Impacts of Consensus Protocols and Trade Network Topologies on Blockchain System Performance

被引:4
|
作者
Wei, Xianhua [1 ]
Li, Aiya [1 ]
He, Zhou [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, 80 Zhongguancun East Rd, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Big Data Min & Knowledge Management, 80 Zhongguancun East Rd, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Blockchain; Consensus Protocol; Trade Network Topology; Agent-Based Model;
D O I
10.18564/jasss.4289
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Blockchain can be viewed as a public ledger maintained collectively by a large number of participators based on consensus protocol. We are interested in how different consensus protocols and trade network topologies affect the performance of a blockchain system, which has not been studied in the literature yet. In this paper, we proposed an agent-based model consisting of multiple trader and miner agents, and one system agent. We investigated three consensus protocols, namely proof-of-work (PoW), proof-of-stake (PoS), and delegated proof-of-stake (DPoS). We also examined three common trade network topologies: random, small-world, and scale-free. We find that both consensus protocol and trade network topology can impact the performance of blockchain system. PoS and DPoS are generally better than PoW in terms of increasing trade efficiency and equalizing wealth. Besides, scale-free trade network is not favorable because its trade efficiency is quite low, which moderates the price fluctuation and wealth inequality. Since connectivity inequality determines trade efficiency and wealth inequality, it is crucial to increase the connectivity among participants by means of not only using better consensus protocols such as PoS or DPoS, but also incentivizing apathetic or newly-joined participants to link with others. We suggest that our findings could be useful to the designers, practitioner and researchers of blockchain system and token economy.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 20
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Research Survey on Applications of Consensus Protocols in Blockchain
    Kaur, Sivleen
    Chaturvedi, Sheetal
    Sharma, Aabha
    Kar, Jayaprakash
    SECURITY AND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, 2021, 2021
  • [22] A taxonomy of blockchain consensus protocols: A survey and classification framework
    Bouraga, Sarah
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 168
  • [23] An Analysis of Hybrid Consensus in Blockchain Protocols for Correctness and Progress
    Roy, Sangita
    Shyamasundar, Rudrapatna K.
    DATA AND APPLICATIONS SECURITY AND PRIVACY XXXVII, DBSEC 2023, 2023, 13942 : 404 - 412
  • [24] Lightweight Blockchain Consensus Protocols for Vehicular Social Networks
    Zheng, Zehui
    Pan, Jianping
    Cai, Lin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 69 (06) : 5736 - 5748
  • [25] State of the Art and Challenges Facing Consensus Protocols on Blockchain
    Chalaemwongwan, Nutthakorn
    Kurutach, Werasak
    2018 32ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION NETWORKING (ICOIN), 2018, : 957 - 962
  • [26] Blockchain consensus protocols, energy consumption and cryptocurrency prices
    Sapkota, Niranjan
    Grobys, Klaus
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY MARKETS, 2020, 13 (04) : 117 - 139
  • [27] Design of nonlinear consensus protocols under directed communication topologies
    Xu Yaojin
    Tian Yu-Ping
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2012, : 5797 - 5802
  • [28] DISTRIBUTED NETWORK PROTOCOLS FOR CHANGING TOPOLOGIES - A COUNTEREXAMPLE
    SOLOWAY, SR
    HUMBLET, PA
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 1991, 39 (03) : 360 - 361
  • [29] Consensus in Wireless Blockchain System
    Xu, Qiang
    Zou, Yifei
    Yu, Dongxiao
    Xu, Minghui
    Shen, Shikun
    Li, Feng
    WIRELESS ALGORITHMS, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS, PT I, 2020, 12384 : 568 - 579
  • [30] Weighted voting on the blockchain: Improving consensus in proof of stake protocols
    Leonardos, Stefanos
    Reijsbergen, Daniel
    Piliouras, Georgios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NETWORK MANAGEMENT, 2020, 30 (05)