Efficacy and safety of esketamine for sedation among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Lian, Xianghong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lin, Yunzhu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luo, Ting [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jing, Yang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yuan, Hongbo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guo, Yixin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Second Univ Hosp, Dept Pharm, 20 Sect 3 Renmin Nan Lu, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Second Univ Hosp, Evidence Based Pharm Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Childr, Minist Educ, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Esketamine; Gastroscopy; Meta-analysis; Anesthesia; Propofol; PROPOFOL-BASED SEDATION; KETAMINE; REMIFENTANIL; RISK; COMPLICATIONS; COMBINATION; PROTOCOL; SURGERY; TRENDS; ERCP;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-023-02167-0
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundPatients who undergo gastrointestinal endoscopy often require propofol-based sedation combined with analgesics. At present, the efficacy and safety of esketamine as an adjunct to propofol for sedation during endoscopic procedures in patients remains controversial. Moreover, there is no universal agreement regarding the appropriate dose of esketamine supplementation. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of esketamine as an adjunct to propofol for sedation during endoscopic procedures in patients.MethodsSeven electronic databases and three clinical trial registry platforms were searched and the deadline was February 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of esketamine for sedation were included by two reviewers. Data from the eligible studies were combined to calculate the pooled risk ratio or standardized mean difference.ResultsEighteen studies with 1962 esketamine participants were included in the analysis. As an adjunct to propofol, the administration of esketamine reduced the recovery time compared to normal saline (NS). However, there was no significant difference between the opioids group and ketamine group. For propofol dosage, the administration of esketamine required a lower propofol dosage compared to the NS group and opioids group].For complications, the esketamine group had fewer complications compared to the NS group and opioid group in patients, but there were no significant differences between the esketamine group and ketamine group. Notably, the coadministration of esketamine was associated with a higher risk of visual disturbance compared to the NS group. In addition, we used subgroup analysis to investigate whether 0.2-0.5 mg/kg esketamine was effective and tolerable for patients.ConclusionEsketamine as an adjunct to propofol, is an appropriate effective alternative for sedation in participants undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. However, considering the possibility of its psychotomimetic effects, esketamine should be used with caution.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacoprophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ying Zhao
    Zhikang Ye
    Jianrui Lin
    Zhiqi Zhang
    Peirong Tian
    Zhongtao Zhang
    Peng Zhang
    Xiangli Cui
    Obesity Surgery, 2022, 32 : 1701 - 1718
  • [42] Safety and efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang, Bo
    Dai, Min
    Zou, Zhenhong
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 31 (05) : 921 - 928
  • [43] Efficacy and safety of perioperative melatonin for postoperative delirium in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shin, Hye Won
    Kwak, Ji Su
    Choi, Yoon Ji
    Kim, Jae Woo
    You, Hae Sun
    Shin, Hyun Ju
    Jang, Yoo Kyung
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 52 (05)
  • [44] Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacoprophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zhao, Ying
    Ye, Zhikang
    Lin, Jianrui
    Zhang, Zhiqi
    Tian, Peirong
    Zhang, Zhongtao
    Zhang, Peng
    Cui, Xiangli
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (05) : 1701 - 1718
  • [45] Comparison of propofol monotherapy and propofol combination therapy for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yoon, Sang Won
    Choi, Geun Joo
    Lee, Oh Haeng
    Yoon, Il Jae
    Kang, Hyun
    Baek, Chong Wha
    Jung, Yong Hun
    Woo, Young Cheol
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 30 (05) : 580 - 591
  • [46] Efficacy and Safety of Supportive Care Biosimilars Among Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jichun Yang
    Shuqing Yu
    Zhirong Yang
    Yusong Yan
    Yao Chen
    Hongmei Zeng
    Fei Ma
    Yanxia Shi
    Yehui Shi
    Zilu Zhang
    Feng Sun
    BioDrugs, 2019, 33 : 373 - 389
  • [47] Efficacy and Safety of Supportive Care Biosimilars Among Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Jichun
    Yu, Shuqing
    Yang, Zhirong
    Yan, Yusong
    Chen, Yao
    Zeng, Hongmei
    Ma, Fei
    Shi, Yanxia
    Shi, Yehui
    Zhang, Zilu
    Sun, Feng
    BIODRUGS, 2019, 33 (04) : 373 - 389
  • [48] Safety and efficacy of chloral hydrate for procedural sedation in paediatric ophthalmology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mataftsi, Asimina
    Malamaki, Paraskevi
    Prousali, Efthymia
    Riga, Paraskevi
    Lathyris, Dimitrios
    Chalvatzis, Nikolaos T.
    Haidich, Anna-Bettina
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 101 (10) : 1423 - 1430
  • [49] Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bahji, Anees
    Vazquez, Gustavo H.
    Zarate, Carlos A., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2021, 278 : 542 - 555
  • [50] Efficacy and Safety of Ranolazine in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zeng, Xiaofang
    Zhang, Yinyin
    Lin, Jianhui
    Zheng, Haikuo
    Peng, Jie
    Huang, Wei
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2018, 52 (05) : 415 - 424