Control Efficacy and Deposition Characteristics of an Unmanned Aerial Spray System Low-Volume Application on Corn Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda

被引:13
|
作者
Shan, Changfeng [1 ]
Wu, Jiajun [2 ]
Song, Cancan [1 ]
Chen, Shengde [3 ]
Wang, Juan [4 ]
Wang, Haihong [2 ]
Wang, Guobin [1 ]
Lan, Yubin [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Technol, Coll Agr Engn & Food Sci, Zibo, Peoples R China
[2] Corteva Agrosci Technol Shanghai Co Ltd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] South China Agr Univ, Coll Elect Engn, Coll Artificial Intelligence, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Hainan Univ, Mech & Elect Engn Coll, Haikou, Peoples R China
[5] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
来源
关键词
unmanned aerial spray system; spray volume; droplet deposition; control efficacy; plant protection; LEPIDOPTERA-NOCTUIDAE; DROPLET DISTRIBUTION; HOST PLANTS; AIR-FLOW; DRIFT; VEHICLE; INSECTICIDES; MIGRATION; FUNGICIDE; SIZE;
D O I
10.3389/fpls.2022.900939
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
As a major global pest, fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda, invaded China in 2019, which has seriously threatened the safety of China's food production and raised widespread concerns. As a new low-volume application technology, an unmanned aerial spray system (UASS) is playing an important role in the control of FAW in China. However, the studies on the effect of the water application volume on the efficacy of FAW using UASS have been limited. In this study, Kromekote (R) cards were used to sample the deposition. The method of using a sampling pole and sampling leaf for the determination of deposition. Four water application volumes (7.5, 15.0, 22.5, and 30.0 L/ha) were evaluated with regard to the corn FAW control efficacy. A blank control was used as a comparison. The control efficacy was assessed at 1, 3, 7, and 14 days after treatment (DAT). The tested results showed that sampling methods have a significant effect on deposition results. The number of spray deposits and coverage on the sampling pole were 35 and 40% higher than those on the sampling leaves, respectively. The deposition and control efficacy gradually increased as the water application volume increased. The control efficacy at 14 DAT under different water application volumes was in the range of 59.4-85.4%. These data suggest that UASS spraying can be used to achieve a satisfying control of FAW, but the control efficacy of the water application volume of 30.0 and 22.5 L/ha did not differ significantly. Considering work efficiency, a water application volume of 22.5 L/ha is recommended for field operation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [31] Comparison of Spray Deposition, Control Efficacy on Wheat Aphids and Working Efficiency in the Wheat Field of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Boom Sprayer and Two Conventional Knapsack Sprayers
    Wang, Guobin
    Lan, Yubin
    Yuan, Huizhu
    Qi, Haixia
    Chen, Pengchao
    Ouyang, Fan
    Han, Yuxing
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [32] AERIAL ADULTICIDING FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF CULEX-TARSALIS IN KERN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, USING LOW-VOLUME PROPOXUR .1. SELECTION AND EVALUATION OF THE APPLICATION SYSTEM
    SCHAEFER, CH
    CLEMENT, HL
    REISEN, WK
    MULLIGAN, FS
    PARMAN, RB
    WILDER, WH
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MOSQUITO CONTROL ASSOCIATION, 1985, 1 (02) : 148 - 153
  • [33] Assessing the potential spray drift of a six-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer using a test bench and airborne drift collectors under low wind velocities: impact of atomization characteristics and application parameters
    Wongsuk, Supakorn
    Zhu, Zhaoyan
    Zheng, Aijun
    Qi, Peng
    Li, Yangfan
    Huang, Zhan
    Han, Hu
    Wang, Changling
    He, Xiongkui
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2024, 80 (12) : 6053 - 6067
  • [34] Efficacy of ultra-low volume aerial application of an azadirachtin-based insecticide for control of the pine false webworm, Acantholyda erythrocephala (L.) (Hymenoptera: Pamphiliidae), in Ontario, Canada
    Lyons, DB
    Helson, BV
    Thompson, DG
    McFarlane, JW
    Robinson, AG
    Mickle, RE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 2003, 49 (01) : 1 - 8