Recurrence rates after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal laterally spreading tumors

被引:1
|
作者
Michielan, Andrea [1 ]
Merola, Elettra [1 ,6 ]
Vieceli, Filippo [1 ]
Rogger, Teresa Marzia [1 ]
Crispino, Federica [1 ,2 ]
Sartori, Chiara [3 ]
Decarli, Nicola Liberta [3 ,4 ]
de Pretis, Giovanni [1 ]
de Pretis, Nicolo [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] St Chiara Hosp, Dept Surg, Gastroenterol & Digest Endoscopy Unit, Trento, Italy
[2] Univ Palermo, Sect Gastroenterol & Hepatol, PROMISE, Palermo, Italy
[3] St Chiara Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Surg Pathol Unit, Trento, Italy
[4] San Giovanni Dio Hosp, Pathol Unit, Florence, Italy
[5] Univ & Hosp Trust Verona, Pancreas Inst, Dept Med, Verona, Italy
[6] St Chiara Hosp, Gastroenterol & Digest Endoscopy Unit, Largo Medaglie Oro 9, I-38122 Trento, Italy
来源
ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2023年
关键词
Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection; laterally spreading tumors; cap; recurrence; risk factors; ADENOMA RECURRENCE; CAP; RISK; SUBTYPES; EMR;
D O I
10.20524/aog.2023.0774
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (pEMR) is routinely employed for large laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). Recurrence rates following pEMR are still unclear, especially when cap-assisted EMR (EMR-c) is performed. We assessed the recurrence rates and recurrence risk factors post-pEMR for large colorectal LSTs, including both wide-field EMR (WF-EMR) and EMR-c.Methods This was a single-center, retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent pEMR for colorectal LSTs >_20 mm at our institution between 2012 and 2020. Patients had a post resection follow-up period of at least 3 months. A risk factor analysis was carried out using the Cox regression model.Results The analysis included 155 pEMR: 51 WF-EMR and 104 EMR-c, with a median lesion size of 30 (range: 20-80) mm and a median endoscopic follow up of 15 (range: 3-76) months. Overall, disease recurrence occurred in 29.0% of cases; there was no significant difference in recurrence rates between WF-EMR and EMR-c. Recurrent lesions were safely managed by endoscopic removal, and at risk analysis lesion size was the only significant risk factor for recurrence (mm; hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.06, P=0.02).Conclusions Recurrence of large colorectal LSTs after pEMR occurs in 29% of cases. This rate is mainly dependent on lesion size, and the use of a cap during pEMR has no effect on recurrence. Prospective controlled trials are needed to validate these results.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 202
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors: a meta-analysis
    Zhao, Hong-Jing
    Yin, Jie
    Ji, Cui-Ying
    Wang, Xin
    Wang, Na
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2020, 112 (12) : 941 - 947
  • [22] Predictive factors of local recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection
    Taku Sakamoto
    Takahisa Matsuda
    Yosuke Otake
    Takeshi Nakajima
    Yutaka Saito
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2012, 47 : 635 - 640
  • [23] Laterally spreading ampullary adenomas: Endoscopic piecemeal resection outcome
    Yamamoto, Kenjiro
    Ito, Takao
    Sofuni, Atsushi
    Tsuchiya, Takayoshi
    Tsuji, Shujiro
    Kamada, Kentaro
    Tanaka, Reina
    Tonozuka, Ryosuke
    Honjo, Mitsuyoshi
    Mukai, Shuntaro
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 31 : 349 - 350
  • [24] Predictive factors of local recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection
    Sakamoto, Taku
    Matsuda, Takahisa
    Otake, Yosuke
    Nakajima, Takeshi
    Saito, Yutaka
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 47 (06) : 635 - 640
  • [25] Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection as a salvage technique for challenging colorectal laterally spreading tumors
    Andrea Michielan
    Federica Crispino
    Nicolò de Pretis
    Chiara Sartori
    Nicola Libertà Decarli
    Giovanni de Pretis
    Elettra Merola
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 7859 - 7866
  • [26] Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection as a salvage technique for challenging colorectal laterally spreading tumors
    Michielan, Andrea
    Crispino, Federica
    de Pretis, Nicolo
    Sartori, Chiara
    Decarli, Nicola Liberta
    de Pretis, Giovanni
    Merola, Elettra
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (10): : 7859 - 7866
  • [27] Extended Wide Field Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Does Not Reduce Recurrence Compared to Standard Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Colonic Laterally Spreading Lesions
    Pellise, Maria
    Burgess, Nicholas G.
    Bahin, Farzan F.
    Ahlenstiel, Golo
    Sonson, Rebecca
    Williams, Stephen J.
    Lee, Eric Y.
    Mcleod, Duncan J.
    Mahajan, Hema
    Bourke, Michael J.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB168 - AB169
  • [28] Endoscopic Mucosal Resection with Circumferential Incision for the Treatment of Large Sessile Polyps and Laterally Spreading Tumors of the Colorectum
    Hong, Young Mi
    Kim, Hyung Wook
    Park, Su Bum
    Choi, Cheol Woong
    Kang, Dae Hwan
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 48 (01) : 52 - 58
  • [29] Cold snare and ablation technique for endoscopic mucosal resection of incompletely resected large laterally spreading tumors
    Djinbachian, Roupen
    Taghiakbari, Mahsa
    El Yamani, Mohammed El Mehdi
    von Renteln, Daniel
    ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 55 : E860 - E861
  • [30] LOCAL RECURRENCE AND SURVEILLANCE AFTER ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION OF LARGE COLORECTAL TUMORS
    Hotta, Kinichi
    Saito, Yutaka
    Matsuda, Takahisa
    Shinohara, Tomoaki
    Oyama, Tsuneo
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 22 : S63 - S68