Retrospective Evaluation of Moderate Sedation Visits That Used Oral Meperidine and Hydroxyzine With Oral or Intranasal Midazolam

被引:0
|
作者
Jain, Gaurav [1 ]
Curran, Ronald [1 ]
Jones, Robert S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Dent, Div Pediat Dent, Dept Surg & Dev Sci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
behavior guidance; sedation; pediatric dentistry; meperidine; hydroxyzine; midazolam; intranasal; CHLORAL HYDRATE; NITROUS-OXIDE; PHARMACOKINETICS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; DEXMEDETOMIDINE; FORMULATION; SUCCESS; EVENTS; NASAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To examine the influence of substituting intranasal (IN) midazolam (MID) for oral ( PO) MID, within the three-drug combination of meperidine ( MEP), hydroxyzine (H) and MID, on sedation treatment outcomes. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis examined patient variables and sedation outcomes in 508 pediatric dental patients sedated by single- and multi-drug seda-tion regimens (MEP-H; MEP-H-(PO)-MID; MEP-H-(IN)-MID; single-agent MID). The outcome assessment examined sedation visit effectiveness, sedation treatment completion, treatment time and medication administration to discharge time. Multi-variable logistic regression analyses assessed predictive variables associated with sedation visit effectiveness. Results: Both three-drug combinations (MEP-H-(PO)-MID; MEP-H-(IN)-MID) were used for behavior guidance in children of a similar age (median age=7.1 and 6.5 years, respectively, for the two drug combinations) and weight (median weight = 23.7 and 23.5 kg, respectively, for the two drug combinations). These three-drug com-binations had a higher likelihood of sedation effectiveness over the reference sedation regimen of single-agent midazolam ( MEP-H-(PO)-MID adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.65; 95 percent confidence interval [95% CI]=1.09 to 6.45; P=0.032; and MEP-H(IN)- MID OR=2.08; 95% CI=1.03 to 4.18; P=0.039). MEP-H-(IN)MID was asso-ciated with a shorter medication administration to discharge time for patients by 23 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]=9.5 to 34 minutes) compared to MEP- H-(PO) MID (P<0.05) while providing a comparable number of teeth treated (median=five). All sedation drug regimens, including MEP-H-(IN)MID, had high levels of oxygen saturation during all sedation appointments. Conclusion: Substituting IN for PO MID in MEP- H-MID was associated with a shorter total time to discharge while demonstrating comparable efficacy during sedation. ( J Dent Child 2023;90(3):139-46)
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 146
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine to midazolam regimens for oral sedation of pediatric dental patients
    Chowdhury, J
    Vargas, KG
    PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2005, 27 (03) : 191 - 197
  • [2] Diazepam, Meperidine, and Hydroxyzine as a Moderate Sedation Regimen in Pediatric Dentistry: A Retrospective Study
    Albaker, Taibah
    Carrico, Caroline
    Hawkins, Daniel
    Williams, Tiffany
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2025,
  • [3] Comparison of oral midazolam with and without hydroxyzine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients
    Shapira, J
    Kupietzky, A
    Kadari, A
    Fuks, AB
    Holan, G
    PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2004, 26 (06) : 492 - 496
  • [4] Combination of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam as sedation for pediatric MRI
    Cozzi, Giorgio
    Monasta, Lorenzo
    Maximova, Natalia
    Poropat, Federico
    Magnolato, Andrea
    Sbisa, Eugenio
    Norbedo, Stefania
    Sternissa, Giuliana
    Zanon, Davide
    Barbi, Egidio
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2017, 27 (09) : 976 - 977
  • [5] Oral midazolam for sedation in minor oral operations in children: A retrospective study
    Kohjitani, Atsushi
    Higuchi, Hitoshi
    Shimada, Masahiko
    Miyawaki, Takuya
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 46 (04): : 330 - 331
  • [6] EVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY OF AN INNOVATIVE ORAL FORMULATION OF MIDAZOLAM FOR MODERATE SEDATION IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS
    Guittet, C.
    Manso, M.
    Casagrande, L.
    Raffour, C.
    Dekens, J.
    Jezraoui, P.
    Legrand, A.
    Granier, L.
    Dupont, H.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 123 : 313 - 314
  • [8] Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of intranasal or oral ketamine-midazolam combinations compared to oral midazolam for outpatient pediatric sedation
    Sado-Filho, Joji
    Viana, Karolline Alves
    Correa-Faria, Patricia
    Costa, Luciane Rezende
    Costa, Paulo Sucasas
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [9] AN EVALUATION OF ORAL AND NASAL MIDAZOLAM FOR PEDIATRIC DENTAL SEDATION
    HARTGRAVES, PM
    PRIMOSCH, RE
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN, 1994, 61 (03): : 175 - 181
  • [10] Oral sedation with midazolam in blepharoplasty
    Rodrigues Goncalves, Rejane Dantas
    Velasco e Cruz, Antonio Augusto
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2009, 72 (05) : 665 - 668