput, Atul Singh
    Kapil, Sajan
    Das, Manas
    3D PRINTING AND ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2024, 11 (03) : e1380 - e1393
  • [37] Gaussian Process-Based Model to Optimize Additively Manufactured Powder Microstructures From Phase Field Modeling
    Batabyal, Arunabha
    Sagar, Sugrim
    Zhang, Jian
    Dube, Tejesh
    Yang, Xuehui
    Zhang, Jing
    ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART B-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 8 (01):
  • [38] Locally Adapted Microstructures in an Additively Manufactured Titanium Aluminide Alloy Through Process Parameter Variation and Heat Treatment
    Moritz, Juliane
    Teschke, Mirko
    Marquardt, Axel
    Stepien, Lukas
    Lopez, Elena
    Brueckner, Frank
    Walther, Frank
    Leyens, Christoph
    ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS, 2023, 25 (02)
  • [39] Investigation of surface characteristics on post processed additively manufactured biomaterial through magnetorheological fluid assisted finishing process
    Rajput, Atul Singh
    Das, Manas
    Kapil, Sajan
    WEAR, 2023, 522
  • [40] Quantification of location-dependence in a large-scale additively manufactured build through experiments and micromechanical modeling
    Gordon, Jerard V.
    Vinci, Richard P.
    Hochhalter, Jacob D.
    Rollett, Anthony D.
    Harlow, D. Gary
    MATERIALIA, 2019, 7