Development of the HOOSglobal to Assess Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Preservation Procedures

被引:16
|
作者
Jacobs, Cale A. [1 ,2 ]
Peabody, Michael R. [1 ,3 ]
Duncan, Stephen T. [1 ,2 ]
Muchow, Ryan D. [1 ,3 ]
Nunley, Ryan M. [1 ,4 ]
Clohisy, John C. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Sports Med, 740 S Limestone,Room K426, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[3] Amer Board Family Med, Lexington, KY USA
[4] Washington Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, St Louis, MO USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2018年 / 46卷 / 04期
关键词
hip; outcome; periacetabular osteotomy; responsiveness; patient acceptable symptom state; ACCEPTABLE-SYMPTOM-STATE; VALIDATION; SCORE; REPLACEMENT; ARTHRITIS; VALIDITY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; RESPONSIVENESS; JOINT; HOOS;
D O I
10.1177/0363546517749585
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The creation of a single patient-reported outcome (PRO) platform validated across hip preservation, osteoarthritis (OA), and total hip arthroplasty (THA) populations may reduce barriers and streamline the routine collection of PROs in clinical practice. As such, the purpose of this study was to determine if augmenting the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) with additional HOOS questions would result in a PRO platform that could be used across a wider spectrum of hip patient populations. Hypothesis: The HOOS, JR would demonstrate a notable ceiling effect, but by augmenting the HOOS, JR with additional HOOS questions, a responsive PRO platform could be created. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Using preoperative and postoperative HOOS responses from a sample of 304 patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), additional items were identified to augment the HOOS, JR. The psychometric properties of a newly created PRO tool (HOOSglobal) were then compared with the HOOS, JR and other PRO instruments developed for patients with hip OA and/or undergoing THA. Results: By augmenting the HOOS, JR with 2 additional questions, the HOOSglobal was more responsive than all other included PRO tools and had significantly fewer maximum postoperative scores than the HOOS, JR (P < .0001), HOOS-Physical Function Short form (P < .0001), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (P = .02), University of California, Los Angeles activity scale (P = .0002), and modified Harris Hip Score (P = .04). The postoperative HOOSglobal score threshold associated with patients achieving the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) was 62.5. Conclusion: The HOOSglobal is a valid and responsive PRO tool after PAO and may potentially provide the orthopaedic community with a PRO platform to be used across hip-related subspecialties. For patients undergoing PAO, a postoperative HOOSglobal score >= 62.5 was associated with patients achieving the PASS.
引用
收藏
页码:940 / 946
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient-reported outcomes in drug development for hematology
    Acquadro, Catherine
    Regnault, Antoine
    HEMATOLOGY-AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY EDUCATION PROGRAM, 2015, : 496 - 500
  • [32] Correlation of Two Patient-Reported Outcomes to Assess Dyspepsia: Patients Listening to Their Gut Feeling
    Goldstein, Jay
    Hwang, Clara
    Datto, Cathy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 105 : S35 - S36
  • [33] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GUIDANCE
    Mordin, M.
    Lewis, S.
    Gnanasakthy, A.
    Demuro-Mercon, C.
    Copley-Merriman, K.
    Fehnel, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (03) : A17 - A18
  • [34] Patient-reported outcomes of ductoscopy procedures for pathologic nipple discharge
    Filipe, M. D.
    Simons, J. M.
    Moeliker, L.
    Waaijer, L.
    Vriens, M. R.
    van Diest, P. J.
    Witkamp, A. J.
    BREAST CANCER, 2021, 28 (02) : 471 - 477
  • [35] Patient-reported outcomes of ductoscopy procedures for pathologic nipple discharge
    M. D. Filipe
    J. M. Simons
    L. Moeliker
    L. Waaijer
    M. R. Vriens
    P. J. van Diest
    A. J. Witkamp
    Breast Cancer, 2021, 28 : 471 - 477
  • [36] Patient-reported outcomes in cemented and uncemented total hip replacements
    Rolfson, Ola
    Donahue, Gabrielle S.
    Hallsten, Mattias
    Garellick, Goran
    Karrholm, Johan
    Nemes, Szilard
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 26 (05) : 451 - 457
  • [37] Hip Arthroscopic Surgery With Labral Preservation and Capsular Plication in Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia: Minimum 5-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes: Response
    Ashberg, Lyall
    Charharbakhshi, Edwin O.
    Perets, Itay
    Yuen, Leslie C.
    Walsh, John P.
    Domb, Benjamin G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (04): : NP32 - NP33
  • [38] Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement
    Lingard, E. A.
    Muthumayandi, K.
    Holland, J. P.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2009, 91B (12): : 1550 - 1554
  • [39] Patient-reported experience with patient-reported outcomes in adult patients seen in rheumatology clinics
    Lapin, Brittany
    Honomichl, Ryan
    Thompson, Nicolas
    Schuster, Andrew
    Abelson, Abby
    Deal, Chad
    Rose, Susannah
    Katzan, Irene
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (SUPPL 1) : S34 - S34
  • [40] Measuring the Value of Treatment to Patients: Patient-Reported Outcomes in Drug Development
    Willke, Richard J.
    AMERICAN HEALTH AND DRUG BENEFITS, 2008, 1 (01): : 34 - 40