Comparison of microbial source tracking efficacy for detection of cattle fecal contamination by quantitative PCR

被引:5
|
作者
Xue, Jia [1 ]
Feng, Yucheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Dept Crop Soil & Environm Sci, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
CowM2; CowM3; qPCR; Fecal contamination; Microbial source tracking; Water quality; REAL-TIME PCR; BACTEROIDALES GENETIC-MARKERS; POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION; POLLUTION SOURCES; FRESH-WATER; PERFORMANCE; RUMINANT; ASSAYS; DNA; PERSISTENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.091
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Identification of fecal contamination sources in surface water has become heavily dependent on quantitative PCR (qPCR) because this technique allows for the rapid enumeration of fecal indicator bacteria as well as the detection and quantification of fecal source-associated genetic markers in the environment. Identification of contamination sources in impaired waters is a prerequisite for developing best management practices to reduce future pollution. Proper management decisions rely on the quality and interpretation of qPCR data. In this study, we developed a method to determine analytical and process lower limits of detection (LLOD) and quantification (LLOQ) using two cattle-associated genetic markers targeting Bacteroidales. Analytical LLOD (A(LLOD)) for both CowM2 and CowM3 genetic markers in the qPCR assay were five gene copies per reaction. Using composite fecal DNA, the analytical LLOQ (A(LLOQ)) determined for CowM2 and CowM3 were 78 and 195 gene copies/reaction, respectively. When plasmid DNA was used, the A(LLOQ) for CowM2 and CowM3 were 46 and 20 gene copies/reaction, respectively. The process LLOD (P-LLOD) for CowM2 and CowM3 were 0.4 and 0.02 mg feces/filter (wet weight), respectively. Using the standard deviation value of 0.25 as a cut-off point for LLOQ in regression analysis, the process LLOQ (P-LLOQ) for CowM2 and CowM3 were 3.2 and 0.3 mg feces/filter, respectively. These results indicate that CowM3 exhibited superior performance characteristics compared with CowM2 for fecal samples collected from our geographical region. Moreover, the method for calculating LLOD and LLOQ developed here can be applied to other microbial source tracking studies. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1104 / 1112
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of two quantitative PCR assays using Bacteroidales and mitochondrial DNA markers for tracking dog fecal contamination in waterbodies
    Tambalo, Dinah D.
    Boa, Tyler
    Liljebjelke, Karen
    Yost, Christopher K.
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2012, 91 (03) : 459 - 467
  • [42] Quantitative multi-year elucidation of fecal sources of waterborne pathogen contamination in the South Nation River basin using Bacteroidales microbial source tracking markers
    Marti, Romain
    Gannon, Victor P. J.
    Jokinen, Cassandra
    Lanthier, Martin
    Lapen, David R.
    Neumann, Norman F.
    Ruecker, Norma J.
    Scott, Andrew
    Wilkes, Graham
    Zhang, Yun
    Topp, Edward
    WATER RESEARCH, 2013, 47 (07) : 2315 - 2324
  • [43] Improving fluorometry as a source tracking method to detect human fecal contamination
    Hartel, Peter G.
    McDonald, Jennifer L.
    Gentit, Lisa C.
    Hemmings, Sarah N. J.
    Rodgers, Karen
    Smith, Katy A.
    Belcher, Carolyn N.
    Kuntz, Robin L.
    Rrvera-Torres, Yaritza
    Otero, Ernesto
    Schroeder, Eduardo C.
    ESTUARIES AND COASTS, 2007, 30 (03) : 551 - 561
  • [44] Improving fluorometry as a source tracking method to detect human fecal contamination
    Peter G. Hartel
    Jennifer L. McDonald
    Lisa C. Gentit
    Sarah N. J. Hemmings
    Karen Rodgers
    Katy A. Smith
    Carolyn N. Belcher
    Robin L. Kuntz
    Yaritza Rivera-Torres
    Ernesto Otero
    Eduardo C. Schröder
    Estuaries and Coasts, 2007, 30 : 551 - 561
  • [45] Meta-analysis of microbial source tracking for the identification of fecal contamination in aquatic environments based on data-mining
    Liu, Zejun
    Lin, Yingying
    Ge, Yanhong
    Zhu, Ziyue
    Yuan, Jinlong
    Yin, Qidong
    Liu, Bingjun
    He, Kai
    Hu, Maochuan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 345
  • [46] Comparative microbial source tracking methods for identification of fecal contamination sources at Sunnyside Beach in the Toronto region area of concern
    Staley, Zachery R.
    Edge, Thomas A.
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2016, 14 (05) : 839 - 850
  • [47] Evaluation of two library-independent microbial source tracking methods to identify sources of fecal contamination in french estuaries
    Gourmelon, Michele
    Caprais, Marie Paule
    Segura, Raphael
    Le Mennec, Cecile
    Lozach, Solen
    Piriou, Jean Yves
    Rince, Alain
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 73 (15) : 4857 - 4866
  • [48] SPATIAL ANALYSIS TO HUMAN FECAL WATER CONTAMINATION BY MICROBIAL SOURCE TRACKING: ASSOCIATION WITH RISK OF SCHISTOSOMIASIS FOLLOWING TREATMENT IN BRAZIL
    Ponce-Terashima, Rafael
    Blanton, Ronald
    Reis, Mitermayer G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2015, 93 (04): : 580 - 580
  • [49] DETECTING SPECIES-SPECIFIC FECAL CONTAMINATION USING MICROBIAL SOURCE TRACKING MARKERS: A VALIDATION STUDY IN THE PERUVIAN AMAZON
    Schiaffino, Francesca
    Lorentz, Alexandra
    Pisanic, Nora
    Renjifo Trigoso, Dixner
    Siguas Salas, Mery
    Paredes Olortegui, Maribel
    Yori, Pablo
    Kosek, Margaret
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2018, 99 (04): : 407 - 407
  • [50] Humans and Hoofed Livestock Are the Main Sources of Fecal Contamination of Rivers Used for Crop Irrigation: A Microbial Source Tracking Approach
    Diaz-Gavidia, Constanza
    Barria, Carla
    Weller, Daniel L.
    Salgado-Caxito, Marilia
    Estrada, Erika M.
    Araya, Anibal
    Vera, Leonardo
    Smith, Woutrina
    Kim, Minji
    Moreno-Switt, Andrea I.
    Olivares-Pacheco, Jorge
    Adell, Aiko D.
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 13