Economic Evaluation of Three BRAF plus MEK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Advanced Unresectable Melanoma With BRAF Mutation From a US Payer Perspective

被引:3
|
作者
Halloush, Shiraz [1 ]
Alkhatib, Nimer S. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Almutairi, Abdulaali R. [5 ]
Calamia, Mathias [4 ]
Halawah, Hala [4 ]
Obeng-Kusi, Mavis [4 ]
Hoyle, Martin [6 ]
Rashdan, Omar [7 ]
Koeller, Jim [8 ,9 ]
Abraham, Ivo [4 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Appl Sci Private Univ, Fac Pharm, Amman, Jordan
[2] Al Zaytoonah Univ Jordan, Fac Pharm, Amman 11733, Jordan
[3] Pi Pharm Intelligence, Amman, Jordan
[4] Univ Arizona, Ctr Hlth Outcomes & Pharmaco Econ Res, Tucson, AZ USA
[5] Saudi Food & Drug Author, Drug Sect, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[6] Macquarie Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] Middle East Univ, Coll Pharm, Amman, Jordan
[8] Univ Texas Austin, Coll Pharm, Austin, TX USA
[9] UT Hlth, Pharmacotherapy Educ & Res Ctr, San Antonio, TX USA
[10] Univ Arizona, Dept Pharm Practice & Sci, R Ken Coit Coll Pharm, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
advanced melanoma; BRAF; MEK; cost-effectiveness analysis; cost-utility analysis; HEALTH STATE UTILITIES; COST-EFFECTIVENESS;
D O I
10.1177/10600280221146878
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: The combinations of BRAF + MEK inhibitors-encorafenib (ENC) + binimetinib (BIN), cobimetinib (COB) + vemurafenib (VEM), and dabrafenib (DAB) + trametinib (TRA)-are recommended for the treatment of BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of ENC + BIN versus COB + VEM versus DAB + TRA from a US payer perspective. Methods: A Markov model was constructed to simulate a hypothetical cohort over a time horizon of 10 years. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were independently digitized from a randomized controlled trial for ENC + BIN and fitted using R software. Published and indirectly estimated hazard ratios were used to fit OS and PFS curves for COB + VEM and DAB + TRA. Costs, life-year gains, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with the 3 treatment combinations were estimated. A base case analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted to estimate the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR). A discount rate of 3.5% was applied on cost and outcomes. Results: The ENC + BIN versus COB + VEM comparison was associated with an ICUR of $656 233 per QALY gained. The ENC + BIN versus DAB + TRA comparison was associated with an ICUR of $3 135 269 per QALY gained. The DAB + TRA combination dominated COB + VEM. The base case analysis estimates were confirmed by the PSA estimates. ENC + BIN was the most cost-effective combination at a high willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $573 000 per QALY and $1.5 million/QALY when compared to COB + VEM and DAB + TRA, respectively. Conclusion and Relevance: Given current prices and acceptable WTP thresholds, our study suggests that DAB + TRA is the optimum treatment. In this study, ENC + BIN was cost-effective only at a very high WTP per QALY threshold.
引用
收藏
页码:1016 / 1024
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Precision oncology for BRAF-mutant cancers with BRAF and MEK inhibitors: from melanoma to tissue-agnostic therapy
    Gouda, M. A.
    Subbiah, V.
    ESMO OPEN, 2023, 8 (02)
  • [42] Macrophage activation syndrome associated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors during adjuvant treatment of melanoma
    Demarez, B.
    Ete, M.
    David, L.
    Quiles, N.
    Archier, E.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2022, 36 (09) : E688 - E689
  • [43] From targeted monotherapy to combined BRAF-MEK inhibitors and integrated genome analysis for melanoma treatment
    Roukos, Dimitrios H.
    Papaloukas, Costas
    Tzaphlidou, Margaret
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2013, 9 (01) : 5 - 8
  • [44] Dabrafenib plus Trametinib: a Review in Advanced Melanoma with a BRAF V600 Mutation
    Dhillon, Sohita
    TARGETED ONCOLOGY, 2016, 11 (03) : 417 - 428
  • [45] Efficacy and tolerance of BRAF and MEK inhibitors on metastatic melanoma carrying the orphan pV600_K601 delinsE mutation of the BRAF gene
    Barbe, Jordane
    Garnier, Margaux
    Tallet, Anne
    Collin, Christine
    Leducq, Sophie
    Routier, Emilie
    Machet, Laurent
    Samimi, Mahtab
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 60 (07) : E283 - E284
  • [46] Budget Impact of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Combination as Adjuvant Treatment of BRAF V600E/K Mutation-Positive Melanoma from a US Commercial Payer Perspective
    Stellato, Daniel
    Gerbasi, Margaret E.
    Ndife, Briana
    Ghate, Sameer R.
    Moynahan, Aaron
    Mishra, Dinesh
    Gunda, Praveen
    Koruth, Roy
    Delea, Thomas E.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2019, 25 (11): : 1227 - +
  • [47] Exposure–response analyses of BRAF- and MEK-inhibitors dabrafenib plus trametinib in melanoma patients
    Stefanie L. Groenland
    J. M. Janssen
    C. M. Nijenhuis
    N. de Vries
    H. Rosing
    S. Wilgenhof
    J. V. van Thienen
    J. B. A. G. Haanen
    C. U. Blank
    J. H. Beijnen
    A. D. R. Huitema
    N. Steeghs
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2023, 91 : 447 - 456
  • [48] Cost-effectiveness of new therapies in first-line treatment of advanced melanoma for patients with independent BRAF mutation status from a Brazilian private payer perspective.
    Matteucci, Christina
    Lima, Joao P. S. D. N.
    Bernardino, Graziela
    Oliveira, Ana Paula
    Maia, Daniela Galdeano
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [49] Neoadjuvant cytoreductive treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibition of prior unresectable regionally advanced melanoma to allow complete surgical resection, REDUCTOR trial
    Blankenstein, S.
    Rohaan, M. W.
    Klop, W. M. C.
    van der Hiel, B.
    van de Wiel, B.
    Peeper, D.
    van Akkooi, A. C. J.
    Haanen, J. B. A. G.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [50] Combination therapy of BRAF inhibitors for advanced melanoma with BRAF V600 mutation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Siin
    Kim, Hyung Tae
    Suh, Hae Sun
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2018, 29 (03) : 314 - 321