Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: an implementation to photovoltaic modules

被引:122
|
作者
Traverso, Marzia [1 ]
Asdrubali, Francesco [2 ]
Francia, Annalisa [3 ]
Finkbeiner, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Off Z1, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Perugia, CIRIAF, Fac Ingn, I-06125 Perugia, Italy
[3] Solsonica Spa, I-02015 Cittaducale, Rieti, Italy
来源
关键词
Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment; LCA; LCC; S-LCA; Photovoltaic modules; Social indicators; SYSTEMS; LCA;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-012-0433-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The main goal of the paper is to carry out the first implementation of sustainability assessment of the assembly step of photovoltaic (PV) modules production by Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) and the development of the Life Cycle Sustainability Dashboard (LCSD), in order to compare LCSA results of different PV modules. The applicability and practicability of the LCSD is reported thanks to a case study. The results show that LCSA can be considered a valuable tool to support decision-making processes that involve different stakeholders with different knowledge and background. The sustainability performance of the production step of Italian and German polycrystalline silicon modules is assessed using the LCSD. The LCSD is an application oriented to the presentation of an LCSA study. LCSA comprises life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle costing and social LCA (S-LCA). The primary data collected for the German module are related to two different years, and this led to the evaluation of three different scenarios: a German 2008 module, a German 2009 module, and an Italian 2008 module. According to the LCA results based on Ecoindicator 99, the German module for example has lower values of land use [1.77 potential disappeared fractions (PDF) m(2)/year] and acidification (3.61 PDF m(2)/year) than the Italian one (land use 1.99 PDF m(2)/year, acidification 3.83 PDF m(2)/year). However, the German module has higher global warming potential [4.5E-05 disability-adjusted life years (DALY)] than the Italian one [3.00E-05 DALY]. The economic costs of the German module are lower than the Italian one, e.g. the cost of electricity per FU for the German module is 0.12 a,not sign/m(2) compared to the Italian 0.85 a,not sign/m(2). The S-LCA results show significant differences between German module 2008 and 2009 that represent respectively the best and the worst overall social performances of the three considered scenarios compared by LCSD. The aggregate LCSD results show that the German module 2008 has the best overall sustainability performance and a score of 665 points out of 1,000 (and a colour scale of light green). The Italian module 2008 has the worst overall sustainability performance with a score of 404 points, while the German module 2009 is in the middle with 524 points. The LCSA and LCSD methodologies represent an applicable framework as a tool for supporting decision-making processes which consider sustainable production and consumption. However, there are still challenges for a meaningful application, particularly the questions of the selection of social LCA indicators and how to weigh sets for the LCSD.
引用
收藏
页码:1068 / 1079
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Role of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment in the Implementation of Circular Economy Principles in Organizations
    Niero, Monia
    Rivera, Ximena C. Schmidt
    25TH CIRP LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING (LCE) CONFERENCE, 2018, 69 : 793 - 798
  • [22] Sustainable Manufacturing Assessment: Approach and the Trend Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis
    Gbededo, Mijoh
    Liyanage, Kapila
    ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY XXXI, 2017, 6 : 383 - 388
  • [23] Study on Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Buildings: A Review
    Basu, Manali
    Kaja, Nagaraju
    Rao, Prashanti
    Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 2024, 105 (03) : 749 - 766
  • [24] The Mathematics of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Sadhukhan, Jhuma
    Sen, Sohum
    Gadkari, Siddharth
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 309
  • [25] Life cycle sustainability assessment of fuels
    Zhou, Zupeng
    Jiang, Hua
    Qin, Liancheng
    FUEL, 2007, 86 (1-2) : 256 - 263
  • [26] Industry, life cycle assessment and sustainability
    Selmes, D
    Boron, S
    Murray, K
    1997 JUBILEE RESEARCH EVENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 153 - 156
  • [27] Life cycle Sustainability assessment of products
    Kloepffer, Walter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2008, 13 (02): : 89 - 94
  • [28] Towards application of life cycle sustainability analysis
    van der Giesen, C.
    Kleijnl, R.
    Kramer, G. J.
    Guinee, J.
    REVUE DE METALLURGIE-CAHIERS D INFORMATIONS TECHNIQUES, 2013, 110 (01): : 29 - 36
  • [29] Towards comprehensive assessment of mineral resource availability? Complementary roles of life cycle, life cycle sustainability and criticality assessments
    Andre, Hampus
    Ljunggren, Maria
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 167
  • [30] Life cycle thermodynamic analysis for photovoltaic modules: A comparative study
    AL-Zoubi, Omar H.
    Ahmad, M. Y. Turabi
    Abbas, Jamal K.
    Smaisim, Ghassan Fadhil
    Shahab, Sana
    Kareem, Anaheed Hussein
    Arjomandi, Morteza
    AIP ADVANCES, 2023, 13 (12)