Efficacy and safety of oral and sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Pergialiotis, Vasilios [1 ]
Panagiotopoulos, Michail [1 ]
Constantinou, Therapon [2 ]
Vogiatzi Vokotopoulou, Lito [1 ]
Koumenis, Andreas [2 ]
Stavros, Sofoklis [1 ]
Voskos, Andreas [2 ]
Daskalakis, George [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Alexandra Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 1, Lourou 2-4, Athens 11528, Greece
[2] Lab Expt Surg & Surg Res NS Christeas, Athens, Greece
关键词
Misoprostol; Oral; Sublingual; Induction of labour; Maternal morbidity; Neonatal morbidity; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; 25; MU-G; INTRAVAGINAL MISOPROSTOL; TERM; BLIND; ROUTES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-022-06867-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Misoprostol is a synthetic PGE(1) analogue that is used for induction of labour. Current guidelines support the use of doses that do not exceed 25 mcg in order to limit maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. The present meta-analysis investigates the efficacy and safety of oral compared to vaginally inserted misoprostol in terms of induction of labor and adverse peripartum outcomes. Methods We searched Medline, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases from inception till April 2022. Randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of oral misoprostol (per os or sublingual) compared to vaginally inserted misoprostol. Effect sizes were calculated in R. Sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the possibility of small study effects, p-hacking. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis according to the dose of misoprostol was also investigated. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by two independent reviewers using the risk of bias 2 tool. Quality of evidence for primary outcomes was evaluated under the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, ranging from very low to high. Results Overall, 57 studies were included that involved 10,975 parturient. Their risk of bias ranged between low-moderate. There were no differences among the routes of intake in terms of successful vaginal delivery within 24 h (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80) and cesarean section rates (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.82, 1.04). Sublingual misoprostol was superior compared to vaginal misoprostol in reducing the interval from induction to delivery (MD - 1.11 h, 95% CI - 2.06, - 0.17). On the other hand, per os misoprostol was inferior compared to vaginal misoprostol in terms of this outcome (MD 3.45 h, 95% CI 1.85, 5.06). Maternal and neonatal morbidity was not affected by the route or dose of misoprostol. Conclusion The findings of our study suggest that oral misoprostol intake is equally safe to vaginal misoprostol in terms of inducing labor at term. Sublingual intake seems to outperform the per os and vaginal routes without increasing the accompanying morbidity. Increasing the dose of misoprostol does not seem to increase its efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 775
页数:49
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The efficacy and safety of 25 μg or 50 μg oral misoprostol versus 25 μg vaginal misoprostol given at 4-or 6-hourly intervals for induction of labour in women at or beyond term with live singleton pregnancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yenuberi, Hilda
    Mathews, Jiji
    George, Anne
    Benjamin, Santosh
    Rathore, Swati
    Tirkey, Richa
    Tharyan, Prathap
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 164 (02) : 482 - 498
  • [22] Safety of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Taliento, Cristina
    Manservigi, Margherita
    Tormen, Mara
    Cappadona, Rosaria
    Piccolotti, Irene
    Salvioli, Stefano
    Scutiero, Gennaro
    Greco, Pantaleo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 289 : 108 - 128
  • [23] Oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Mogharbel, Hussain
    Rozzah, Rayyan
    D'Souza, Rohan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S177 - S178
  • [24] Comparison Between Use of Oral Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour at Term
    Prameela
    Sharma K.D.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2018, 68 (2) : 88 - 92
  • [25] Induction of labour with oral misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol: A before-after study
    Duvillier, C.
    Gams, J.
    Rousseau, A.
    Rozenberg, P.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2022, 50 (06): : 475 - 480
  • [26] THE STUDY OF COMPARISON OF SUBLINGUAL VERSUS VAGINAL 25 MICROGRAM OF MISOPROSTOL IN INDUCTION OF LABOUR AT TERM
    Raja, Zainab Z.
    Thakkar, Jigar K.
    Patel, Megha S.
    Joshi, Jayun J.
    Pandya, Janki M.
    Patel, Hetal
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2019, 8 (12): : 937 - 940
  • [27] Sublingual Versus Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labour in Prelabour Rupture of Membranes at Term
    Malik, Humaira Zaman
    Khawaja, Nuzhat Parveen
    Zahid, Bushra
    Rehman, Rakhshanda
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2010, 20 (04): : 242 - 245
  • [28] Inpatient versus outpatient induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Susan Dong
    Maria Khan
    Farahnosh Hashimi
    Caroline Chamy
    Rohan D’Souza
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20
  • [29] Efficacy and safety of sublingual versus subcutaneous immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Jiumei
    Lei, Sihong
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [30] EFFICACY OF SUBLINGUAL MISOPROSTOL VERSUS OXYTOCIN DRIP FOR INDUCTION AND AUGMENTATION OF LABOUR IN PROM
    Wadhwani, Rekha
    Gupta, Deepti
    Bangad, Neelam
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2013, 2 (04): : 388 - 391