Outcomes of Palliative Colonic Stent Placement in Malignant Colonic Obstruction: Experience from a Tertiary Care Oncology Center in India

被引:1
|
作者
Sundaram, Sridhar [1 ]
Rathod, Raosaheb [1 ]
Patil, Prachi [1 ,3 ]
Mane, Kiran [1 ]
Seth, Vishal [1 ]
Saklani, Avanish [2 ]
Desouza, Ashwin [2 ]
Mehta, Shaesta [1 ]
机构
[1] Homi Bhabha Natl Inst, Tata Mem Hosp, Dept Digest Dis & Clin Nutr, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[2] Homi Bhabha Natl Inst, Tata Mem Hosp, Dept Surg Oncol, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[3] Homi Bhabha Natl Inst, Tata Mem Hosp, Dept Digest Dis & Clin Nutr, Dr E Borges Rd, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India
关键词
obstruction; colorectal neoplasia; stents; treatment outcome; COLORECTAL OBSTRUCTION; ENDOSCOPIC PALLIATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1055/s-0042-1749073
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Colonic self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) placement is the preferred method for palliation of malignant colonic obstruction. We analyzed outcomes of patients who underwent colonic SEMS placement for palliation at a tertiary care oncology center in Western India.Methods Retrospective review of the endoscopy database was done for patients who underwent colonic SEMS placement at our center between January 2013 and September 2021. Demographic details, intent of stent placement, site of obstruction, length of stricture, technical success of stenting, clinical success, and complications (both immediate and long term) were noted.Results Sixty-one patients underwent colonic SEMS placement during the study period (mean age 53.6 years, 50.7% men). Obstruction was due to primary colonic malignancy in 43 (70.5%) patients and extracolonic malignancies in 18 (29.5%) patients. Most common extracolonic malignancy was gallbladder cancer in 8 (44.4%) patients. Most common site of obstruction was sigmoid colon in 18 (29.5%) patients. Proximal colonic obstruction was seen in 17 (27.9%) patients. Peritoneal metastases were seen in 26 (42.6%) patients. Colonoscopy revealed an impassable stenosis in 58 (95.1%) patients. Median length of stricture was 5 cm (range 2-9 cm). Technical success was achieved in 98.3% (60/61). Clinical success was achieved in 51 (86.4%) patients. Perforation during colonic SEMS placement was seen in 2 (3.4%) patients. Stent migration was seen in 3 (5.9%) patients, needing surgery for retrieval in all 3 patients. Over a median follow-up of 9 months (0-21 months), stent block was seen in 7 (13.7%) patients. Stent block developed after a median period of 6 months. Of these patients, three patients underwent SEMS placement within the SEMS and the other four patients underwent surgery.Conclusion Colonic SEMS placement achieves good palliation of malignant colonic obstruction in approximately 87% patients. Long-term complications like obstruction occur in a few patients after a median duration of 6 months.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 13
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Colonic polyps in children: experience from a tertiary care center in eastern province of north India
    Ghosh, Jayant
    Goyal, Sundeep
    Dixit, Vinod
    Jain, Ashok
    Ghosh, Jayant Kumar
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 29 : 270 - 270
  • [22] Inadvertent placement of a palliative colonic stent through a malignant colocolonic fistula, resulting in absolute large bowel obstruction
    Ventham, N. T.
    Masson, N. M.
    McAvoy, A.
    Boyce, S. A.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 44 : E192 - E193
  • [23] Palliative Stent for Malignant Colonic Obstruction by Extracolonic Malignancy: A Comparison with Colorectal Cancer
    Moon, Sung Jin
    Kim, Sang Woo
    Lee, Bo-In
    Lim, Chul-Hyun
    Kim, Jin Soo
    Cho, Yu Kyung
    Park, Jae Myung
    Lee, In Seok
    Choi, Myung-Gyu
    Choi, Kyu Yong
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2014, 59 (08) : 1891 - 1897
  • [24] Palliative Stent for Malignant Colonic Obstruction by Extracolonic Malignancy: A Comparison with Colorectal Cancer
    Sung Jin Moon
    Sang Woo Kim
    Bo-In Lee
    Chul-Hyun Lim
    Jin Soo Kim
    Yu Kyung Cho
    Jae Myung Park
    In Seok Lee
    Myung-Gyu Choi
    Kyu Yong Choi
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2014, 59 : 1891 - 1897
  • [25] CT Colonography after Metallic Stent Placement for Acute Malignant Colonic Obstruction
    Cha, Eun-Young
    Park, Seong Ho
    Lee, Seung Soo
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    Yoon, Sang Nam
    Shin, Yong Moon
    Kim, Ah Young
    Ha, Hyun Kwon
    RADIOLOGY, 2010, 254 (03) : 774 - 782
  • [26] Delayed colonic perforation after metal stent placement for malignant colorectal obstruction
    Trovato, C.
    Fiori, G.
    Ravizza, D.
    Tamayo, D.
    Zampino, M. G.
    Biffi, R.
    Crosta, C.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 38 : E96 - E96
  • [27] Factors Associated with Clinical Outcomes of Palliative Stenting for Malignant Colonic Obstruction
    Kwon, Sang-Jae
    Yoon, Jiyoung
    Oh, Eun Hye
    Kim, Jeongseok
    Ham, Nam Seok
    Hwang, Sung Wook
    Park, Sang Hyoung
    Ye, Byong Duk
    Byeon, Jeong-Sik
    Myung, Seung-Jae
    Yang, Suk-Kyun
    Yang, Dong-Hoon
    GUT AND LIVER, 2021, 15 (04) : 579 - 587
  • [28] Ultraflex Precision Colonic Stent for palliative treatment of colon obstruction due to malignant tumors
    Repici, A
    Dumas, R
    Fregonese, D
    Costamagna, G
    Freeman, J
    Kaehler, G
    Meisner, S
    Giovannini, M
    Young, C
    Roux, M
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (05) : AB187 - AB187
  • [29] Ultraflex precision colonic stent placement as a bridge to surgery in patients with malignant colon obstruction
    Fregonese, Diego
    Naspetti, Riccardo
    Ferrer, Salvador
    Gallego, Juan
    Costamagna, Guido
    Dumas, Remi
    Campaioli, Marcello
    Morante, Alfredo Lopez
    Mambrini, Pierre
    Meisner, Soren
    Repici, Alessandro
    Andreo, Luis
    Masci, Enzo
    Mingo, Alberto
    Barcenilla, Javier
    Petruzziello, Lucio
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (01) : 68 - 73
  • [30] Colonic perforation after stent placement for malignant colorectal obstruction - causes and contributing factors
    Datye, Arundhati
    Hersh, Jeff
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 20 (03) : 133 - 140