Development and external validation of a multivariable [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-based prediction model for lymph node involvement in men with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer

被引:7
|
作者
Muehlematter, Urs J. [1 ,2 ]
Schweiger, Lilit [3 ]
Ferraro, Daniela A. [1 ,4 ]
Hermanns, Thomas [5 ]
Maurer, Tobias [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Heck, Matthias M. [6 ]
Rupp, Niels J. [9 ]
Eiber, Matthias [3 ]
Rauscher, Isabel [3 ]
Burger, Irene A. [1 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Nucl Med, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Nucl Med, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med FMUSP, Dept Radiol & Oncol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Urol, Zurich, Switzerland
[6] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Urol, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[7] Univ Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
[8] Univ Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin, Hamburg, Germany
[9] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Pathol & Mol Pathol, Zurich, Switzerland
[10] Baden Cantonal Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Baden, Switzerland
关键词
Prostate cancer; Lymph node invasion; Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography; Prediction; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; GLEASON SCORE; DISSECTION; ANTIGEN; NOMOGRAM; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-023-06278-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo develop and evaluate a lymph node invasion (LNI) prediction model for men staged with [Ga-68]Ga-PSMA-11 PET.MethodsA consecutive sample of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing [Ga-68]Ga-PSMA-11 PET, extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND), and radical prostatectomy (RP) at two tertiary referral centers were retrospectively identified. The training cohort comprised 173 patients (treated between 2013 and 2017), the validation cohort 90 patients (treated between 2016 and 2019). Three models for LNI prediction were developed and evaluated using cross-validation. Optimal risk-threshold was determined during model development. The best performing model was evaluated and compared to available conventional and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-based prediction models using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsA combined model including prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason grade group, [Ga-68]Ga Ga-PSMA-11 positive volume of the primary tumor, and the assessment of the [Ga-68]Ga-PSMA-11 report N-status yielded an AUC of 0.923 (95% CI 0.863-0.984) in the external validation. Using a cutoff of >= 17%, 44 (50%) ePLNDs would be spared and LNI missed in one patient (4.8%). Compared to conventional and MRI-based models, the proposed model showed similar calibration, higher AUC (0.923 (95% CI 0.863-0.984) vs. 0.700 (95% CI 0.548-0.852)-0.824 (95% CI 0.710-0.938)) and higher net benefit at DCA.ConclusionsOur results indicate that information from [Ga-68]Ga-PSMA-11 may improve LNI prediction in intermediate to high-risk PCa patients undergoing primary staging especially when combined with clinical parameters. For better LNI prediction, future research should investigate the combination of information from both PSMA PET and mpMRI for LNI prediction in PCa patients before RP.
引用
收藏
页码:3137 / 3146
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Synthesis of 68Ga-radiopharmaceuticals using both generator-derived and cyclotron-produced 68Ga as exemplified by [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 for prostate cancer PET imaging
    Rodnick, Melissa E.
    Sollert, Carina
    Stark, Daniela
    Clark, Mara
    Katsifis, Andrew
    Hockley, Brian G.
    Parr, D. Christian
    Frigell, Jens
    Henderson, Bradford D.
    Bruton, Laura
    Preshlock, Sean
    Abghari-Gerst, Monica
    Piert, Morand R.
    Fulham, Michael J.
    Eberl, Stefan
    Gagnon, Katherine
    Scott, Peter J. H.
    NATURE PROTOCOLS, 2022, 17 (04) : 980 - 1003
  • [42] Assessing dynamic metabolic heterogeneity in prostate cancer patients via total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging: quantitative analysis of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in pathological lesions and normal organs
    Chen, Ruohua
    Ng, Yee Ling
    Yang, Xinlan
    Zhu, Yinjie
    Li, Lianghua
    Zhao, Haitao
    Huang, Gang
    Liu, Jianjun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2024, 51 (03) : 896 - 906
  • [43] Prospective comparison of simultaneous [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR versus PET/CT in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer
    Sander Jentjens
    Cindy Mai
    Niloefar Ahmadi Bidakhvidi
    Liesbeth De Coster
    Nathalie Mertens
    Michel Koole
    Wouter Everaerts
    Steven Joniau
    Raymond Oyen
    Koen Van Laere
    Karolien Goffin
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 901 - 911
  • [44] 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET has the potential to improve patient selection for extended pelvic lymph node dissection in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer
    Daniela A. Ferraro
    Urs J. Muehlematter
    Helena I. Garcia Schüler
    Niels J. Rupp
    Martin Huellner
    Michael Messerli
    Jan Hendrik Rüschoff
    Edwin E. G. W. ter Voert
    Thomas Hermanns
    Irene A. Burger
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2020, 47 : 147 - 159
  • [45] 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET has the potential to improve patient selection for extended pelvic lymph node dissection in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer
    Ferraro, Daniela A.
    Muehlematter, Urs J.
    Garcia Schuler, Helena I.
    Rupp, Niels J.
    Huellner, Martin
    Messerli, Michael
    Ruschoff, Jan Hendrik
    ter Voert, Edwin E. G. W.
    Hermanns, Thomas
    Burger, Irene A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2020, 47 (01) : 147 - 159
  • [46] [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 as a PSMA-Targeted PET Radiopharmaceutical for Detection of Cancer: Initial Evaluation and Comparison with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in Prostate Cancer Patients Presenting with Biochemical Recurrence
    Mark A. Green
    Gary D. Hutchins
    Clinton D. Bahler
    Mark Tann
    Carla J. Mathias
    Wendy Territo
    Justin Sims
    Heather Polson
    David Alexoff
    William C. Eckelman
    Hank F. Kung
    James W. Fletcher
    Molecular Imaging and Biology, 2020, 22 : 752 - 763
  • [47] Evaluating the prognostic value of radiomics and clinical features in metastatic prostate cancer using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT
    Molin, Kaylee
    Barry, Nathaniel
    Gill, Suki
    Hassan, Ghulam Mubashar
    Francis, Roslyn J.
    Ong, Jeremy S. L.
    Ebert, Martin A.
    Kendrick, Jake
    PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2025, : 329 - 341
  • [48] Role of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET radiomics to predict post-surgical ISUP grade in primary prostate cancer
    Ghezzo, Samuele
    Mapelli, Paola
    Bezzi, Carolina
    Samanes Gajate, Ana Maria
    Brembilla, Giorgio
    Gotuzzo, Irene
    Russo, Tommaso
    Preza, Erik
    Cucchiara, Vito
    Ahmed, Naghia
    Neri, Ilaria
    Mongardi, Sofia
    Freschi, Massimo
    Briganti, Alberto
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    Gianolli, Luigi
    Scifo, Paola
    Picchio, Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2023, 50 (08) : 2548 - 2560
  • [49] [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 as a PSMA-Targeted PET Radiopharmaceutical for Detection of Cancer: Initial Evaluation and Comparison with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in Prostate Cancer Patients Presenting with Biochemical Recurrence
    Green, Mark A.
    Hutchins, Gary D.
    Bahler, Clinton D.
    Tann, Mark
    Mathias, Carla J.
    Territo, Wendy
    Sims, Justin
    Polson, Heather
    Alexoff, David
    Eckelman, William C.
    Kung, Hank F.
    Fletcher, James W.
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 22 (03) : 752 - 763
  • [50] Lymph node staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer suitable for radical prostatectomy managed in a prostate cancer unit
    Maestroni, Umberto Vittorio
    Campobasso, Davide
    Guarino, Giulio
    Acampora, Anna
    Scarlattei, Maura
    Ziglioli, Francesco
    Dinale, Francesco
    Baldari, Giorgio
    Migliari, Silvia
    Gasparro, Donatello
    Ferretti, Stefania
    Silini, Enrico Maria
    Ruffini, Livia
    CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 12 (03)