Hybrid simulation for system-level structural response

被引:8
|
作者
Murray, Justin Adam [1 ]
Sasani, Mehrdad [1 ]
Shao, Xiaoyun [2 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Western Michigan Univ, Dept Civil & Construct Engn, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Hybrid simulation; Reinforced concrete; Large-scale testing; OpenSees; Structural failure; AXIAL FAILURE; FRAMEWORK; BEHAVIOR; BRIDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.018
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Hybrid simulations combine physical and analytical components into a single simulation to evaluate the response of a structure, often under seismic ground motion. This allows an experiment to be conducted in which structural components with complex response can be modeled experimentally and more well-known components can be represented within an analytical model. The coordination software UI-SimCor, developed by the MUST-SIM NEES facility at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, is a hybrid simulation tool which performs the dynamic analysis and other software and hardware coordination tasks for hybrid simulations. In many hybrid simulations, including those that have used UI-SimCor, analytical models with few effective degrees of freedom are typically used. In simulations where system-level behaviors and the response of the analytical components are of importance, a more detailed analytical system is needed. This changeover to a more complex analytical system and increase in general complexity of the hybrid simulation can cause various issues within the UI-SimCor framework. This study discusses the difficulties and issues that arise from having large and complex analytical substructures in hybrid simulation, and the effective mitigation or solutions to those problems. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 238
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mixed-technology system-level simulation
    Martinez, JA
    Kurzweg, TP
    Levitan, SP
    Marchand, PJ
    Chiarulli, DM
    ANALOG INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2001, 29 (1-2) : 127 - 149
  • [22] HARDWARE MODELS - THE WHEELS OF SYSTEM-LEVEL SIMULATION
    WIDDOES, LC
    COMPUTER DESIGN, 1989, 28 (15): : 81 - 81
  • [23] ARET for system-level IC reliability simulation
    Xuan, XD
    Chatterjee, A
    Singh, AD
    41ST ANNUAL PROCEEDINGS: INTERNATIONAL RELIABILITY PHYSICS SYMPOSIUM, 2003, : 572 - 573
  • [24] ANALOG BEHAVIORAL SIMULATION - NOT YET SYSTEM-LEVEL
    OHR, S
    COMPUTER DESIGN, 1992, 31 (06): : 139 - 140
  • [25] System-level Modeling and simulation of uplink WCDMA
    Patachaianand, Rachod
    Sandrasegaran, Kumbesan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: NEW GENERATIONS, 2008, : 1071 - 1076
  • [26] A System-Level Simulation Framework for UWB Localization
    Kuhn, Michael J.
    Mahfouz, Mohamed R.
    Zhang, Cemin
    Merkl, Brandon C.
    Fathy, Aly E.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, 2010, 58 (12) : 3527 - 3537
  • [27] HDL and integrating system-level simulation technologies
    Ussery, C
    McKinley, K
    Lang, K
    Komp, E
    Larue, W
    1997 IEEE INTERNATIONAL VERILOG HDL CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 91 - 97
  • [28] Analytical laser model for system-level simulation
    Clarici, Georg
    Griese, Elmar
    JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 25 (04) : 1070 - 1077
  • [29] Virtual Simulation Objects Concept as a Framework for System-Level Simulation
    Kovalchuk, Sergey V.
    Smirnov, Pavel A.
    Kosukhin, Sergey S.
    Boukhanovsky, Alexander V.
    2012 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-SCIENCE (E-SCIENCE), 2012,
  • [30] System-level optimisation of hybrid energy powered irrigation system
    Alam, Marzia
    Imran, Muhammad
    Sultan, Muhammad
    Manzoor, Umar
    Khan, Zafar A.
    Rezk, Ahmed
    Alaswad, Abed
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 234