Uplift resistance of buried pipelines: The contribution of seepage forces

被引:8
|
作者
Maitra, Shubhrajit [1 ,2 ]
Chatterjee, Santiram [2 ]
White, David [3 ]
Choudhury, Deepankar [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Infrastruct Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India
[3] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
关键词
Buried pipelines; Seepage; Soil-structure interaction; Uplift capacity; Finite element modelling; Offshore geotechnics; PENETRATION RATE; SHAPE FACTORS; CLAY; CAPACITY; STRENGTH; PRESSURE; BEHAVIOR; STRESS; SAND; SOIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111037
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Pipelines are commonly buried, and can buckle upwards when heated if there is insufficient soil uplift capacity. Interface tension beneath the buried pipe significantly influences the uplift capacity at shallow embedments. Conventional design approaches, which consider either zero or unlimited interface tension, do not assess and quantify the effect of interface tension on uplift capacity. The present study bridges the gap between conventional "no tension" and "full tension" capacities. Mobilisation of interface tension is governed by seepage forces which in turn directly control the formation of a gap beneath the pipe. A large deformation finite element approach, which simulates this phenomenon of gap formation using a thin layer of gap elements below the pipe, is adopted to study the soil response for various cases of uplift velocity, embedment and soil weight. The enhancement in undrained shear strength of soil at higher uplift velocities due to strain rate effects has also been considered. The interface tension mobilised at these different velocities and embedments varies systematically in a way that is expressed by modifying Hvorslev's intake factors. The proposed expressions may be used with the existing methodologies to assess pipe stability during operation, demonstrated here through a design example.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] WAVE-INDUCED FORCES ON BURIED PIPELINES
    LENNON, GP
    JOURNAL OF WATERWAY PORT COASTAL AND OCEAN ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1985, 111 (03): : 511 - 524
  • [23] WAVE-INDUCED FORCES ON BURIED PIPELINES
    MCDOUGAL, WG
    DAVIDSON, SH
    MONKMEYER, PL
    SOLLITT, CK
    JOURNAL OF WATERWAY PORT COASTAL AND OCEAN ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1988, 114 (02): : 220 - 236
  • [24] Wave induced forces around buried pipelines
    Sudhan, CM
    Sundar, V
    Rao, SN
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2002, 29 (05) : 533 - 544
  • [25] Numerical and Experimental Study of Uplift Mobilization of Buried Pipelines in Sands
    Robert, D. J.
    Thusyanthan, N. I.
    JOURNAL OF PIPELINE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND PRACTICE, 2015, 6 (01)
  • [26] Model Test of Seepage Erosion Around Defective Buried Pipelines
    Zhang, Dong-Mei
    Du, Wei-Wei
    Gao, Cheng-Peng
    PROCEEDINGS OF GEOSHANGHAI 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: MULTI-PHYSICS PROCESSES IN SOIL MECHANICS AND ADVANCES IN GEOTECHNICAL TESTING, 2018, : 261 - 270
  • [27] Penetration and uplift resistances of two interfering pipelines buried in clays
    Seehavong, Sorawit
    Keawsawasvong, Suraparb
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 10 (04)
  • [28] Uplift resistance of buried submarine pipelines: comparison between centrifuge modelling and full-scale tests
    Palmer, AC
    White, DJ
    Baumgard, AJ
    Bolton, MD
    Barefoot, AJ
    Finch, M
    Powell, T
    Faranski, AS
    Baldry, JAS
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2003, 53 (10): : 877 - 883
  • [29] Uplift resistance of buried submarine pipelines: Comparison between centrifuge modelling and full-scale tests
    Palmer, AC
    White, DJ
    Baumgard, AJ
    Bolton, MD
    Barefoot, AJ
    Finch, M
    Powell, T
    Faranski, AS
    Baldry, JAS
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2005, 55 (04): : 338 - 340
  • [30] Hydrodynamic forces on partly buried pipelines in waves/current
    Cokgor, S
    Avci, I
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL OFFSHORE AND POLAR ENGINEERING, VOL 2, 1998, : 94 - 99