Occurrence and outcomes of type 3 endoleaks in endovascular aortic repair within the Vascular Quality Initiative database

被引:5
|
作者
Blakeslee-Carter, Juliet [1 ]
Beck, Adam [1 ]
Spangler, Emily [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Vasc Surg & Endovasc Therapy, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
cohort study; device evaluation; device safety; devices; vascular devices; III ENDOLEAK; STENT GRAFT; ANEURYSM; EXPERIENCE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000054
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives Type 3 endoleaks (T3ELs) represent a lack of aneurysm protection from systemic pressure. Previous studies have found a similar to 2% incidence of T3EL after standard infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR); however, no prior studies with new-generation devices have been able to determine an association between T3EL and clinical outcomes. Here we examine T3EL within the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) to define rates of occurrence, rates and modes of reintervention, and clinical consequences of these endoleaks. Design and setting Participants receiving infrarenal EVAR in the VQI from January 2003 to September 2018 were analyzed in a retrospective cohort study. Participants Of 42246 entries in the EVAR procedural registry, 41604 had complete procedural information and were included in analysis. Of these, 36082 had long-term follow-up, and 26422 had follow-up (9-21 months per VQI reporting standards) with complete endoleak data recorded. Interventions All patients included in this study underwent an infrarenal EVAR. Results Within the VQI database, the rate of T3EL in infrarenal EVAR during index hospitalization was 0.37% (n=157/41 604), of which 85% were due to midgraft separation and 15% were due to fabric disruptions. Out of the 157 index hospitalization T3ELs, 4.5% (n=7) received procedural reintervention during that hospitalization, which accounted for 1% of all index hospitalization reinterventions. During the 21-month follow-up, the rate of incident T3EL was 0.7% (n=205/26 422), which accounted for 5% of all endoleaks seen during follow-up. Reinterventions for incident T3EL at follow-up were done in 30 patients (rate 0.1%), which accounted for 9% of endoleak reinterventions and 3.3% of all reinterventions. The presence of incident T3EL found during follow-up was associated with a significant decrease in 5-year survival (74% vs 80%, respectively; p=0.041) in Kaplan-Meier analysis. Conclusion T3ELs rates at placement and follow-up remain low; however, the majority reported in long-term follow-up are incident and these incident endoleaks are associated with decreased survival in EVAR.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Length of abdominal aortic aneurysm and incidence of endoleaks type II after endovascular repair
    Dinh Dong Nghi Phan
    Meyer, Frank
    Pech, Maciej
    Halloul, Zuhir
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2015, 127 (21-22) : 851 - 857
  • [42] Embolization Outcomes of Well-defined Versus Indistinct Type II Endoleaks After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Porras-Colon, Jesus
    Pizano, Alejandro
    Pavarino, Felipe R.
    Scott, Carla K.
    Kirkwood, Melissa
    Baig, Mirza S.
    Timaran, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (06) : E80 - E81
  • [43] Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Natural history
    Tolia, AJ
    Landis, R
    Lamparello, P
    Rosen, R
    Macari, M
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (02) : 683 - 686
  • [44] Risk factors for type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Warrier, Ranjana
    Miller, Robert
    Bond, Rick
    Robertson, Ian K.
    Hewitt, Peter
    Scott, Alan
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 78 (1-2) : 61 - 63
  • [45] Translumbar embolization of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Baum, RA
    Cope, C
    Fairman, RM
    Carpenter, JP
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (01) : 111 - 116
  • [46] Five-year reintervention after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative
    Columbo, Jesse A.
    Ramkumar, Niveditta
    Martinez-Camblor, Pablo
    Kang, Ravinder
    Suckow, Bjoern D.
    O'Malley, A. James
    Sedrakyan, Art
    Goodney, Philip P.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 71 (03) : 799 - +
  • [47] Short Term and Long Term Outcomes After Endovascular or Open Repair for Ruptured Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the Vascular Quality Initiative
    D'Oria, Mario
    Hanson, Kristine T.
    Shermerhorn, Marc
    Bower, Thomas C.
    Mendes, Bernardo C.
    Shuja, Fahad
    Oderich, Gustavo S.
    DeMartino, Randall R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 59 (05) : 703 - 716
  • [48] Open and endovascular aneurysm repair in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative
    Spangler, Emily L.
    Beck, Adam W.
    SURGERY, 2017, 162 (06) : 1195 - 1206
  • [49] Outcomes of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results From a National Quality Initiative
    Bostock, I. C.
    Zarkowsky, D. S.
    Hicks, C. W.
    Stone, D. H.
    Eslami, M. H.
    Malas, M. B.
    Goodney, P. P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 (08) : 2395 - 2400
  • [50] Reimbursement for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treatment in the Vascular Quality Initiative
    Columba, Jesse A.
    Gladders, Barbara
    Austin, Andrea M.
    Wanken, Zachary J.
    Trooboff, Spencer W.
    Stone, David H.
    Powell, Richard J.
    Goodney, Philip P.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 70 (03) : E46 - E46