Control Efficacy and Deposition Characteristics of an Unmanned Aerial Spray System Low-Volume Application on Corn Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda

被引:13
|
作者
Shan, Changfeng [1 ]
Wu, Jiajun [2 ]
Song, Cancan [1 ]
Chen, Shengde [3 ]
Wang, Juan [4 ]
Wang, Haihong [2 ]
Wang, Guobin [1 ]
Lan, Yubin [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Technol, Coll Agr Engn & Food Sci, Zibo, Peoples R China
[2] Corteva Agrosci Technol Shanghai Co Ltd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] South China Agr Univ, Coll Elect Engn, Coll Artificial Intelligence, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Hainan Univ, Mech & Elect Engn Coll, Haikou, Peoples R China
[5] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
来源
关键词
unmanned aerial spray system; spray volume; droplet deposition; control efficacy; plant protection; LEPIDOPTERA-NOCTUIDAE; DROPLET DISTRIBUTION; HOST PLANTS; AIR-FLOW; DRIFT; VEHICLE; INSECTICIDES; MIGRATION; FUNGICIDE; SIZE;
D O I
10.3389/fpls.2022.900939
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
As a major global pest, fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda, invaded China in 2019, which has seriously threatened the safety of China's food production and raised widespread concerns. As a new low-volume application technology, an unmanned aerial spray system (UASS) is playing an important role in the control of FAW in China. However, the studies on the effect of the water application volume on the efficacy of FAW using UASS have been limited. In this study, Kromekote (R) cards were used to sample the deposition. The method of using a sampling pole and sampling leaf for the determination of deposition. Four water application volumes (7.5, 15.0, 22.5, and 30.0 L/ha) were evaluated with regard to the corn FAW control efficacy. A blank control was used as a comparison. The control efficacy was assessed at 1, 3, 7, and 14 days after treatment (DAT). The tested results showed that sampling methods have a significant effect on deposition results. The number of spray deposits and coverage on the sampling pole were 35 and 40% higher than those on the sampling leaves, respectively. The deposition and control efficacy gradually increased as the water application volume increased. The control efficacy at 14 DAT under different water application volumes was in the range of 59.4-85.4%. These data suggest that UASS spraying can be used to achieve a satisfying control of FAW, but the control efficacy of the water application volume of 30.0 and 22.5 L/ha did not differ significantly. Considering work efficiency, a water application volume of 22.5 L/ha is recommended for field operation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] AERIAL, GROUND AND CHEMIGATION SPRAY DEPOSITION ON CORN FOR THE CONTROL OF Spodoptera frugiperda (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE)
    Arantes Rodrigues da Cunha, Joao Paulo
    de Castro Nascimento, Ana Paula
    CIENCIA E AGROTECNOLOGIA, 2013, 37 (02): : 123 - 129
  • [2] Efficacy of Insecticidal Seed Treatment and Foliar Spray against Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda , on Maize
    Mathapati, Somashekhar C.
    Deshmukh, Sharanabasappa S.
    Dhananjaya, B. C.
    Kalleshwaraswamy, C. M.
    Sannathimmappa, H. G.
    Satish, K. M.
    Posos-Parra, Omar Alejandro
    Blanco, Carlos A.
    Mota-Sanchez, David
    SOUTHWESTERN ENTOMOLOGIST, 2024, 49 (01) : 12 - 29
  • [3] Comparative analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle and conventional spray systems for the maize fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae) management
    Shanmugam, P. S.
    Srinivasan, T.
    Baskaran, V.
    Suganthi, A.
    Vinothkumar, B.
    Arulkumar, G.
    Backiyaraj, S.
    Chinnadurai, S.
    Somasundaram, A.
    Sathiah, N.
    Muthukrishnan, N.
    Krishnamoorthy, S. V.
    Prabakar, K.
    Douresamy, S.
    Thangaraj, Y. s. johnson edward
    Pazhanivelan, S.
    Ragunath, K. P.
    Kumaraperumal, R.
    Jeyarani, S.
    Kavitha, R.
    Mohankumar, A. P.
    PLANT PROTECTION SCIENCE, 2024, 60 (02) : 181 - 192
  • [4] Impact of spray application methodology on the development of resistance to cypermethrin and spinosad by fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (JE!Smith)
    Al-Sarar, Ali
    Hall, Franklin R.
    Downer, Roger A.
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 62 (11) : 1023 - 1031
  • [5] Control efficacy and joint toxicity of metaflumizone mixed with chlorantraniliprole or indoxacarb against the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda
    Wu, Yu-Jie
    Wang, Bing-Jie
    Wang, Meng-Ru
    Peng, Ying-Chuan
    Cao, Hai-Qun
    Sheng, Cheng-Wang
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2023, 79 (03) : 1094 - 1101
  • [6] The Efficacy of Alternative, Environmentally Friendly Plant Protection Measures for Control of Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera Frugiperda, in Maize
    Babendreier, Dirk
    Agboyi, Lakpo Koku
    Beseh, Patrick
    Osae, Michael
    Nboyine, Jerry
    Ofori, Selorm E. K.
    Frimpong, Justice O.
    Clottey, Victor Attuquaye
    Kenis, Marc
    INSECTS, 2020, 11 (04)
  • [7] Optimizing insecticide application for effective fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) management in Sorghum: a field study on spray frequency and rates
    Aderajew Mihretie
    Admasie Kassaw
    Abebe Ayalew
    Abate Abtie
    Abiye Tiruneh
    Mequanint Andualem Mekonnen
    Discover Agriculture, 3 (1):
  • [9] Control efficacy of azadirachtin on the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) by soil drenching
    Acharya, Rajendra
    Sharma, Sushant Raj
    Barman, Apurba K.
    Kim, Sang-Mok
    Lee, Kyeong-Yeoll
    ARCHIVES OF INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 113 (03)
  • [10] Variation within the genus Lambertia in efficacy of low-volume aerial phosphite spray for control of Phytophthora cinnamomi
    Shearer, B. L.
    Crane, C. E.
    AUSTRALASIAN PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2012, 41 (01) : 47 - 57