Impacts of Consensus Protocols and Trade Network Topologies on Blockchain System Performance

被引:4
|
作者
Wei, Xianhua [1 ]
Li, Aiya [1 ]
He, Zhou [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, 80 Zhongguancun East Rd, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Big Data Min & Knowledge Management, 80 Zhongguancun East Rd, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Blockchain; Consensus Protocol; Trade Network Topology; Agent-Based Model;
D O I
10.18564/jasss.4289
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Blockchain can be viewed as a public ledger maintained collectively by a large number of participators based on consensus protocol. We are interested in how different consensus protocols and trade network topologies affect the performance of a blockchain system, which has not been studied in the literature yet. In this paper, we proposed an agent-based model consisting of multiple trader and miner agents, and one system agent. We investigated three consensus protocols, namely proof-of-work (PoW), proof-of-stake (PoS), and delegated proof-of-stake (DPoS). We also examined three common trade network topologies: random, small-world, and scale-free. We find that both consensus protocol and trade network topology can impact the performance of blockchain system. PoS and DPoS are generally better than PoW in terms of increasing trade efficiency and equalizing wealth. Besides, scale-free trade network is not favorable because its trade efficiency is quite low, which moderates the price fluctuation and wealth inequality. Since connectivity inequality determines trade efficiency and wealth inequality, it is crucial to increase the connectivity among participants by means of not only using better consensus protocols such as PoS or DPoS, but also incentivizing apathetic or newly-joined participants to link with others. We suggest that our findings could be useful to the designers, practitioner and researchers of blockchain system and token economy.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 20
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Performance Analysis of Underlying Network Topologies for Blockchain
    Toshniwal, Bhavesh
    Kataoka, Kotaro
    35TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION NETWORKING (ICOIN 2021), 2021, : 367 - 372
  • [2] Review on Consensus Protocols for Blockchain
    Verma, Neetu
    Jain, Saurabh
    Doriya, Rajesh
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION, AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (ICCCIS), 2021, : 281 - 286
  • [3] A Survey of Blockchain Consensus Protocols
    Xu, Jie
    Wang, Cong
    Jia, Xiaohua
    ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2023, 55 (13S)
  • [4] Bottlenecks in Blockchain Consensus Protocols
    Alqahtani, Salem
    Demirbas, Murat
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OMNI-LAYER INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (IEEE COINS 2021), 2021, : 117 - 124
  • [5] MBCP: Performance Analysis of Large Scale Mainstream Blockchain Consensus Protocols
    Kaur, Manpreet
    Khan, Mohammad Zubair
    Gupta, Shikha
    Noorwali, Abdulfattah
    Chakraborty, Chinmay
    Pani, Subhendu Kumar
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 80931 - 80944
  • [6] Performance Evaluation of Consensus Protocols in Blockchain-based Audit Systems
    Ahmad, Ashar
    Saad, Muhammad
    Kim, Joongheon
    Nyang, DaeHun
    Mohaisen, David
    35TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION NETWORKING (ICOIN 2021), 2021, : 654 - 656
  • [7] Analysis of the main consensus protocols of blockchain
    Zhang, Shijie
    Lee, Jong-Hyouk
    ICT EXPRESS, 2020, 6 (02): : 93 - 97
  • [8] Blockchain Consensus: An Overview of Alternative Protocols
    Oyinloye, Damilare Peter
    Teh, Je Sen
    Jamil, Norziana
    Alawida, Moatsum
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2021, 13 (08):
  • [9] Survey of Consensus Protocols on Blockchain Applications
    Sankar, Lakshmi Siva
    Sindhu, M.
    Sethumadhavan, M.
    2017 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (ICACCS), 2017,
  • [10] Guest editorial: Blockchain consensus protocols
    Hyland-Wood, David
    Johnson, Sandra
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2022, 207