A Comparison of Image-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes by PI-RADS® Score and Ethnicity in a Diverse, Multiethnic Population

被引:5
|
作者
不详
机构
[1] Department of Urology, University of Rochester, Medical Center, Rochester, NY
[2] Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
[3] Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
[4] Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
[5] Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2021年 / 206卷 / 03期
关键词
biopsy; logistic models; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate; prostatic neoplasms;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000001810
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose:NonHispanic Black (NHB) and Hispanic/Afro-Caribbean men have the highest risk of prostate cancer (PCa) compared to nonHispanic White (NHW) men. However, ethnicity-specific outcomes of targeted fusion biopsy (FB) for the detection of PCa are poorly characterized. We compared the outcomes of FB by Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS®) score and race/ethnicity among a diverse population.Materials and Methods:We evaluated all men who underwent image-guided FB for suspicious lesions on prostate magnetic resonance imaging (≥PI-RADS 3) over a 2-year period. We examined associations of race/ethnicity and PI-RADS score with risk of PCa or clinically significant PCa (cs-PCa, Gleason Group ≥2) on FB using mixed-effects logistic regression models.Results:A total of 410 men with 658 lesions were analyzed, with 201 (49.0%) identified as NHB and 125 (30.5%) identified as Hispanic. NHB men had a twofold increase in the odds of detecting cs-PCa (OR=2.7, p=0.045), while Hispanic men had similar odds of detecting cs-PCa compared to NHW men. With regard to all PCa, NHB men had a similar increase in the odds of detecting all PCa (OR=2.4, p=0.050), which was borderline statistically significant compared to NHW men on FB. When we excluded men on active surveillance, NHB men had even stronger associations with detection of cs-PCa (OR=3.10, p=0.047) or all PCa (OR=2.77, p=0.032) compared to NHW men.Conclusions:NHB men have higher odds for overall PCa and cs-PCa on FB compared to NHW men. Further work may clarify differences per PI-RADS score. Clinicians should interpret prostate magnetic resonance imaging lesions with more caution in NHB men. © 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 586
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MR-sequences for prostate cancer diagnostics: validation based on the PI-RADS scoring system and targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    Quentin, Michael
    Arsov, Christian
    Hiester, Andreas
    Buchbender, Christian
    Rabenalt, Robert
    Albers, Peter
    Antoch, Gerald
    Blondin, Dirk
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (10) : 2582 - 2589
  • [32] Erratum to: Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla
    M. C. Roethke
    T. H. Kuru
    S. Schultze
    D. Tichy
    A. Kopp-Schneider
    M. Fenchel
    H.-P. Schlemmer
    B. A. Hadaschik
    European Radiology, 2014, 24 : 967 - 967
  • [33] MR-sequences for prostate cancer diagnostics: validation based on the PI-RADS scoring system and targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy
    Lars Schimmöller
    Michael Quentin
    Christian Arsov
    Andreas Hiester
    Christian Buchbender
    Robert Rabenalt
    Peter Albers
    Gerald Antoch
    Dirk Blondin
    European Radiology, 2014, 24 : 2582 - 2589
  • [34] PI-RADS Version 2: Detection of Clinically Significant Cancer in Patients With Biopsy Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer
    Seo, Ji Won
    Shin, Su-Jin
    Oh, Young Taik
    Jung, Dae Chul
    Cho, Nam Hoon
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Park, Sung Yoon
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (01) : W1 - W9
  • [35] Role of PI-RADS Version 2 for Prediction of Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With Gleason Score 6
    Song, Wan
    Bang, Seok Hwan
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Choi, Han Yong
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2018, 16 (04) : 281 - 287
  • [36] ROLE OF PI-RADS VERSION 2 FOR PREDICTION OF UPGRADING AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE BIOPSY GLEASON SCORE 6
    Wan, Song
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Choi, Young Hyo
    Chung, Hyun Woo
    Lee, Chung Un
    Na, Jun Phil
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Choi, Han Yong
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E220 - E220
  • [37] Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naive patients
    Washino, Satoshi
    Okochi, Tomohisa
    Saito, Kimitoshi
    Konishi, Tsuzumi
    Hirai, Masaru
    Kobayashi, Yutaka
    Miyagawa, Tomoaki
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 (02) : 225 - 233
  • [38] Outcomes of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy of PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 Lesions
    Gosein, Maria
    Pang, Emily
    Chang, Silvia
    Black, Peter
    Goldenberg, Larry
    Harris, Alison
    Yasenjiang, Jason
    Yousefi, Masoud
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2018, 69 (03): : 303 - 310
  • [39] Followup of Men with PI-RADS™ 4 or 5 Abnormality on Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Nonmalignant Pathological Findings on Initial Targeted Prostate Biopsy
    Meng, Xiaosong
    Chao, Brian
    Chen, Fei
    Huang, Richard
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (03): : 748 - 754
  • [40] Non-malignancy pathologic findings and their clinical significance on targeted prostate biopsy in men with PI-RADS 4 / 5 lesions on prostate MRI
    Chen, Fei
    Meng, Xiaosong
    Chao, Brain
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Zhou, Ming
    Taneja, Samir
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 98 : 333 - 333