A Cyber-Physical Power System Risk Assessment Model Against Cyberattacks

被引:16
|
作者
Yan, Kang [1 ]
Liu, Xuan [1 ]
Lu, Yidan [1 ]
Qin, Fanglu [2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Coll Elect & Informat Engn, Changsha 410000, Peoples R China
[2] Power Dispatch Control Ctr, Guangxi Power Grid, Nanning 530000, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL | 2023年 / 17卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Man-in-the-middle attack; N-1; contingencies; network security; propagation characteristics; software vulnerabilities (SVs); VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT; RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT; FRAMEWORK; SECURITY;
D O I
10.1109/JSYST.2022.3215591
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
With the integration of cyber devices into power systems, such as information communication technology devices and intelligent electronic devices, there are currently a large number of software vulnerabilities (SVs) in cyber devices, which are probably used to obtain the authority of cyber devices for malicious attackers and be carried out subsequently severe attacks on power systems. Thus, it is inappropriate to only consider the power risks as the risk assessment for the system with the strong coupling between cyber systems and power systems. In this article, we investigate a dynamic risk assessment model for the cyber-physical power system (CPPS) against cyberattacks, combining the network security vulnerability of the supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system in a substation and physical consequences in power systems caused by it under malicious control. By construction, a dynamic network security vulnerability assessment method for the SCADA system is well studied by considering SVs and deployed network security defense measures, which is also corrected by the propagation characteristics. Moreover, we estimate physical consequences by minimum shedding loads in N-1 contingencies caused by the SCADA system in a substation under malicious control. Finally, simulations on modified IEEE 14-bus and IEEE 118-bus systems verify the proposed model's effectiveness, highlighting the importance of network security in CPPS.
引用
收藏
页码:2018 / 2028
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cyber-physical system
    Garibaldo, Francesco
    Rebecchi, Emilio
    AI & SOCIETY, 2018, 33 (03) : 299 - 311
  • [42] Computation Model of Cyber-Physical Immunosensor System
    Martsenyuk, Vasyl
    Klos-Witkowska, Aleksandra
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 62325 - 62337
  • [43] TERME: a cyber-physical resilience toolset for risk assessment
    de Juan Fidalgo, Pablo
    Pasic, Aljosa
    Maria del Alamo, Jose
    2023 JNIC CYBERSECURITY CONFERENCE, JNIC, 2023,
  • [44] Safety and security risk assessment in cyber-physical systems
    Lyu, Xiaorong
    Ding, Yulong
    Yang, Shuang-Hua
    IET CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS: THEORY & APPLICATIONS, 2019, 4 (03) : 221 - 232
  • [45] Resilience Evaluation of Cyber-Physical Power System Considering Cyber Attacks
    Kong, Xiangxing
    Lu, Zhigang
    Guo, Xiaoqiang
    Zhang, Jiangfeng
    Li, Huifeng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2024, 73 (01) : 245 - 256
  • [46] Application of Machine Learning in Cyber Security of Cyber-Physical Power System
    Peng, Sha
    Sun, Mingyang
    Zhang, Zhenyong
    Deng, Ruilong
    Cheng, Peng
    Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2022, 46 (09): : 200 - 215
  • [47] Resiliency-Driven Cyber-Physical Risk Assessment and Investment Planning for Power Substations
    Khanna, Kush
    Govindarasu, Manimaran
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 32 (05) : 1743 - 1754
  • [48] Resilience quantification model for cyber-physical power systems
    AlMuhaini, Mohammad
    IET CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS: THEORY & APPLICATIONS, 2024,
  • [49] Cyber-Physical System Security for the Electric Power Grid
    Sridhar, Siddharth
    Hahn, Adam
    Govindarasu, Manimaran
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2012, 100 (01) : 210 - 224
  • [50] Attack and defence methods in cyber-physical power system
    Yang, Ting
    Liu, Yuzhe
    Li, Wei
    IET ENERGY SYSTEMS INTEGRATION, 2022, 4 (02) : 159 - 170