Efficacy and safety of esketamine for sedation among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Lian, Xianghong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lin, Yunzhu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luo, Ting [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jing, Yang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yuan, Hongbo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guo, Yixin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Second Univ Hosp, Dept Pharm, 20 Sect 3 Renmin Nan Lu, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Second Univ Hosp, Evidence Based Pharm Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Childr, Minist Educ, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Esketamine; Gastroscopy; Meta-analysis; Anesthesia; Propofol; PROPOFOL-BASED SEDATION; KETAMINE; REMIFENTANIL; RISK; COMPLICATIONS; COMBINATION; PROTOCOL; SURGERY; TRENDS; ERCP;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-023-02167-0
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundPatients who undergo gastrointestinal endoscopy often require propofol-based sedation combined with analgesics. At present, the efficacy and safety of esketamine as an adjunct to propofol for sedation during endoscopic procedures in patients remains controversial. Moreover, there is no universal agreement regarding the appropriate dose of esketamine supplementation. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of esketamine as an adjunct to propofol for sedation during endoscopic procedures in patients.MethodsSeven electronic databases and three clinical trial registry platforms were searched and the deadline was February 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of esketamine for sedation were included by two reviewers. Data from the eligible studies were combined to calculate the pooled risk ratio or standardized mean difference.ResultsEighteen studies with 1962 esketamine participants were included in the analysis. As an adjunct to propofol, the administration of esketamine reduced the recovery time compared to normal saline (NS). However, there was no significant difference between the opioids group and ketamine group. For propofol dosage, the administration of esketamine required a lower propofol dosage compared to the NS group and opioids group].For complications, the esketamine group had fewer complications compared to the NS group and opioid group in patients, but there were no significant differences between the esketamine group and ketamine group. Notably, the coadministration of esketamine was associated with a higher risk of visual disturbance compared to the NS group. In addition, we used subgroup analysis to investigate whether 0.2-0.5 mg/kg esketamine was effective and tolerable for patients.ConclusionEsketamine as an adjunct to propofol, is an appropriate effective alternative for sedation in participants undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. However, considering the possibility of its psychotomimetic effects, esketamine should be used with caution.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of esketamine for sedation among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xianghong Lian
    Yunzhu Lin
    Ting Luo
    Yang Jing
    Hongbo Yuan
    Yixin Guo
    BMC Anesthesiology, 23
  • [2] Safety and efficacy of the combination of esketamine and propofol in procedural sedation/analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Xiaoci
    Lin, Fong
    Chen, Qi
    Hu, Xianwen
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2023, 89 (7-8) : 680 - 689
  • [3] The Safety of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy With Conscious Sedation in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Patel, Brijesh
    Andrade, Christian
    Kumar, Ambuj
    Rodriguez, Andrea C.
    Lipka, Seth
    Vidyarthi, Gitanjali
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 : S942 - S942
  • [4] Efficacy and safety of esketamine for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Yu, Yunfeng
    Deng, Juan
    Tong, Keke
    Yin, Yuman
    Yu, Rong
    Tan, Chuanchuan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [5] Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation of adults undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Kang, Hyun
    Choi, Geun Joo
    Baek, Chong Wha
    Jung, Yong Hun
    Woo, Young Cheol
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 29 : 81 - 82
  • [6] Safety of Propofol versus Nonpropofol-Based Sedation in Children Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Narula, Neeraj
    Masood, Sameer
    Shojaee, Samira
    McGuinness, Brandon
    Sabeti, Saama
    Buchan, Arianne
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2018, 2018
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of low-dose esketamine for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy in adults: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis
    Deng, Juan
    Yu, Yun-Feng
    Tang, Zheng-Guo
    Lei, Hua-Juan
    Tan, Chuan-Chuan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [8] Use of Remimazolam for Sedation in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Leung, Choy-May
    Hui, Rex Wan-Hin
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2024, 139 (06): : 1872 - 1873
  • [9] The efficacy and safety of esketamine in pediatric anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Bin-Sen
    Zhang, Xiao-Jia
    Wang, Chun-ai
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (12) : 5661 - 5663
  • [10] Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between dexmedetomidine and propofol among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis
    Liu, Weihua
    Yu, Wenli
    Yu, Hongli
    Sheng, Mingwei
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (07)