NIH EXAMINER: Conceptualization and Development of an Executive Function Battery

被引:186
|
作者
Kramer, Joel H. [1 ]
Mungas, Dan [2 ]
Possin, Katherine L. [1 ]
Rankin, Katherine P. [1 ]
Boxer, Adam L. [1 ]
Rosen, Howard J. [1 ]
Bostrom, Alan [1 ]
Sinha, Lena [1 ]
Berhel, Ashley [1 ]
Widmeyer, Mary [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Neurol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Rosalind Franklin Univ Med & Sci, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY; FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; BASAL GANGLIA; MEMORY SPAN; TASK; DISEASE; DEFICITS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1017/S1355617713001094
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Executive functioning is widely targeted when human cognition is assessed, but there is little consensus on how it should be operationalized and measured. Recognizing the difficulties associated with establishing standard operational definitions of executive functioning, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke entered into a contract with the University of California-San Francisco to develop psychometrically robust executive measurement tools that would be accepted by the neurology clinical trials and clinical research communities. This effort, entitled Executive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research (EXAMINER), resulted in a series of tasks targeting working memory, inhibition, set shifting, fluency, insight, planning, social cognition and behavior. We describe battery conceptualization and development, data collection, scale construction based on item response theory, and lay the foundation for studying the battery's utility and validity for specific assessment and research goals. (JINS, 2013, 19, 1-9) Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2013.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 19
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Social Origins of Executive Function Development
    Carlson, Stephanie M.
    SOCIAL INTERACTION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF EXECUTIVE FUNCTION, 2009, 123 : 87 - 98
  • [32] Executive function and development in the preschool stage
    Bausela Herreras, E.
    BOLETIN DE PEDIATRIA, 2010, 50 (214): : 272 - 276
  • [33] Rethinking Executive Function and its Development
    Doebel, Sabine
    PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 15 (04) : 942 - 956
  • [34] Parental Scaffolding and the Development of Executive Function
    Bibok, Maximilian B.
    Carpendale, Jeremy I. M.
    Mueller, Ulrich
    SOCIAL INTERACTION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF EXECUTIVE FUNCTION, 2009, 123 : 17 - 34
  • [35] Sensitive periods in executive function development
    Thompson, Abigail
    Steinbeis, Nikolaus
    CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2020, 36 : 98 - 105
  • [36] Development of Embedded Performance Validity Indicators in the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery
    Abeare, Christopher
    Erdodi, Laszlo
    Messa, Isabelle
    Terry, Douglas P.
    Panenka, William J.
    Iverson, Grant L.
    Silverberg, Noah D.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2021, 33 (01) : 90 - 96
  • [37] A Comparison of Scoring Algorithms for the NIH Toolbox Executive Function Tasks in a US Norming Sample
    Shono, Yusuke
    Ece, Berivan
    Ho, Emily H.
    Kaat, Aaron J.
    La Forte, Erica M.
    Ayturk, Ezgi
    Gershon, Richard
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2024, 36 (12) : 760 - 771
  • [38] Development and validation of an attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) executive function and behavior rating screening battery
    Hale, James B.
    Reddy, Linda A.
    Decker, Scott L.
    Thompson, Rebecca
    Henzel, Julie
    Teodori, Annemarie
    Forrest, Elizabeth
    Eusebio, Eleazar
    Denckla, Martha Bridge
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 31 (08) : 897 - 912
  • [39] Examiner training for the short physical performance battery
    Guralnik, J
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2003, 43 : 39 - 40
  • [40] EEG Power and Coherence During Preschoolers' Performance of an Executive Function Battery
    Swingler, Margaret M.
    Willoughby, Michael T.
    Calkins, Susan D.
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOBIOLOGY, 2011, 53 (08) : 771 - 784