Final analysis of carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab vs carfilzomib and dexamethasone in the CANDOR study

被引:38
|
作者
Usmani, Saad Z. [1 ]
Quach, Hang [2 ]
Mateos, Maria-Victoria [3 ]
Landgren, Ola [4 ]
Leleu, Xavier [5 ]
Siegel, David [6 ]
Weisel, Katja [7 ]
Shu, Xiaomei [8 ]
Li, Chuang [9 ]
Dimopoulos, Meletios [10 ]
机构
[1] Myeloma Serv Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, 530 E74th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Univ Melbourne, St Vincents Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Hosp Salamanca, ISAI, Salamanca, Spain
[4] Univ Miami, Sylvester Comprehens Canc Ctr, Miami, FL USA
[5] Ctr Hosp Univ Poitiers, Miletrie INSERM CIC 1402, Poitiers, France
[6] Hackensack Univ, Med Ctr, John Theurer Canc Ctr, Hackensack, NJ USA
[7] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
[8] Paraxel, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[9] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA USA
[10] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Sch Med, Athens, Greece
关键词
MULTIPLE-MYELOMA; OPEN-LABEL; MULTICENTER; SURVIVAL; GUIDELINES; NEGATIVITY; ISATUXIMAB; DIAGNOSIS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010026
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
CANDOR (NCT03158688) is a phase 3, randomized, open-label trial comparing carfilzomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (KdD) vs carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) in adults with relapsed/refectory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 1 to 3 prior therapies. The CANDOR study met its primary end point of progression-free survival (PFS) in the primary analysis. Here, we report the final analysis of the study, including secondary end points and subgroup analyses thereof. The median follow-up was 50 months. Patients treated with KdD had higher minimal residual disease-negative (MRD-) achievement rates (28% vs 9%; odds ratio [OR], 4.22; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.28-7.83) and MRD- complete response rates (22% vs 8%; OR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.83-6.88) than those treated with Kd. Median PFS was 28.4 months for KdD vs 15.2 months for Kd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49-0.83). Median overall survival (OS) for KdD was 50.8 months vs 43.6 months for Kd (HR, 0.78 [0.60-1.03]; P = .042). Trends toward improved OS occurred in predefined subgroups, including patients refractory to lenalidomide (KdD, not reached vs Kd, 38.2 months; HR, 0.69 [0.43-1.11]) and refractory to proteasome inhibitor (KdD, 43.2 months vs Kd, 30.0 months; HR, 0.70 [0.45-1.09]), and there was significant improvement in patients with high-risk cytogenetics (KdD, 34.3 months vs Kd: 17.1 months; HR, 0.52 [0.29-0.94]). No new safety signals were identified. In summary, the final analysis of CANDOR confirmed the PFS benefit and showed a trend in OS benefit with KdD vs Kd. These findings reinforce KdD as a standard of care for RRMM, especially in clinically relevant patient subgroups. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03158688.
引用
收藏
页码:3739 / 3748
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Isatuximab Plus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone Versus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: IKEMA Subgroup Analysis by Prior Transplantation
    Martin, Thomas G.
    Capra, Marcelo
    Mohty, Mohamad
    Suzuki, Kenshi
    Quach, Hang
    Cavo, Michele
    Moreau, Philippe
    Dimopoulos, Meletios
    Yong, Kwee
    Tekle, Christina
    Foster, Meredith C.
    Barnes, Yvonne
    Risse, Marie-Laure
    Mikhael, Joseph
    TRANSPLANTATION AND CELLULAR THERAPY, 2023, 29 (02): : 134.e1 - 134.e7
  • [42] Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis.
    Facon, Thierry
    Moreau, Philippe
    Martin, Thomas G.
    Spicka, Ivan
    Oriol, Albert
    Koh, Youngil
    Lim, Andrew
    Mikala, Gabor
    Rosinol, Laura
    Yagci, Munci
    Cavo, Michele
    Yong, Kwee
    Risse, Marie-Laure
    Asset, Gaelle
    Schwab, Sandrine
    Martinez, Gracia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [43] Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment: IKEMA subgroup analysis
    Capra, Marcelo
    Martin, Thomas
    Moreau, Philippe
    Baker, Ross
    Pour, Ludek
    Min, Chang-Ki
    Leleu, Xavier
    Mohty, Mohamad
    Reinoso Segura, Marta
    Turgut, Mehmet
    LeBlanc, Richard
    Risse, Marie-Laure
    Malinge, Laure
    Schwab, Sandrine
    Dimopoulos, Meletios
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2022, 107 (06) : 1397 - 1409
  • [45] Efficacy of Daratumumab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone Compared to Daratumumab, Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in High Risk Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Multicenter Real-World Experience
    Magee, Gray
    Mansour, Razan
    Chang, Mark
    Atrash, Shebli
    Ahmed, Nausheen
    Mushtaq, Muhammad Umair
    Ouchveridze, Evguenia
    Abdallah, Al-Ola
    Paul, Barry
    Green, Kimberly M.
    Davis, James A.
    Hashmi, Hamza
    BLOOD, 2024, 144 : 7034 - 7035
  • [46] Efficacy and Safety of Daratumumab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone Compared to Daratumumab, Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Daratumumab-Naive Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Multicenter Real-World Experience
    Mansour, Razan
    Davis, James A.
    Minchak, Megan
    Atallah, Rawan
    Saif, Md Saiful Islam
    Logan, Emerson
    Tabak, Carine
    Rashid, Aliya
    Dima, Danai
    Ahmed, Nausheen
    Abdallah, Al-Ola
    Hashmi, Hamza
    BLOOD, 2023, 142
  • [47] Economic evaluation of six and 12 month (m) treatment with isatuximab and carfilzomib and dexamethasone (IKd) versus daratumumab and carfilzomib and dexamethasone (DKd) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
    AlRawashdh, Neda
    Choi, Briana
    Obeng-Kusi, Mavis
    Calamia, Matthias
    McBride, Ali
    Abraham, Ivo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [48] A phase II study of daratumumab with weekly carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.
    Yee, Andrew J.
    Nadeem, Omar
    Rosenblatt, Jacalyn
    Bianchi, Giada
    O'Donnell, Elizabeth
    Branagan, Andrew R.
    Harrington, Cynthia C.
    Agyemang, Emerentia A.
    Gammon, Marilyn T.
    Lively, Kathleen J.
    Packer, Lisette A.
    Bernstein, Zachary S.
    Lyons, Rebecca T.
    Riadi, Manal
    Rowell, Sean M.
    Mcvey, Cailin
    Goguen, Amy C.
    Horick, Nora K.
    Richardson, Paul G.
    Raje, Noopur S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16)
  • [49] Carfilzomib–dexamethasone vs bortezomib–dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma by cytogenetic risk in the phase 3 study ENDEAVOR
    W-J Chng
    H Goldschmidt
    M A Dimopoulos
    P Moreau
    D Joshua
    A Palumbo
    T Facon
    H Ludwig
    L Pour
    R Niesvizky
    A Oriol
    L Rosiñol
    A Suvorov
    G Gaidano
    T Pika
    K Weisel
    V Goranova-Marinova
    H H Gillenwater
    N Mohamed
    S Feng
    S Aggarwal
    R Hájek
    Leukemia, 2017, 31 : 1368 - 1374
  • [50] Isatuximab plus carfilzomib/dexamethasone versus carfilzomib/dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: IKEMA Phase III study design
    Moreau, Philippe
    Dimopoulos, Meletios A.
    Yong, Kwee
    Mikhael, Joseph
    Risse, Marie-Laure
    Asset, Gaelle
    Martin, Thomas
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 (02) : 4347 - 4358