The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research

被引:222
|
作者
Percie du Sert, Nathalie [1 ]
Hurst, Viki [1 ]
Ahluwalia, Amrita [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Alam, Sabina [5 ]
Avey, Marc T. [6 ]
Baker, Monya [7 ]
Browne, William J. [8 ]
Clark, Alejandra [9 ]
Cuthill, Innes C. [10 ]
Dirnagl, Ulrich [11 ,12 ]
Emerson, Michael [13 ]
Garner, Paul [14 ]
Holgate, Stephen T. [15 ]
Howells, David W. [16 ]
Karp, Natasha A. [17 ]
Lazic, Stanley E. [18 ]
Lidster, Katie [19 ]
MacCallum, Catriona J. [20 ]
Macleod, Malcolm [21 ,22 ]
Pearl, Esther J. [23 ]
Petersen, Ole H. [24 ]
Rawle, Frances [25 ]
Reynolds, Penny [26 ,27 ]
Rooney, Kieron [28 ]
Sena, Emily S. [29 ]
Silberberg, Shai D. [30 ]
Steckler, Thomas [31 ]
Wurbel, Hanno [32 ]
机构
[1] NC3Rs, Expt Design & Reporting, London, England
[2] William Harvey Res Inst, Vasc Pharmacol, London, England
[3] William Harvey Res Inst, London, England
[4] Queen Mary Univ London, Barts Cardiovasc CTU, London, England
[5] Taylor & Francis Grp, Publishing Eth & Integr, London, England
[6] ICF, Hlth Sci Practice, Durham, NC USA
[7] Nature, Opin, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] Univ Bristol, Sch Educ, Stat, Bristol, Avon, England
[9] PLOS ONE, Life Sci, Cambridge, England
[10] Univ Bristol, Behav Ecol, Sch Biol Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[11] Berlin Inst Hlth, QUEST Ctr Transforming Biomed Res, Berlin, Germany
[12] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Expt Neurol, Berlin, Germany
[13] Imperial Coll London, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, Platelet Pharmacol, London, England
[14] Univ Liverpool Liverpool Sch Trop Med, Ctr Evidence Synth Global Hlth, Dept Clin Sci, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[15] Univ Southampton, Clin & Expt Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[16] Univ Tasmania, Neurosci & Brain Plast, Tasmanian Sch Med, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[17] AstraZeneca, Data Sci & Quantitat Biol, Discovery Sci, R&D, Cambridge, England
[18] Prioris Ai Inc, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[19] NC3Rs, Anim Welf, London, England
[20] Hindawi Ltd, Open Sci, London, England
[21] Univ Edinburgh, Neurol & Translat Neurosci, Ctr Clin Brain Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[22] Univ Edinburgh, Res Improvement & Res Integr, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[23] NC3Rs, Expt Design, London, England
[24] Cardiff Univ, Acad Europaea Knowledge Hub, Cardiff, Wales
[25] MRC, Policy Eth & Governance, London, England
[26] Univ Florida, Stat Anesthesiol Res STAR Core, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL USA
[27] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Gainesville, FL USA
[28] Univ Sydney, Discipline Exercise & Sport Sci, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[29] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Clin Brain Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[30] NINDS, Res Qual, Bldg 36,Rm 4D04, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[31] Janssen Pharmaceut NV, Beerse, Belgium
[32] Univ Bern, Anim Welf, Vet Publ Hlth Inst, Vetsuisse Fac, Bern, Switzerland
来源
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON | 2020年 / 598卷 / 18期
基金
英国国家替代、减少和改良动物研究中心;
关键词
IMPROVING BIOSCIENCE RESEARCH; IN-VIVO EXPERIMENTS; POLICIES; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; DESIGN; CALL;
D O I
10.1113/JP280389
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved. Here, we introduce ARRIVE 2.0. The guidelines have been updated and information reorganised to facilitate their use in practice. We used a Delphi exercise to prioritise and divide the items of the guidelines into 2 sets, the 'ARRIVE Essential 10,' which constitutes the minimum requirement, and the 'Recommended Set,' which describes the research context. This division facilitates improved reporting of animal research by supporting a stepwise approach to implementation. This helps journal editors and reviewers verify that the most important items are being reported in manuscripts. We have also developed the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document, which serves (1) to explain the rationale behind each item in the guidelines, (2) to clarify key concepts, and (3) to provide illustrative examples. We aim, through these changes, to help ensure that researchers, reviewers, and journal editors are better equipped to improve the rigour and transparency of the scientific process and thus reproducibility.
引用
收藏
页码:3793 / 3801
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ARRIVE GUIDELINES 2.0
    Sprague, Wendy
    VETERINARY CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2020, 49 (03) : 378 - 379
  • [22] Reporting quality of animal research in journals that published the ARRIVE 1.0 or ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines: a cross-sectional analysis of 943 studies
    Lin, Yao
    Yang, Fanghui
    Shang, Binghan
    Speich, John E.
    Wan, Yu-Jui Yvonne
    Hashida, Hiroki
    Braun, Tobias
    Sadoughi, Ali
    Puehler, Thomas
    Lue, Tom F.
    Zhang, Kaiping
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2024, 14 (06)
  • [23] Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals: the ARRIVE guidelines
    McGrath, J. C.
    Drummond, G. B.
    McLachlan, E. M.
    Kilkenny, C.
    Wainwright, C. L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 160 (07) : 1573 - 1576
  • [24] Quality of reporting and adherence to the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 for preclinical degradable metal research in animal models of bone defect and fracture: a systematic review
    Ding, Fengxing
    Hu, Kaiyan
    Liu, Xia
    Liu, Chen
    Yang, Jinwei
    Shi, Xinli
    Liu, Bin
    Wu, Mei
    Wang, Zhe
    Feng, Liyuan
    Zhang, Jiazhen
    Ma, Bin
    REGENERATIVE BIOMATERIALS, 2022, 9
  • [25] ARRIVE has not ARRIVEd: Support for the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of in vivo Experiments) guidelines does not improve the reporting quality of papers in animal welfare, analgesia or anesthesia
    Leung, Vivian
    Rousseau-Blass, Frederik
    Beauchamp, Guy
    Pang, Daniel S. J.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (05):
  • [26] Reporting Items for Updated Clinical Guidelines: Checklist for the Reporting of Updated Guidelines (CheckUp)
    Vernooij, Robin W. M.
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    Brouwers, Melissa
    Martinez Garcia, Laura
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (01)
  • [27] Reporting Practices for Animal Studies on Peritoneal Dialysis Conducted in 2021-2023 after the Introduction of the ARRIVE 2.0 Guidelines
    Witowski, Janusz
    Sikorska, Dorota
    Catar, Rusan
    NEPHRON, 2024, 148 (11-12) : 785 - 795
  • [28] Statistical messages from ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines
    Kang, Hyun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2021, 34 (01): : 1 - 3
  • [29] JBJS']JS Will Require Adherence to ARRIVE Guidelines for Animal Research to Reduce Bias and Improve Quality of Reporting
    Bauer, Thomas W.
    Bechtold, Joan E.
    Swiontkowski, Marc F.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2019, 101 (21): : 1891 - 1893
  • [30] Arriving again: 10 years on, ARRIVE 2.0 offers a simplified set of reporting guidelines
    Alla Katsnelson
    Lab Animal, 2020, 49 : 267 - 267