Understanding relationships among recreation opportunities: A meta-analysis of nine studies

被引:43
|
作者
Pierskalla, CD
Lee, ME
Stein, TV
Anderson, DH
Nickerson, R
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] No Arizona Univ, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[5] Minnesota State Univ, Mankato, MN USA
关键词
benefits-based management; recreation opportunities; recreation management; events;
D O I
10.1080/01490400490432082
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Outdoor recreation providers intuitively know that visitors engage in particular activities in desired outdoor settings to attain beneficial experiences. There is a lack of understanding among managers and researchers, however, about the relationships that exist between these recreation opportunities. What are the salient inputs (activities and/or settings) that contribute to the production of certain outputs (benefit opportunities)? How does the magnitude of activity and setting effects compare to each other and vary across benefit items? To gain a better understanding of recreation opportunities and their relationships, data from nine benefits-based management pilot-studies were collected, analyzed, and combined using meta-analytic techniques. Two-way analysis of variance was used to test the dependency of twelve benefit attainment items on setting and activity type in each study. Meta-analysis techniques were used to calculate two types of results that were derived from the two-way analysis of variance tests. (1) Fisher's inverse chi-square method was used to combine the significance levels derived from 'F' statistics; and, (2) the 'F' statistic associated with each two-way analysis of variance test was converted into a common metric called an effect size (r) and an average effect size was calculated for each input/output relationship. Six of the twelve benefits examined were significantly affected by a recreational input, particularly activity type. These findings strengthen the argument that not all outcomes require certain types of activity and setting inputs. For a more robust comparison of the benefits, the twelve benefits were categorized based on the type of recreational input affecting them. By focusing on inputs of the production process when categorizing benefits, this research provides a more detailed breakdown of benefits. Suggestions for recreation management and future research are presented in light of these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 180
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stress Testing and Prediction of Adverse Cardiac Events in Asymptomatic Diabetics: Meta-Analysis of Nine Studies
    Panjrath, Gurusher S.
    Khan, Raffay
    Valdiviezo, Carolina
    Jadhav, Nagesh
    Jain, Diwakar
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (10) : A292 - A292
  • [22] Meta-analysis - Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies
    Egger, M
    Schneider, M
    Smith, GD
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7125): : 140 - 144
  • [23] Assessment of Osteoarthritis Candidate Genes in a Meta-Analysis of Nine Genome-Wide Association Studies
    Rodriguez-Fontenla, Cristina
    Calaza, Manuel
    Evangelou, Evangelos
    Valdes, Ana M.
    Arden, Nigel
    Blanco, Francisco J.
    Carr, Andrew
    Chapman, Kay
    Deloukas, Panos
    Doherty, Michael
    Esko, Tonu
    Garces Aleta, Carlos M.
    Gomez-Reino Carnota, Juan J.
    Helgadottir, Hafdis
    Hofman, Albert
    Jonsdottir, Ingileif
    Kerkhof, Hanneke J. M.
    Kloppenburg, Margreet
    McCaskie, Andrew
    Ntzani, Evangelia E.
    Ollier, William E. R.
    Oreiro, Natividad
    Panoutsopoulou, Kalliope
    Ralston, Stuart H.
    Ramos, Yolande F.
    Riancho, Jose A.
    Rivadeneira, Fernando
    Eline Slagboom, P.
    Styrkarsdottir, Unnur
    Thorsteinsdottir, Unnur
    Thorleifsson, Gudmar
    Tsezou, Aspasia
    Uitterlinden, Andre G.
    Wallis, Gillian A.
    Wilkinson, J. Mark
    Zhai, Guangju
    Zhu, Yanyan
    Felson, David T.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Loughlin, John
    Metspalu, Andres
    Meulenbelt, Ingrid
    Stefansson, Kari
    van Meurs, Joyce B.
    Zeggini, Eleftheria
    Spector, Timothy D.
    Gonzalez, Antonio
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 66 (04) : 940 - 949
  • [24] Understanding research synthesis (meta-analysis)
    Mosteller, F
    Colditz, GA
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1996, 17 : 1 - 23
  • [25] Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis
    Akobeng, AK
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2005, 90 (08) : 845 - 848
  • [26] Sleep duration and obesity among adults: a meta-analysis of prospective studies
    Wu, Yili
    Zhai, Long
    Zhang, Dongfeng
    SLEEP MEDICINE, 2014, 15 (12) : 1456 - 1462
  • [27] Improving hardiness among university students: A meta-analysis of intervention studies
    Gao, Jianping
    Zhu, Zhihui
    Roslan, Samsilah
    Zaremohzzabieh, Zeinab
    Burhanuddin, Nur Aimi Nasuha
    Geok, Soh Kim
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [28] Cancer risk among firefighters: A review and meta-analysis of 32 studies
    LeMasters, Grace K.
    Genaidy, Ash M.
    Succop, Paul
    Deddens, James
    Sobeih, Tarek
    Barriera-Viruet, Heriberto
    Dunning, Kari
    Lockey, James
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2006, 48 (11) : 1189 - 1202
  • [29] SLEEP DURATION AND DEPRESSION AMONG ADULTS: A META-ANALYSIS OF PROSPECTIVE STUDIES
    Zhai, Long
    Zhang, Hua
    Zhang, Dongfeng
    DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2015, 32 (09) : 664 - 670
  • [30] Meta-analysis of longitudinal studies
    Ishak, K. Jack
    Platt, Robert W.
    Joseph, Lawrence
    Hanley, James A.
    Caro, J. Jaime
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 4 (05) : 525 - 539