An implementation science approach to the systematic study of access to gynecologic cancer care

被引:1
|
作者
Shalowitz, David I. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Schroeder, Mary C. [2 ,3 ]
Birken, Sarah A. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] West Michigan Canc Ctr, Kalamazoo, MI USA
[2] Collaborat Equ Rural Canc Care, Kalamazoo, MI USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Coll Pharm, Div Hlth Serv Res, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Implementat Sci, Winston Salem, NC USA
[5] West Michigan Canc Ctr, 200 N Pk St, Kalamazoo, MI 49007 USA
关键词
Access to care; Cancer care delivery research; Gynecologic cancers; Health equity; Implementation science;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.03.012
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction. Barriers to access to cancer care are profoundly threatening to patients with gynecologic malig-nancies. Implementation science focuses on empirical investigation of factors influencing delivery of clinical best practices, as well as interventions designed to improve delivery of evidence-based care. We outline one prominent framework for conducting implementation research and discuss its application to improving access to gynecologic cancer care. Methods. Literature on the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was reviewed. Delivery of cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma was selected as an illustrative case of an evidence-based intervention (EBI) in gynecologic oncology. CFIR domains were applied to the context of cytoreductive surgical care, highlighting examples of empirically-assessable determinants of care delivery. Results. CFIR domains include Innovation, Inner Setting, Outer Setting, Individuals, and Implementation Process. "Innovation" relates to characteristics of the surgical intervention itself; "Inner Setting" relates to the environment in which surgery is delivered. "Outer Setting" refers to the broader care environment influencing the Inner Setting. "Individuals" highlights attributes of persons directly involved in care delivery, and "Implemen-tation Process" focuses on integration of the Innovation within the Inner Setting. Conclusions. Prioritization of implementation science methods in the study of access to gynecologic cancer care will help ensure that patients are able to utilize interventions with the greatest prospect of benefiting them. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 81
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A qualitative study of patients' attitudes towards telemedicine for gynecologic cancer care
    Kraus, Evan J.
    Nicosia, Brittany
    Shalowitz, David, I
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 165 (01) : 155 - 159
  • [32] The benefits of a gynecologic oncologist: a pattern of care study for endometrial cancer treatment
    Roland, PY
    Kelly, FJ
    Kulwicki, CY
    Blitzer, P
    Curcio, M
    Orr, JW
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 93 (01) : 125 - 130
  • [33] Improving integration of psychosocial care into routine cancer care: The untapped potential of implementation science
    Jacobsen, Paul
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 28 : 29 - 29
  • [34] Transforming digital data into cancer care practice: Implementation science in action
    Philpot, Shoni
    Cossio, Danica
    Walpole, Euan
    Walker, Roderick
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 : 67 - 68
  • [35] Implementation science of district cancer care delivery model (Pendharkar model).
    Pendharkar, Dinesh
    Tripathi, Chandramauli
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [36] Using Implementation Science to Examine the Impact of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans
    Selove, Rebecca
    Birken, Sarah A.
    Skolarus, Ted A.
    Hahn, Erin E.
    Sales, Anne
    Proctor, Enola K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (32) : 3834 - +
  • [37] Leveraging Implementation Science to Improve Cancer Care Delivery and Patient Outcomes
    Mitchell, Sandra A.
    Chambers, David A.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2017, 13 (08) : 523 - +
  • [38] Systematic Approach to Providing Breast Cancer Survivors With Survivorship Care Plans: A Feasibility Study
    Bulloch, Kaleigh J.
    Irwin, Melinda L.
    Chagpar, Anees B.
    Pusztai, Lajos
    Killelea, Brigid K.
    Horowitz, Nina R.
    Hofstatter, Erin W.
    Abu-Khalaf, Maysa M.
    DiGiovanna, Michael
    Chung, Gina G.
    Sanft, Tara B.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2015, 11 (02) : E170 - U330
  • [39] A Qualitative Assessment of Patient Experience following Systematic Implementation of Goals of Care Conversations in the Ambulatory Gynecologic Oncology Setting
    Zanolli, Nicole C.
    Gatta, Luke A.
    Fish, Laura
    Falkovic, Margaret
    Lorenzo, Amelia
    Puechl, Allison M.
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    Davidson, Brittany
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2022, 3 (01): : 308 - 315
  • [40] A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO CLOSING EVIDENCE GAPS IN CANCER CARE
    Shaw, Tim
    Rankin, Nicole
    McGregor, Deborah
    White, Kate
    Phillips, Jane
    Butow, Phyllis
    Young, Jane
    Trevena, Lyndal
    Pearson, Sallie
    York, Sarah
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 10 : 22 - 22