Predictors of Revision Surgery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

被引:34
|
作者
Pullen, W. Michael [1 ]
Bryant, Brandon [1 ]
Gaskill, Trevor [2 ,3 ]
Sicignano, Nicholas [2 ,4 ]
Evans, Amber M. [2 ,4 ]
DeMaio, Marlene [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Med Ctr Portsmouth, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 620 John Paul Jones Circle, Portsmouth, VA 23703 USA
[2] Naval Med Ctr Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA USA
[3] Orthopaed & Sports Med Ctr, Manhattan, KS USA
[4] Hlth ResearchTx, Trevose, PA USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2016年 / 44卷 / 12期
关键词
complications; arthroscopic; anterior cruciate ligament; knee surgery; revision surgery; graft failure; ARTHROSCOPIC KNEE SURGERY; TEGNER ACTIVITY LEVEL; FOLLOW-UP; RISK-FACTORS; HAMSTRING AUTOGRAFT; ACL RECONSTRUCTIONS; CONTRALATERAL ACL; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GRAFT FAILURE; DOUBLE-BLIND;
D O I
10.1177/0363546516660062
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a common orthopaedic procedure. Graft failure after reconstruction remains a devastating complication, often requiring revision surgery and less aggressive or modified rehabilitation. Worse functional and patient-reported outcomes are reported compared with primary reconstruction. Moreover, both rates and risk factors for revision are variable and inconsistent within the literature. Purpose: To determine the rate of revision surgery after ACL reconstruction in a large cohort of patients, to assess the influence of patient characteristics on the odds of revision, and to compare revision rates between active-duty military members and non-active-duty beneficiaries. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: Using administrative data from the Military Health System, a retrospective study was designed to characterize the rate of ACL revision surgery among patients treated within a military facility. All patients 18 years at the time of ACL reconstruction were identified using the American Medical Association Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) for ACL reconstruction (CPT code 29888) over 7 years (2005-2011). Revision ACL reconstructions were identified as having 2 ACL reconstruction procedure codes on the ipsilateral knee at least 90 days apart. Univariate analysis was performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for demographic, perioperative medication use, and concomitant procedure-related risk factors. A multivariate logistic regression model determined risk covariates in the active-duty cohort. Results: The study population consisted of 17,164 ACL reconstructions performed among 16,336 patients, of whom 83.3% were male with a mean SD age of 28.9 +/- 7.6 years for the nonrevision group, and was predominantly active duty (89.2%). Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction on both knees only contributed their index knee for analyses. There were 587 patients who underwent revision surgery, corresponding to an overall revision rate of 3.6%. The median time from the index surgery to revision surgery was 500 days (interquartile range, 102-2406 days). Revision rates were higher in the active-duty cohort as compared with non-active-duty beneficiaries (3.8% vs 1.8%, respectively; OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.49-3.07). Based on multivariate logistic regression in the active-duty cohort, age 35 years (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.58) and concomitant meniscal repair (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.91) were found to be protective with regard to the odds of revision surgery. Perioperative medication use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12-1.58; number needed to harm [NNH], 100) and COX-2 inhibitors (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04-1.66; NNH, 333) was associated with increased odds of revision surgery. No significant findings were detected among sex, race, nicotine use, body mass index, or other concomitant procedures of interest. Conclusion: In this large cohort study, the rate of revision ACL reconstruction was 3.6%, which is consistent with the existing literature. Increased odds of revision surgery among active-duty personnel were associated with the perioperative use of NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors. Age 35 years and concomitant meniscal repair were found to be protective against ACL revision.
引用
收藏
页码:3140 / 3145
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictors of Revision Surgery After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Yabroudi, Mohammad A.
    Bjornsson, Haukur
    Lynch, Andrew D.
    Muller, Bart
    Samuelsson, Kristian
    Tarabichi, Majd
    Karlsson, Jon
    Fu, Freddie H.
    Harner, Christopher D.
    Irrgang, James J.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (09)
  • [2] Revision surgery after graft failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Oettl, GM
    Imhoff, AB
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1998, 123 (09): : 1033 - 1039
  • [3] Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Allen, Christina R.
    Anderson, Allen F.
    Cooper, Daniel E.
    DeBerardino, Thomas M.
    Dunn, Warren R.
    Haas, Amanda K.
    Huston, Laura J.
    Lantz, Brett A.
    Mann, Barton
    Nwosu, Sam K.
    Spindler, Kurt P.
    Stuart, Michael J.
    Wright, Rick W.
    Albright, John P.
    Amendola, Annunziato
    Andrish, Jack T.
    Annunziata, Christopher C.
    Arciero, Robert A.
    Bach, Bernard R., Jr.
    Baker, Champ L., III
    Bartolozzi, Arthur R.
    Baumgarten, Keith M.
    Bechler, Jeffery R.
    Berg, Jeffrey H.
    Bernas, Geoffrey A.
    Brockmeier, Stephen F.
    Brophy, Robert H.
    Bush-Joseph, Charles A.
    Butler, J. Brad
    Campbell, John D.
    Carey, James L.
    Carpenter, James E.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Cooper, Jonathan M.
    Cox, Charles L.
    Creighton, R. Alexander
    Dahm, Diane L.
    David, Tal S.
    Flanigan, David C.
    Frederick, Robert W.
    Ganley, Theodore J.
    Garofoli, Elizabeth A.
    Gatt, Charles J., Jr.
    Gecha, Steven R.
    Giffin, James Robert
    Hame, Sharon L.
    Hannafin, Jo A.
    Harner, Christopher D.
    Harris, Norman Lindsay, Jr.
    Hechtman, Keith S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (11): : 2586 - 2594
  • [4] Patient Outcomes and Predictors of Success After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Johnson, William R.
    Makani, Amun
    Wall, Andrew J.
    Hosseini, Ali
    Hampilos, Perry
    Li, Guoan
    Gill, Thomas J.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 3 (10)
  • [5] Results after anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery
    Labs, K
    Hasart, O
    Perka, C
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2002, 127 (10): : 861 - 867
  • [6] REVISION SURGERY FOLLOWING FAILURE OF ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
    WIRTH, CJ
    KOHN, D
    ORTHOPADE, 1993, 22 (06): : 399 - 404
  • [7] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Reconstruction
    Miller, Mark D.
    Kew, Michelle E.
    Quinn, Courtney A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2021, 29 (17) : 723 - 731
  • [8] Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Denti, Matteo
    Randelli, P.
    Bait, C.
    Volpi, P.
    EUROPEAN INSTRUCTIONAL LECTURES, VOL 14, 2014, 14 : 183 - 187
  • [9] Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Carson, EW
    Simonian, PT
    Wickiewicz, TL
    Warren, RF
    INSTRUCTIONAL COURSE LECTURES, VOL 47 - 1998, 1998, 47 : 361 - 368
  • [10] Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Inclan, P. M.
    Brophy, R. H.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2023, 105B (05): : 474 - 480