MRI-based radiotherapy planning

被引:0
|
作者
Largent, A. [1 ,4 ]
Nunes, J. -C. [1 ,4 ]
Lafond, C. [2 ]
Perichon, N. [2 ]
Castelli, J. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Rolland, Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Acosta, O. [1 ,4 ]
de Crevoisier, R. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes 1, Lab Traitement Signal & Image, Campus Beaulieu,263 Ave Gen Leclerc, F-35042 Rennes, France
[2] Ctr Reg Lutte Canc Eugene Marquis, Dept Radiotherapie, Ave Bataille Flandres Dunkerque, F-35042 Rennes, France
[3] Ctr Reg Lutte Canc Eugene Marquis, Dept Imagerie Med, Ave Bataille Flandres Dunkerque, F-35042 Rennes, France
[4] INSERM, UMR 1099, 263 Ave Gen Leclerc, F-35042 Rennes, France
来源
CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE | 2017年 / 21卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.canrad.2017.06.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
MRI-based radiotherapy planning is a topical subject due to the introduction of a new generation of treatment machines combining a linear accelerator and a MRI. One of the issues for introducing MRI in this task is the lack of information to provide tissue density information required for dose calculation. To cope with this issue, two strategies may be distinguished from the literature. Either a synthetic CT scan is generated from the MRI to plan the dose, or a dose is generated from the MRI based on physical underpinnings. Within the first group, three approaches appear: bulk density mapping assign a homogeneous density to different volumes of interest manually defined on a patient MRI; machine learning-based approaches model local relationship between CT and MRI image intensities from multiple data, then applying the model to a new MRI; atlas-based approaches use a co-registered training data set (CTMRI) which are registered to a new MRI to create a pseudo CT from spatial correspondences in a final fusion step. Within the second group, physics-based approaches aim at computing the dose directly from the hydrogen contained within the tissues, quantified by MRI. Excepting the physics approach, all these methods generate a synthetic CT called "pseudo CT", on which radiotherapy planning will be finally realized. This literature review shows that atlas-and machine learning-based approaches appear more accurate dosimetrically. Bulk density approaches are not appropriate for bone localization. The fastest methods are machine learning and the slowest are atlas-based approaches. The less automatized are bulk density assignation methods. The physical approaches appear very promising methods. Finally, the validation of these methods is crucial for a clinical practice, in particular in the perspective of adaptive radiotherapy delivered by a linear accelerator combined with an MRI scanner. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique (SFRO).
引用
收藏
页码:814 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MRI-guided prostate radiation therapy planning: Investigation of dosimetric accuracy of MRI-based dose planning
    Lambert, Jonathan
    Greer, Peter B.
    Menk, Fred
    Patterson, Jackie
    Parker, Joel
    Dahl, Kara
    Gupta, Sanjiv
    Capp, Anne
    Wratten, Chris
    Tang, Colin
    Kumar, Mahesh
    Dowling, Jason
    Hauville, Sarah
    Hughes, Cynthia
    Fisher, Kristen
    Lau, Peter
    Denham, James W.
    Salvado, Olivier
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 98 (03) : 330 - 334
  • [42] MRI-based treatment planning for proton radiotherapy: dosimetric validation of a deep learning-based liver synthetic CT generation method
    Liu, Yingzi
    Lei, Yang
    Wang, Yinan
    Wang, Tonghe
    Ren, Lei
    Lin, Liyong
    McDonald, Mark
    Curran, Walter J.
    Liu, Tian
    Zhou, Jun
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (14):
  • [43] Implications of contrast-enhanced CT-based and MRI-based target volume delineations in radiotherapy treatment planning for brain tumors
    Datta, Niloy R.
    David, Rajasekar
    Gupta, Rakesh K.
    La, Punita
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 4 (01) : 9 - 13
  • [44] MRI-based treatment planning for liver stereotactic body radiotherapy: validation of a deep learning-based synthetic CT generation method
    Liu, Yingzi
    Lei, Yang
    Wang, Tonghe
    Kayode, Oluwatosin
    Tian, Sibo
    Liu, Tian
    Patel, Pretesh
    Curran, Walter J.
    Ren, Lei
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 92 (1100):
  • [45] Interobserver Comparison of CT and MRI-Based Prostate Apex Definition Clinical Relevance for Conformal Radiotherapy Treatment PlanningClinical Relevance for Conformal Radiotherapy Treatment Planning
    Stefan Wachter
    Natascha Wachter-Gerstner
    Thomas Bock
    Gregor Goldner
    György Kovacs
    Annette Fransson
    Richard Pötter
    Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2002, 178 : 263 - 268
  • [46] MRI-Based Prostate SBRT Treatment Planning Using Synthetic CT
    Scholey, J.
    Nano, T.
    Miao, X.
    Larson, P.
    Descovich, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [47] MRI-Based Verification of Plaque Positioning and Treatment Planning for Episcleral Brachytherapy
    Price, S. G.
    Garcia-Ramirez, J.
    Bertelsman, C.
    Hu, Y.
    Rivard, M. J.
    Tanderup, K.
    Rao, P.
    Grigsby, P.
    Esthappan, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S305 - S306
  • [48] A dual model HU conversion from MRI intensity values within and outside of bone segment for MRI-based radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer
    Korhonen, Juha
    Kapanen, Mika
    Keyrilainen, Jani
    Seppala, Tiina
    Tenhunen, Mikko
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (01)
  • [49] Quantitative MRI-based characterization of obturator muscles after prostate cancer radiotherapy
    Scalco, E.
    Pirovano, I.
    Rancati, T.
    Cicchetti, A.
    Palorini, F.
    Avuzzi, B.
    Messina, A.
    Valdagni, R.
    Rizzo, G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S494 - S495
  • [50] Prediction of radiation proctitis in cervical cancer radiotherapy using MRI-based radiomics
    Lin, Jie
    Liu, Linying
    Yu, Haijuan
    Xie, Ning
    Sun, Yang
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 190 : S47 - S48