Predictors of Revision Surgery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

被引:34
|
作者
Pullen, W. Michael [1 ]
Bryant, Brandon [1 ]
Gaskill, Trevor [2 ,3 ]
Sicignano, Nicholas [2 ,4 ]
Evans, Amber M. [2 ,4 ]
DeMaio, Marlene [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Med Ctr Portsmouth, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 620 John Paul Jones Circle, Portsmouth, VA 23703 USA
[2] Naval Med Ctr Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA USA
[3] Orthopaed & Sports Med Ctr, Manhattan, KS USA
[4] Hlth ResearchTx, Trevose, PA USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2016年 / 44卷 / 12期
关键词
complications; arthroscopic; anterior cruciate ligament; knee surgery; revision surgery; graft failure; ARTHROSCOPIC KNEE SURGERY; TEGNER ACTIVITY LEVEL; FOLLOW-UP; RISK-FACTORS; HAMSTRING AUTOGRAFT; ACL RECONSTRUCTIONS; CONTRALATERAL ACL; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GRAFT FAILURE; DOUBLE-BLIND;
D O I
10.1177/0363546516660062
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a common orthopaedic procedure. Graft failure after reconstruction remains a devastating complication, often requiring revision surgery and less aggressive or modified rehabilitation. Worse functional and patient-reported outcomes are reported compared with primary reconstruction. Moreover, both rates and risk factors for revision are variable and inconsistent within the literature. Purpose: To determine the rate of revision surgery after ACL reconstruction in a large cohort of patients, to assess the influence of patient characteristics on the odds of revision, and to compare revision rates between active-duty military members and non-active-duty beneficiaries. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: Using administrative data from the Military Health System, a retrospective study was designed to characterize the rate of ACL revision surgery among patients treated within a military facility. All patients 18 years at the time of ACL reconstruction were identified using the American Medical Association Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) for ACL reconstruction (CPT code 29888) over 7 years (2005-2011). Revision ACL reconstructions were identified as having 2 ACL reconstruction procedure codes on the ipsilateral knee at least 90 days apart. Univariate analysis was performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for demographic, perioperative medication use, and concomitant procedure-related risk factors. A multivariate logistic regression model determined risk covariates in the active-duty cohort. Results: The study population consisted of 17,164 ACL reconstructions performed among 16,336 patients, of whom 83.3% were male with a mean SD age of 28.9 +/- 7.6 years for the nonrevision group, and was predominantly active duty (89.2%). Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction on both knees only contributed their index knee for analyses. There were 587 patients who underwent revision surgery, corresponding to an overall revision rate of 3.6%. The median time from the index surgery to revision surgery was 500 days (interquartile range, 102-2406 days). Revision rates were higher in the active-duty cohort as compared with non-active-duty beneficiaries (3.8% vs 1.8%, respectively; OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.49-3.07). Based on multivariate logistic regression in the active-duty cohort, age 35 years (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.58) and concomitant meniscal repair (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.91) were found to be protective with regard to the odds of revision surgery. Perioperative medication use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12-1.58; number needed to harm [NNH], 100) and COX-2 inhibitors (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04-1.66; NNH, 333) was associated with increased odds of revision surgery. No significant findings were detected among sex, race, nicotine use, body mass index, or other concomitant procedures of interest. Conclusion: In this large cohort study, the rate of revision ACL reconstruction was 3.6%, which is consistent with the existing literature. Increased odds of revision surgery among active-duty personnel were associated with the perioperative use of NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors. Age 35 years and concomitant meniscal repair were found to be protective against ACL revision.
引用
收藏
页码:3140 / 3145
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Failed Meniscal Repairs After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Increases Risk of Revision Surgery
    Vindfeld, Soren
    Strand, Torbjorn
    Solheim, Eirik
    Inderhaug, Eivind
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (10)
  • [32] The Effect of Posterior Tibial Slope on the Risk of Revision Surgery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Daehlin, Lene
    Inderhaug, Eivind
    Strand, Torbjorn
    Parkar, Anagha P.
    Solheim, Eirik
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (01): : 103 - 110
  • [33] Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Wright, Rick W.
    Huston, Laura J.
    Haas, Amanda K.
    Allen, Christina R.
    Anderson, Allen F.
    Cooper, Daniel E.
    DeBerardino, Thomas M.
    Dunn, Warren R.
    Lantz, Brett A.
    Mann, Barton
    Spindler, Kurt P.
    Stuart, Michael J.
    Nwosu, Samuel K.
    Albright, John P.
    Amendola, Annunziato
    Andrish, Jack T.
    Annunziata, Christopher C.
    Arciero, Robert A.
    Bach, Bernard R., Jr.
    Baker, Champ L., III
    Bartolozzi, Arthur R.
    Baumgarten, Keith M.
    Bechler, Jeffery R.
    Berg, Jeffrey H.
    Bernas, Geoffrey A.
    Brockmeier, Stephen F.
    Brophy, Robert H.
    Bush-Joseph, Charles A.
    Butler, J. Brad, V
    Campbell, John D.
    Carey, James L.
    Carpenter, James E.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Cooper, Jonathan M.
    Cox, Charles L.
    Creighton, R. Alexander
    Dahm, Diane L.
    David, Tal S.
    Flanigan, David C.
    Frederick, Robert W.
    Ganley, Theodore J.
    Garofoli, Elizabeth A.
    Gatt, Charles J., Jr.
    Gecha, Steven R.
    Giffin, James Robert
    Hame, Sharon L.
    Hannafin, Jo A.
    Harner, Christopher D.
    Harris, Norman Lindsay, Jr.
    Hechtman, Keith S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (10): : 2394 - 2401
  • [34] Revision after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction by Restoration of the Posterolateral Bundle
    Brucker, Peter U.
    Zelle, Boris A.
    Fu, Freddie H.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 15 (02) : 146 - 150
  • [35] Results of revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery
    Battaglia, Michael J.
    Cordasco, Frank A.
    Hannafin, Jo A.
    Rodeo, Scott A.
    O'Brien, Stephen J.
    Altchek, David W.
    Cavanaugh, John
    Wickiewicz, Thomas L.
    Warren, Russell F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (12): : 2057 - 2066
  • [36] Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery - Introduction
    Wetzler, MJ
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 1998, 6 (02) : 59 - 59
  • [37] Combined Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction
    Hopper, Graeme P.
    Philippe, Corentin
    El Helou, Abdo
    Gousopoulos, Lampros
    Fradin, Thomas
    Vieira, Thais Dutra
    Saithna, Adnan
    Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2022, 11 (07): : E1269 - E1275
  • [38] Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction revision surgery
    Kaz, Rodrigo
    Starman, James S.
    Fu, Freddie H.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2007, 23 (11): : 1250.e1 - 1250.e3
  • [39] Outcomes after arthroscopic revision surgery for anterior cruciate ligament injuries
    Yumashev, Alexei, V
    Baltina, Tatyana, V
    Babaskin, Dmitrii, V
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2021, 92 (04) : 443 - 447
  • [40] Predictors of knee joint loading after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Wellsandt, Elizabeth
    Khandha, Ashutosh
    Manal, Kurt
    Axe, Michael J.
    Buchanan, Thomas S.
    Snyder-Mackler, Lynn
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2017, 35 (03) : 651 - 656