Comparison of two head autorotation tests

被引:0
|
作者
Hirvonen, TP
Aalto, H
Pyykkö, I
Juhola, M
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Karolinska Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Univ Tampere, Dept Comp Sci, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
关键词
vestibuloocular reflex; gain; phase; asymmetry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The head autorotation test is a novel method for studying the high-frequency vestibuloocular reflex without heavy machinery to generate whole-body rotation. Despite many studies with the test, the method is far from standardized, and no comparison has been made of different versions of the test. The objective of this study was to compare the vestibuloocular reflex of 100 healthy subjects measured simultaneously with two versions of the head autorotation test. Gain, phase, asymmetry, and the frequency bands reached were determined in the frequency bands of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Hz. The gain measured with both tests was close to unity (range 0.95-1.04) from 1 to 4 Hz and about 0.9 at 5 Hz. In the test developed by Vorteq the phase lagged (-7 to -21 degrees) in all the frequency bands, and it differed significantly from the phase lead of 2 to 5 degrees that was measured by the other test. The asymmetry measured with the Vorteq test increased continuously from 1.5% (1 Hz) to 5.7% (5 Hz). The results of the tests showed intersubject variation, which was larger in the higher frequency bands. in conclusion, the high-frequency vestibuloocular reflex of healthy subjects can be quantified with active head oscillation. Both tests produced similar gain results, but the phase results differed systematically. Thus, the results of different head autorotation tests may not be directly comparable.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 125
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of two tests of red lead.
    Dunlap, EE
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1908, 30 (04) : 611 - 613
  • [32] Head to head comparison of two commercial phantoms used for SRS QA
    Sarkar, Vikren
    Huang, Long
    Huang, Yu-Huei Jessica
    Szegedi, Martin W.
    Rassiah-Szegedi, Prema
    Zhao, Hui
    Salter, Bill J.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT, 2016, 4 (03): : 213 - 223
  • [33] A Head to Head Comparison of Two Commercial Phantoms Used for SRS QA
    Sarkar, V.
    Huang, L.
    Huang, Y.
    Szegedi, M.
    Rassiah-Szegedi, P.
    Zhao, H.
    Salter, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3339 - 3339
  • [34] HEAD TO HEAD ACCURACY COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO INTERSTITIAL GLUCOSE SENSORS
    Boscari, F.
    Galasso, S.
    Acciaroli, G.
    Facchinetti, A.
    Marescotti, M. C.
    Amato, A. M. L.
    Avogaro, A.
    Bruttomesso, D.
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 20 : A93 - A93
  • [35] ON THE USE OF MENTAL TESTS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF DISABILITY AFTER HEAD INJURY - WITH A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE RESULTS OF THESE TESTS IN PATIENTS AFTER HEAD INJURY AND PSYCHONEUROTICS
    TOOTH, G
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1947, 10 (01): : 1 - 11
  • [36] Head-to-Head Comparison of Intermediate Vision of Two Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
    Micheletti, J. Morgan
    Duncan, Nicole B.
    Hall, Brad
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 17 : 3983 - 3990
  • [37] Comparison between two manual thrombectomy devices: Head to head in procedural outcome
    Mancone, M
    De Luca, L
    De Persio, G
    Di Roma, A
    Petrolini, A
    Nguyen, BL
    Conti, G
    Sardella, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 96 (7A): : 76H - 76H
  • [38] A COMPARISON OF TWO ISOMETRIC TESTS OF TRUNK FLEXOR ENDURANCE
    Durall, Christopher J.
    Greene, Paul F.
    Kernozek, Thomas W.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2012, 26 (07) : 1939 - 1944
  • [39] Validity and repeatability of two direct comparison tests of aniseikonia
    Barra, F
    Antona, B
    Barrio, A
    González, E
    Sánchez, I
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46
  • [40] A COMPARISON OF SCORES ON TWO COLLEGE FRESHMAN INTELLIGENCE TESTS
    Hunsicker, Lilian
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1933, 26 (09): : 666 - 667