PD-L1 testing in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Interobserver and interplatform reproducibility of CE-IVD assays for CPS and IC scores

被引:1
|
作者
Ivanova, Mariia [1 ]
Frascarelli, Chiara [1 ,2 ]
Cerbelli, Bruna [3 ]
Pignataro, Maria Gemma [3 ]
Pernazza, Angelina [3 ]
Venetis, Konstantinos [1 ]
Sajjadi, Elham [1 ,2 ]
Criscitiello, Carmen [2 ,4 ]
Curigliano, Giuseppe [2 ,4 ]
Guerini-Rocco, Elena [1 ,2 ]
Graziano, Paolo [5 ]
Martini, Maurizio [6 ]
d'Amati, Giulia [3 ]
Fusco, Nicola [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IEO, European Inst Oncol, Div Pathol, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Oncol & Hematooncol, Milan, Italy
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Med Surg Sci & Biotechnol, Rome, Italy
[4] IEO, European Inst Oncol, Div New Drugs & Early Drug Dev Innovat Therapies, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
[5] Fdn IRCCS Casa Sollievo Sofferenza, Unit Pathol, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
[6] Univ Messina, Dept Human & Dev Pathol, MCessina, Italy
关键词
Breast cancer; TNBC; Metastatic TNBC; PD-L1; CPS; IC; Immunotherapy; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMMUNOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.humpath.2024.01.008
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
PD -L1 test is recommended in different types of tumors to select patients eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) therapy. Several factors make this test challenging in metastatic triple -negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Different assays and platforms are available, each associated with distinct scoring systems and threshold values specific to the ICI compound used, i.e. CPS >= 10 for pembrolizumab and IC >= 1 % for atezolizumab. Our objective was to assess the consistency of PD -L1 testing in mTNBC by examining interobserver and interassay reproducibility. We assessed n = 60 mTNBC samples for PD -L1 testing using 22C3 pharmDx assay on a Dako Autostainer Link 48 and VENTANA PD -L1 (SP263) on a Ventana BenchMark Ultra. Additionally, a subset of n = 19 samples was tested using the SP142 assay, also on the Ventana BenchMark Ultra. CPS with both 22C3 and SP263 was independently evaluated by five pathologists, all certified PD -L1 trainers. The IC with SP142 was assessed by three of these pathologists, who have particular expertise in breast pathology. Following the computation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for each assay and their respective thresholds, we assessed the agreement between different raters and assays using Fleiss's kappa, with a 95 % confidence interval (CI). Overall, we observed a significant (p < 0.001) ICC with both CPS assays [22C3 = 0.939 (CI:0.913-0.96); SP263 = 0.972 (CI:0.96-0.982); combined 22C3-SP263 = 0.909 (CI:0.874-0.938)]. Fleiss's kappa confirmed an almost perfect agreement among pathologists and assays: 22C3 = 0.938 (CI:0.857-1.018); SP263 = 0.972 (CI:0.890-1.052); combined 22C3-SP263 = 0.907 (CI:0.869-0.945). Perfect inter -rater agreement was reached considering IC. This study establishes the reliability of assessing CPS in mTNBC using either the 22C3 pharmDx, as employed in the KEYNOTE studies, or the VENTANA SP263 assay. Each assay must be used on its designated platform, namely the Dako for 22C3 pharmDx and the Ventana for VENTANA SP263. It is important to remark that CPS and IC identify different patient cohorts and, therefore, are not interchangeable.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 27
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tissue Selection for PD-L1 Testing in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)
    Dobritoiu, Florin
    Baltan, Adelina
    Chefani, Alina
    Billingham, Kim
    Chenard, Marie-Pierrette
    Vaziri, Reza
    Lacroix-Triki, Magali
    Waydelich, Anne
    Erb, Gilles
    Andersson, Emilia
    Canamero, Marta
    Toro, Paula
    Wedden, Sarah
    D'Arrigo, Corrado
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2022, 30 (08) : 549 - 556
  • [32] GBP5 Repression Suppresses the Metastatic Potential and PD-L1 Expression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Cheng, Shun-Wen
    Chen, Po-Chih
    Lin, Min-Hsuan
    Ger, Tzong-Rong
    Chiu, Hui-Wen
    Lin, Yuan-Feng
    BIOMEDICINES, 2021, 9 (04)
  • [33] External quality assessment for PD-L1 testing in triple negative breast cancer
    Warrick, N.
    Khalid, S.
    Dodson, A.
    Parry, S.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2020, 477 : S55 - S55
  • [34] JAK2 and PD-L1 Amplification Enhance the Dynamic Expression of PD-L1 in Triple-negative Breast Cancer
    Chen, Meixuan
    Pockaj, Barbara
    Andreozzi, Mariacarla
    Barrett, Michael T.
    Krishna, Sri
    Eaton, Seron
    Niu, Ruifang
    Anderson, Karen S.
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2018, 18 (05) : E1205 - E1215
  • [35] Expression of PD-L1 in triple-negative breast cancer based on different immunohistochemical antibodies
    Sun, Woo Young
    Lee, Yu Kyung
    Koo, Ja Seung
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2016, 14
  • [36] Expression of PD-L1 in triple-negative breast cancer based on different immunohistochemical antibodies
    Kim, H. -M.
    Sun, W. -Y.
    Lee, Y. -K.
    Koo, J. -S.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2016, 469 : S55 - S55
  • [37] Applicability of PD-L1 tests to tailor triple-negative breast cancer treatment in Brazil
    Kátia Ramos Moreira Leite
    Carlos Henrique Barrios
    Antônio Carlos Buzaid
    Débora Gagliato
    Helenice Gobbi
    Fernando Soares
    Surgical and Experimental Pathology, 4 (1)
  • [38] Expression of PD-L1 in triple-negative breast cancer based on different immunohistochemical antibodies
    Woo Young Sun
    Yu Kyung Lee
    Ja Seung Koo
    Journal of Translational Medicine, 14
  • [39] Multiomics analysis reveals the landscape of PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer
    Wang, Han
    Ding, Xiao-Hong
    Liu, Cheng-Lin
    Xiao, Yi
    Shui, Ruo-Hong
    Li, Yan-Ping
    Chen, Chen
    Yang, Wen-Tao
    Shao, Zhi-Ming
    Jiang, Yi-Zhou
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (09)
  • [40] PD-1/PD-L1 counterattack alliance: multiple strategies for treating triple-negative breast cancer
    Zhu, Haiying
    Du, Chengyong
    Yuan, Meng
    Fu, Peifen
    He, Qiaojun
    Yang, Bo
    Cao, Ji
    DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2020, 25 (09) : 1762 - 1771