Economic Evaluation of Three BRAF plus MEK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Advanced Unresectable Melanoma With BRAF Mutation From a US Payer Perspective

被引:3
|
作者
Halloush, Shiraz [1 ]
Alkhatib, Nimer S. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Almutairi, Abdulaali R. [5 ]
Calamia, Mathias [4 ]
Halawah, Hala [4 ]
Obeng-Kusi, Mavis [4 ]
Hoyle, Martin [6 ]
Rashdan, Omar [7 ]
Koeller, Jim [8 ,9 ]
Abraham, Ivo [4 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Appl Sci Private Univ, Fac Pharm, Amman, Jordan
[2] Al Zaytoonah Univ Jordan, Fac Pharm, Amman 11733, Jordan
[3] Pi Pharm Intelligence, Amman, Jordan
[4] Univ Arizona, Ctr Hlth Outcomes & Pharmaco Econ Res, Tucson, AZ USA
[5] Saudi Food & Drug Author, Drug Sect, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[6] Macquarie Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] Middle East Univ, Coll Pharm, Amman, Jordan
[8] Univ Texas Austin, Coll Pharm, Austin, TX USA
[9] UT Hlth, Pharmacotherapy Educ & Res Ctr, San Antonio, TX USA
[10] Univ Arizona, Dept Pharm Practice & Sci, R Ken Coit Coll Pharm, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
advanced melanoma; BRAF; MEK; cost-effectiveness analysis; cost-utility analysis; HEALTH STATE UTILITIES; COST-EFFECTIVENESS;
D O I
10.1177/10600280221146878
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: The combinations of BRAF + MEK inhibitors-encorafenib (ENC) + binimetinib (BIN), cobimetinib (COB) + vemurafenib (VEM), and dabrafenib (DAB) + trametinib (TRA)-are recommended for the treatment of BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of ENC + BIN versus COB + VEM versus DAB + TRA from a US payer perspective. Methods: A Markov model was constructed to simulate a hypothetical cohort over a time horizon of 10 years. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were independently digitized from a randomized controlled trial for ENC + BIN and fitted using R software. Published and indirectly estimated hazard ratios were used to fit OS and PFS curves for COB + VEM and DAB + TRA. Costs, life-year gains, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with the 3 treatment combinations were estimated. A base case analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted to estimate the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR). A discount rate of 3.5% was applied on cost and outcomes. Results: The ENC + BIN versus COB + VEM comparison was associated with an ICUR of $656 233 per QALY gained. The ENC + BIN versus DAB + TRA comparison was associated with an ICUR of $3 135 269 per QALY gained. The DAB + TRA combination dominated COB + VEM. The base case analysis estimates were confirmed by the PSA estimates. ENC + BIN was the most cost-effective combination at a high willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $573 000 per QALY and $1.5 million/QALY when compared to COB + VEM and DAB + TRA, respectively. Conclusion and Relevance: Given current prices and acceptable WTP thresholds, our study suggests that DAB + TRA is the optimum treatment. In this study, ENC + BIN was cost-effective only at a very high WTP per QALY threshold.
引用
收藏
页码:1016 / 1024
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BRAF and MEK inhibitors in therapy of advanced melanoma
    Kosela, Hanna
    Switaj, Tomasz
    Rutkowski, Piotr
    ONCOLOGY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 7 (05): : 246 - 253
  • [2] BRAF and MEK inhibition for the treatment of advanced BRAF mutant melanoma
    Richman, Juliet
    Martin-Liberal, Juan
    Diem, Stefan
    Larkin, James
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2015, 16 (09) : 1285 - 1297
  • [3] Network indirect comparison of 3 BRAF + MEK inhibitors for the treatment of advanced BRAF mutated melanoma
    F. Consoli
    M. Bersanelli
    G. Perego
    S. Grisanti
    B. Merelli
    A. Berruti
    F. Petrelli
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2020, 22 : 900 - 907
  • [4] Patient with stage IV melanoma with BRAF mutation - immunotherapy or BRAF and MEK inhibitors?
    Cybulska-Stopa, Bozena
    Ziobro, Marek
    ONCOLOGY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 14 (02): : 100 - 103
  • [5] Network indirect comparison of 3 BRAF + MEK inhibitors for the treatment of advanced BRAF mutated melanoma
    Consoli, F.
    Bersanelli, M.
    Perego, G.
    Grisanti, S.
    Merelli, B.
    Berruti, A.
    Petrelli, F.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 22 (06): : 900 - 907
  • [6] Management of toxicities of BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors in advanced melanoma
    Sibaud, Vincent
    Baric, Lilian
    Cantagrel, Alain
    Di Palma, Mario
    Ederhy, Stephane
    Paques, Michel
    Perlemuter, Gabriel
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2021, 108 (05) : 528 - 543
  • [7] Concurrent MEK2 Mutation and BRAF Amplification Confer Resistance to BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in Melanoma
    Villanueva, Jessie
    Infante, Jeffrey R.
    Krepler, Clemens
    Reyes-Uribe, Patricia
    Samanta, Minu
    Chen, Hsin-Yi
    Li, Bin
    Swoboda, Rolf K.
    Wilson, Melissa
    Vultur, Adina
    Fukunaba-Kalabis, Mizuho
    Wubbenhorst, Bradley
    Chen, Thomas Y.
    Liu, Qin
    Sproesser, Katrin
    DeMarini, Douglas J.
    Gilmer, Tona M.
    Martin, Anne-Marie
    Marmorstein, Ronen
    Schultz, David C.
    Speicher, David W.
    Karakousis, Giorgos C.
    Xu, Wei
    Amaravadi, Ravi K.
    Xu, Xiaowei
    Schuchter, Lynn M.
    Herlyn, Meenhard
    Nathanson, Katherine L.
    CELL REPORTS, 2013, 4 (06): : 1090 - 1099
  • [8] A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab with BRAF plus MEK inhibitors for the treatment of BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma
    Tarhini, A. A.
    Toor, K.
    Chan, K.
    McDermott, D. F.
    Mohr, P.
    Larkin, J.
    Hodi, F. S.
    Lee, C-H
    Rizzo, J., I
    Johnson, H.
    Moshyk, A.
    Rao, S.
    Kotapati, S.
    Atkins, M. B.
    ESMO OPEN, 2021, 6 (02)
  • [9] BRAF plus MEK-targeted drugs: a new standard of treatment for BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma
    Queirolo, Paola
    Spagnolo, Francesco
    CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 2017, 36 (01) : 35 - 42
  • [10] BRAF plus MEK-targeted drugs: a new standard of treatment for BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma
    Paola Queirolo
    Francesco Spagnolo
    Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 2017, 36 : 35 - 42