Ten-Year Performance of Posterior 6-mm Implants with Single-Tooth Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:7
|
作者
Sahrmann, P. [1 ]
Naenni, N. [2 ]
Jung, R. E. [2 ]
Hammerle, C. H. F. [2 ]
Attin, T. [3 ]
Schmidlin, P. R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Univ Ctr Dent Med, Clin Periodontol Endodontol & Cariol, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent Med, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent Med, Clin Prevent Dent Periodontol & Cariol, Plattenstr 11, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
single-tooth dental implants; marginal bone level; dental radiography; alveolar bone loss; clinical research; peri-implantitis; SHORT DENTAL IMPLANTS; FOLLOW-UP; PROSPECTIVE COHORT; LONG IMPLANTS; SURVIVAL; SUCCESS; CROWNS; PREVENTION; OUTCOMES; PERIOD;
D O I
10.1177/00220345231170538
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of short dental implants (6-mm test group, TG) to longer implants (10-mm control group, CG) with single crown restorations after 10 y of loading. Patients requiring single-tooth replacement in the posterior jaws were randomly assigned to TG or CG. Implants were loaded with screw-retained single crowns after a healing period of 10 wk. Follow-up appointments were scheduled yearly and comprised patient-adapted oral hygiene reinstructions and polishing of all teeth and implants. After 10 y, clinical and radiographical parameters were assessed again. Out of initially 94 patients (47 in TG and CG, each), 70 (36 TG and 34 CG) could be reassessed. Survival rates accounted for 85.7% (TG) and 97.1% (CG), without significant intergroup difference (P = 0.072). All but 1 lost implant had been located in the lower jaw. These implants were not lost due to peri-implantitis but due to a late loss of osseointegration without signs of inflammation and with actually stable marginal bone levels (MBLs) over the investigation period. In general, MBLs were stable with medians (interquartile ranges) of 0.13 (0.78) mm and 0.08 (1.2) mm, for TG and CG, without significant intergroup differences. Crown-to-implant ratio showed a highly significant intergroup difference of 1.06 & PLUSMN; 0.18 mm and 0.73 & PLUSMN; 0.17 mm (P < 0.001). Few technical complications (i.e., screw loosening or chipping) were registered during the investigation period. In conclusion, given stringent professional maintenance, short dental implants with single-crown restorations show a slightly worse but statistically not different survival rate after 10 y, especially in the lower jaw, but can still be considered a valuable alternative, especially when vertical bone dimensions are limited (German Clinical Trials Registry: DRKS00006290).
引用
收藏
页码:1015 / 1021
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Success of 6-mm Implants with Single-Tooth Restorations: A 3-year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Sahrmann, P.
    Naenni, N.
    Jung, R. E.
    Held, U.
    Truninger, T.
    Haemmerle, C. H. F.
    Attin, T.
    Schmidlin, P. R.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2016, 95 (06) : 623 - 628
  • [3] Five-Year Survival of Short Single-Tooth Implants (6 mm): A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Naenni, N.
    Sahrmann, P.
    Schmidlin, P. R.
    Attin, T.
    Wiedemeier, D. B.
    Sapata, V.
    Hammerle, C. H. F.
    Jung, R. E.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 97 (08) : 887 - 892
  • [4] Single crowns in the posterior maxilla supported by either 11-mm long implants with sinus floor augmentation or by 6-mm long implants: A 10-year randomized controlled trial
    Gulje, Felix L.
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Gareb, Barzi
    Vissink, Arjan
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, : 89 - 100
  • [5] Single crown restorations supported by 6-mm implants in the resorbed posterior mandible: A 10-year prospective case series
    Gulje, Felix L.
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Gareb, Barzi
    Vissink, Arjan
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (03) : 642 - 650
  • [6] Single Restorations in the Resorbed Posterior Mandible Supported by 6-mm Implants: A 1-Year Prospective Case Series Study
    Gulje, Felix L.
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Vissink, Arjan
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 : E465 - E471
  • [7] Single crown restorations supported by 6-mm implants in the resorbed posterior mandible: A five-year prospective case series
    Guile, Felix L.
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Vissink, Arjan
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (05) : 1017 - 1022
  • [8] Ten-year Clinical Performance of Posterior Resin Composite Restorations
    Kraemer, Norbert
    Reinelt, Christian
    Frankenberger, Roland
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2015, 17 (05): : 433 - 441
  • [9] Aesthetic outcomes of different materials for delayed, single-tooth restorations for immediately placed implants. A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Zamora, Guillermo Pardo
    Molina-Gonzalez, Juan Manuel
    Martinez-Marco, Jose Francisco
    Ruiz, Antonio Jose Ortiz
    Mardas, Nikos
    Garcia-Sanchez, Ruben
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 146
  • [10] Feasibility of immediate placement of single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a1-year randomized controlled trial
    Slagter, Kirsten W.
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Bakker, Nicolaas A.
    Vissink, Arjan
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2015, 42 (08) : 773 - 782