Ten-Year Performance of Posterior 6-mm Implants with Single-Tooth Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:7
|
作者
Sahrmann, P. [1 ]
Naenni, N. [2 ]
Jung, R. E. [2 ]
Hammerle, C. H. F. [2 ]
Attin, T. [3 ]
Schmidlin, P. R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Univ Ctr Dent Med, Clin Periodontol Endodontol & Cariol, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent Med, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent Med, Clin Prevent Dent Periodontol & Cariol, Plattenstr 11, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
single-tooth dental implants; marginal bone level; dental radiography; alveolar bone loss; clinical research; peri-implantitis; SHORT DENTAL IMPLANTS; FOLLOW-UP; PROSPECTIVE COHORT; LONG IMPLANTS; SURVIVAL; SUCCESS; CROWNS; PREVENTION; OUTCOMES; PERIOD;
D O I
10.1177/00220345231170538
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of short dental implants (6-mm test group, TG) to longer implants (10-mm control group, CG) with single crown restorations after 10 y of loading. Patients requiring single-tooth replacement in the posterior jaws were randomly assigned to TG or CG. Implants were loaded with screw-retained single crowns after a healing period of 10 wk. Follow-up appointments were scheduled yearly and comprised patient-adapted oral hygiene reinstructions and polishing of all teeth and implants. After 10 y, clinical and radiographical parameters were assessed again. Out of initially 94 patients (47 in TG and CG, each), 70 (36 TG and 34 CG) could be reassessed. Survival rates accounted for 85.7% (TG) and 97.1% (CG), without significant intergroup difference (P = 0.072). All but 1 lost implant had been located in the lower jaw. These implants were not lost due to peri-implantitis but due to a late loss of osseointegration without signs of inflammation and with actually stable marginal bone levels (MBLs) over the investigation period. In general, MBLs were stable with medians (interquartile ranges) of 0.13 (0.78) mm and 0.08 (1.2) mm, for TG and CG, without significant intergroup differences. Crown-to-implant ratio showed a highly significant intergroup difference of 1.06 & PLUSMN; 0.18 mm and 0.73 & PLUSMN; 0.17 mm (P < 0.001). Few technical complications (i.e., screw loosening or chipping) were registered during the investigation period. In conclusion, given stringent professional maintenance, short dental implants with single-crown restorations show a slightly worse but statistically not different survival rate after 10 y, especially in the lower jaw, but can still be considered a valuable alternative, especially when vertical bone dimensions are limited (German Clinical Trials Registry: DRKS00006290).
引用
收藏
页码:1015 / 1021
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A 5-year prospective clinical trial on short implants (6mm) for single tooth replacement in the posterior maxilla: immediate versus delayed loading
    Ayna, Mustafa
    Wessing, Bastian
    Gutwald, Ralf
    Neff, Andreas
    Ziebart, Thomas
    Acil, Yahya
    Wiltfang, Joerg
    Guelses, Aydin
    ODONTOLOGY, 2019, 107 (02) : 244 - 253
  • [42] Clinical and radiographic outcome following immediate loading and delayed loading of single-tooth implants: Randomized clinical trial
    Gjelvold, Bjorn
    Kisch, Jeno
    Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
    Albrektsson, Tomas
    Wennerberg, Ann
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (03) : 549 - 558
  • [43] Impact of Crown-Implant Ratio of Single Restorations Supported by 6-mm Implants: A Short-Term Case Series Study
    Gulje, Felix L.
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Erkens, Ward A. L.
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (03) : 672 - 675
  • [44] Interproximal papilla levels following early versus delayed placement of single-tooth implants: A controlled clinical trial
    Schropp, L
    Isidor, F
    Kostopoulos, L
    Wenzel, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2005, 20 (05) : 753 - 761
  • [45] Clinical evaluation of small-diameter implants in single-tooth and multiple-implant restorations: A 7-year retrospective study
    Vigolo, P
    Givani, A
    Majzoub, Z
    Cordioli, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2004, 19 (05) : 703 - 709
  • [46] A retrospective evaluation of 1,387 single-tooth implants: A 6-year follow-up
    Levin, Liran
    Sadet, Paul
    Grossmann, Yoav
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2006, 77 (12) : 2080 - 2083
  • [47] Ten-Year Results of the Breast Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Randomized Controlled Trial
    Pignol, J. P.
    Truong, P.
    Rakovitch, E.
    Sattler, M. G. A.
    Miller, M.
    Whelan, T. J.
    Olivotto, I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : S5 - S5
  • [48] The Esthetic Effect of Veneered Zirconia Abutments for Single-Tooth Implant Reconstructions: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Brandenberg, Francine
    Fehmer, Vincent
    Knechtle, Nathalie
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Sailer, Irena
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (06) : 1210 - 1217
  • [49] Ten-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial in chronic hepatitis delta
    Wranke, Anika
    Hardtke, Svenja
    Heidrich, Benjamin
    Dalekos, George
    Yalcin, Kendal
    Tabak, Fehmi
    Gurel, Selim
    Cakaloglu, Yilmaz
    Akarca, Ulus S.
    Lammert, Frank
    Haeussinger, Dieter
    Mueller, Tobias
    Woebse, Michael
    Manns, Michael P.
    Idilman, Ramazan
    Cornberg, Markus
    Wedemeyer, Heiner
    Yurdaydin, Cihan
    JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, 2020, 27 (12) : 1359 - 1368
  • [50] Randomized controlled trial on the performance of direct and indirect composite restorations in patients with severe tooth wear
    Crins, L. A. M. J.
    Opdam, N. J. M.
    Kreulen, C. M.
    Bronkhorst, E. M.
    Sterenborg, B. A. M. M.
    Huysmans, M. C. D. N. J. M.
    Loomans, B. A. C.
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2021, 37 (11) : 1645 - 1654