Patient and Provider Experience with Telemedicine in a Urology Practice: Identifying Opportunities for Improvement

被引:4
|
作者
Cohen, Tara N. [1 ]
Choi, Eunice [2 ]
Kanji, Falisha F. [1 ]
Scott, Victoria C. S. [3 ]
Eilber, Karyn S. [4 ,5 ]
Anger, Jennifer T. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Hlth Syst, Div Urol, Female Pelv Med & Amp Reconstruct Surg, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Cedars Sinai Hlth Syst, Div Urol, Urol Residency Training Program, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Cedars Sinai Hlth Syst, Div Urol, FPMRS Fellowship Training Program, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[7] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Benign Urol Res, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[8] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Urol, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
telemedicine; personal satisfaction; urologists; pilot projects; prospective studies; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000221
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: As a result of COVID-19, several clinics have adopted telemedicine to safely deliver care. However, the introduction of a new technology into an already complex system creates new challenges that have the potential to negatively impact patient and provider experience. We aimed to use a human factors approach (the science concerned with understanding the interactions between humans and other elements in a complex system) to identify where systemic vulnerabilities may exist throughout the patient/provider experience with telemedicine. Methods: A total of 23 patients scheduled for telemedicine consults were observed during visits with providers. A trained human factors observer documented disruptions to system efficiency (eg communication breakdowns, connectivity problems and interruptions) and invited patients and providers to take a survey investigating perceptions of telemedicine technology usability, satisfaction with the experience and opportunities to improve the process. Results: Visits lasted an average of 17 minutes, 20 seconds and each visit had an average of 6 disruptions. Inefficiencies were categorized into 13 categories consisting mainly of interruptions (21, 15.22%), Internet connectivity issues (21, 15.22%), nonoptimal device setup (19, 13.77%) and repeat communication (18, 13.04%). Provider satisfaction with the system was 3.72/5.00 and perceived usability was 63.15 (68 is considered acceptable). Patient satisfaction was 4.80/5.00 and perceived usability was 85. Conclusions: These findings highlight opportunities for a multifaceted intervention, including the development of an informational sheet/video for patients, a telemedicine "best practices" guideline for physicians, a standardized training process and checklist for front office staff and an in-service training for the entire care team.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 336
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Role of Telemedicine in Urology: Contemporary Practice Patterns and Future Directions
    Badalato, Gina M.
    Kaag, Matthew
    Lee, Richard
    Vora, Anup
    Burnett, Arthur
    UROLOGY PRACTICE, 2020, 7 (02) : 122 - 126
  • [32] Follow up experience with telemedicine visits in female urology patients
    Uhr, Alex
    Leong, Joon Yau
    Syed, Ali
    Gomella, Leonard
    Glassman, Deborah
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2019, 38 : S139 - S139
  • [33] Identifying Opportunities to Improve Patient Experience With Sacral Neuromodulation: A Human Factors Approach
    Cohen, Tara N.
    Cohen, Kate A.
    Burton, Claire S.
    Kanji, Falisha F.
    Francis, Sarah E.
    Patel, Deven C.
    Ackerman, A. Lenore
    Eilber, Karyn S.
    Anger, Jennifer T.
    UROLOGY, 2021, 150 : 207 - 212
  • [34] Workplace Bullying of Urology Residents: Implications for the Patient and Provider REPLY
    Chowdhury, Mashrin L.
    Husainat, Maha M.
    Suson, Kristina D.
    UROLOGY, 2019, 127 : 35 - 35
  • [35] Utilization of telemedicine at a high-volume academic urology practice: Impact on clinical practice
    Dutta, R.
    Overholt, T.
    Xu, R.
    Smith, W.
    Matthews, C.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 1) : S132 - S132
  • [36] Patient-Provider Video Telemedicine Integrated With Clinical Care: Patient Experiences
    Reed, Mary E.
    Huang, Jie
    Parikh, Rahul
    Millman, Andrea
    Ballard, Dustin W.
    Barr, Irwin
    Wargon, Craig
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 171 (03) : 222 - +
  • [37] Telemedicine in sickle cell disease: Patient, parent, and provider perspectives
    Speller-Brown, Barbara
    Carhuas, Carlos
    Stone, Andrew
    Connolly, Megan
    Martin, Brenda
    Zhang, Anqing
    Pallapolu, Manasa
    Darbari, Deepika S.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2023, 70 (03)
  • [38] Medical Scribes, Provider and Patient Experience, and Patient Throughput: a Trial in an Academic General Internal Medicine Practice
    Heckman, James
    Mukamal, Kenneth J.
    Christensen, Adam
    Reynolds, Eileen E.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (03) : 770 - 774
  • [39] Telemedicine in the work site: a study of feasibility, and patient and provider satisfaction
    Varkey, Prathibha
    Schumacher, Kay
    Swanton, Claudia
    Timm, Barbara
    Hagen, Philip T.
    JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2008, 14 (06) : 322 - 325
  • [40] Pediatric subspecialty telemedicine use from the patient and provider perspective
    Rajdeep Pooni
    Natalie M. Pageler
    Christy Sandborg
    Tzielan Lee
    Pediatric Research, 2022, 91 : 241 - 246