Comparison of microbial source tracking efficacy for detection of cattle fecal contamination by quantitative PCR

被引:5
|
作者
Xue, Jia [1 ]
Feng, Yucheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Dept Crop Soil & Environm Sci, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
CowM2; CowM3; qPCR; Fecal contamination; Microbial source tracking; Water quality; REAL-TIME PCR; BACTEROIDALES GENETIC-MARKERS; POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION; POLLUTION SOURCES; FRESH-WATER; PERFORMANCE; RUMINANT; ASSAYS; DNA; PERSISTENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.091
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Identification of fecal contamination sources in surface water has become heavily dependent on quantitative PCR (qPCR) because this technique allows for the rapid enumeration of fecal indicator bacteria as well as the detection and quantification of fecal source-associated genetic markers in the environment. Identification of contamination sources in impaired waters is a prerequisite for developing best management practices to reduce future pollution. Proper management decisions rely on the quality and interpretation of qPCR data. In this study, we developed a method to determine analytical and process lower limits of detection (LLOD) and quantification (LLOQ) using two cattle-associated genetic markers targeting Bacteroidales. Analytical LLOD (A(LLOD)) for both CowM2 and CowM3 genetic markers in the qPCR assay were five gene copies per reaction. Using composite fecal DNA, the analytical LLOQ (A(LLOQ)) determined for CowM2 and CowM3 were 78 and 195 gene copies/reaction, respectively. When plasmid DNA was used, the A(LLOQ) for CowM2 and CowM3 were 46 and 20 gene copies/reaction, respectively. The process LLOD (P-LLOD) for CowM2 and CowM3 were 0.4 and 0.02 mg feces/filter (wet weight), respectively. Using the standard deviation value of 0.25 as a cut-off point for LLOQ in regression analysis, the process LLOQ (P-LLOQ) for CowM2 and CowM3 were 3.2 and 0.3 mg feces/filter, respectively. These results indicate that CowM3 exhibited superior performance characteristics compared with CowM2 for fecal samples collected from our geographical region. Moreover, the method for calculating LLOD and LLOQ developed here can be applied to other microbial source tracking studies. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1104 / 1112
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Microbial source tracking of fecal contamination in stormwater runoff
    Sherchan, Samendra
    Shahin, Shalina
    Alarcon, Joshua
    Brosky, Hanna
    Potter, Collin
    Dada, Ayokunle Christopher
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2022, 20 (09) : 1271 - 1283
  • [2] Viral Multiplex Quantitative PCR Assays for Tracking Sources of Fecal Contamination
    Wolf, Sandro
    Hewitt, Joanne
    Greening, Gail E.
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 76 (05) : 1388 - 1394
  • [3] Microbial source tracking of fecal contamination in the Pearl River Delta region
    Wu, Ren-Ren (wurenren@scies.org), 1600, Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences (37):
  • [4] Comparison of the Host Specificities of Two Bacteroidales Quantitative PCR Assays Used for Tracking Human Fecal Contamination
    Van De Werfhorst, Laurie C.
    Sercu, Bram
    Holden, Patricia A.
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 77 (17) : 6258 - 6260
  • [5] Microbial Source-Tracking Reveals Origins of Fecal Contamination in a Recovering Watershed
    Green, Hyatt
    Weller, Daniel
    Johnson, Stephanie
    Michalenko, Edward
    WATER, 2019, 11 (10)
  • [6] Microbial Source Tracking Using Quantitative and Digital PCR To Identify Sources of Fecal Contamination in Stormwater, River Water, and Beach Water in a Great Lakes Area of Concern
    Staley, Zachery R.
    Boyd, Rachel J.
    Shum, Phoenix
    Edge, Thomas A.
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 84 (20)
  • [7] Viral tools for detection of fecal contamination and microbial source tracking in wastewater from food industries and domestic sewage
    Elizabeth Barrios, Melina
    Blanco Fernandez, Maria Dolores
    Viviana Cammarata, Robertina
    Torres, Carolina
    Andrea Mbayed, Viviana
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2018, 262 : 79 - 88
  • [8] Microbial source tracking of fecal contamination in Laguna Lake, Philippines using the library-dependent method, rep-PCR
    dela Pena, Laurice Beatrice Raphaelle O.
    Labrador, Kevin L.
    Nacario, Mae Ashley G.
    Bolo, Nicole R.
    Rivera, Windell L.
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2021, 19 (05) : 762 - 774
  • [9] Use of Bacteroidales Microbial Source Tracking To Monitor Fecal Contamination in Fresh Produce Production
    Ravaliya, Kruti
    Gentry-Shields, Jennifer
    Garcia, Santos
    Heredia, Norma
    de Aceituno, Anna Fabiszewski
    Bartz, Faith E.
    Leon, Juan S.
    Jaykus, Lee-Ann
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 80 (02) : 612 - 617
  • [10] Microbial source tracking markers for detection of fecal contamination in environmental waters: relationships between pathogens and human health outcomes
    Harwood, Valerie J.
    Staley, Christopher
    Badgley, Brian D.
    Borges, Kim
    Korajkic, Asja
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2014, 38 (01) : 1 - 40