Effects of display factors on Chinese proofreading performance and preferences

被引:17
|
作者
Chan, Alan H. S. [1 ]
Ng, Annie W. Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Syst Engn & Engn Management, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
proofreading; typeface; font size; text direction; copy placement; DIFFERENT AGE-GROUPS; EYE-MOVEMENTS; VISUAL-SEARCH; BACKGROUND POLARITY; VIEWING DISTANCE; COLOR CONTRAST; WEB PAGES; FONT TYPE; TEXT; CHARACTERS;
D O I
10.1080/00140139.2012.714472
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This experiment investigated the influence of four display factors, viz. typeface (Ming Liu and Jheng Hei), font size (10-point and 14-point), text direction (horizontal and vertical) and copy placement (left-right and top-bottom) on Chinese proofreading performance and subjective preferences. Proofreading performance was measured in terms of time and accuracy, and preferences were examined in terms of comfort, ease and fatigue. It was found that the horizontal text direction resulted in faster proofreading than the vertical one, but the other three factors were non significant. The faster proofreading using the horizontal text direction was valid for both the left-right and the top-bottom arrangements. There was an interaction between typeface and font size such that, for the smaller character size (10-point), the Ming Liu style produced a faster performance than the Jheng Hei style. However, for the larger character size (14-point), the Jheng Hei style produced a faster performance than the Ming Liu style. Regarding proofreading accuracy, the number of non-detected missing words and related false alarm in left-right copy placement setting was significantly larger than that in top-down setting. Greater accuracy was obtained in proofreading at the cost of a speed-accuracy trade-off - the higher the accuracy in the proofreading task, the longer the proofreading time. Font size and text direction had significant effects on proofreading preferences, but typeface and copy placement did not.
引用
收藏
页码:1316 / 1330
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Chinese middle school teachers’ preferences regarding performance evaluation measures
    Shujie Liu
    Xianxuan Xu
    James H. Stronge
    Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2016, 28 : 161 - 177
  • [42] Chinese middle school teachers' preferences regarding performance evaluation measures
    Liu, Shujie
    Xu, Xianxuan
    Stronge, James H.
    EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2016, 28 (02) : 161 - 177
  • [43] Effects of high pixel density on reading comprehension, proofreading performance, mood state, and physical discomfort
    Mayr, Susanne
    Koepper, Maja
    Buchner, Axel
    DISPLAYS, 2017, 48 : 41 - 49
  • [44] EXPERIMENT ON CODING PREFERENCES FOR DISPLAY SYMBOLS
    WHEATLEY, E
    ERGONOMICS, 1977, 20 (05) : 543 - 552
  • [45] Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display
    Pisano, ED
    Cole, EB
    Major, S
    Zong, SQ
    Hemminger, BM
    Muller, KE
    Johnston, RE
    Walsh, R
    Conant, E
    Fajardo, LL
    Feig, SA
    Nishikawa, RM
    Yaffe, MJ
    Williams, MB
    Aylward, SR
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (03) : 820 - 830
  • [46] Factors affecting CRT display performance: specifying what works
    Compton, KD
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: IMAGE DISPLAY AND VISUALIZATION, 2000, 3976 : 412 - 423
  • [47] Effects of familiarity and type of encoding on proofreading of text
    Pilotti M.
    Chodorow M.
    Thornton K.C.
    Reading and Writing, 2005, 18 (4) : 325 - 341
  • [48] Factors Influencing Female Chinese Cancer Patients' Health Information Preferences and Behaviors
    Su, Zhaohui
    Xie, Bo
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2018, 27 (04) : 7 - 8
  • [49] Display dimensionality and conflict geometry effects on maneuver preferences for resolving in-flight conflicts
    Thomas, Lisa C.
    Wickens, Christopher D.
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2008, 50 (04) : 576 - 588
  • [50] Effects of Hover Symbology Display Scaling on Performance and Workload
    Erazo, Fabian
    Jennings, Sion
    Ellis, Kris
    Etele, Jason
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HELICOPTER SOCIETY, 2021, 66 (02)