Evaluation of Uterine Fibroid Vascularity Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:0
|
作者
Machado, Priscilla [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Allison [1 ]
Forsberg, Flemming [1 ]
Gonsalves, Carin F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Radiol, 132 South 10th St,Main 763M, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
来源
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2024年 / 50卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Uterine fibroids; Contrast -enhanced ultrasound; Ultrasound imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Vascularity; ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; RISK; EPIDEMIOLOGY; LEIOMYOMATA; AGENTS; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.11.012
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of the work described here was to assess uterine fibroid vascularity using contrast -enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: Forty women diagnosed with symptomatic uterine fibroids scheduled for uterine artery embolization (UAE) were enrolled in this institutional review board -approved study. Before UAE, participants underwent CEUS examination with an Aplio i800 scanner (Canon Medical Systems, Tustin, CA, USA) with curvilinear array (8C1). CEUS was performed using 2.0 mL of the ultrasound contrast agent Lumason (Bracco, Milan, Italy) administered intravenously. Digital CEUS clips were acquired and randomized offline, and fibroids were characterized as hyper- or hypovascular. MRI was used as reference standard for fibroid vascularity and compared with CEUS. Results were analyzed using McNemar's test. Results: Forty participants were enrolled in the trial. One patient did not proceed with the UAE procedure and one patient refused pre -procedure MRI because of claustrophobia. Therefore, 38 participants underwent CEUS and MRI examinations before UAE. Hypervascular fibroids were seen on MRI and CEUS in 24 and 26 participants, respectively. Hypovascular fibroids were seen with MRI and CEUS in 14 and 12 participants, respectively. Fibroids characterized as hypovascular in two participants by MRI were characterized as hypervascular by CEUS. CEUS and MRI findings were similar in 36 of 38 participants, corresponding to an accuracy of 95% (p = 0.62). Conclusion: Contrast -enhanced ultrasound can accurately assess uterine fibroid vascularity, serving as a potential alternative to MRI in determination of the vascularity of uterine fibroids.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 398
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing bladder urothelial carcinoma
    Fu, Wenyu
    Liu, Dan
    Xiong, Yongjiang
    Liu, Chuan
    Liu, Jiaji
    Yi, Xinping
    Zhao, Tao
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 55 (05) : 1073 - 1079
  • [2] The comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing bladder urothelial carcinoma
    Wenyu Fu
    Dan Liu
    Yongjiang Xiong
    Chuan Liu
    Jiaji Liu
    Xinping Yi
    Tao Zhao
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2023, 55 : 1073 - 1079
  • [3] CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND IN THE CHARACTERIZATION OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS TREATED BY ABLATION: COMPARISON WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
    Qu, Peng
    Yu, Xiaoling
    Liang, Ping
    Cheng, Zhigang
    Han, Zhiyu
    Liu, Fangyi
    Yu, Jie
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 39 (09): : 1571 - 1579
  • [4] Vascularity and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Frankhouser, David E.
    Dietze, Eric
    Mahabal, Ashish
    Seewaldt, Victoria L.
    FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 1
  • [5] Imaging of Carotid Plaque Neovascularization by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Cattaneo, Mattia
    Sun, Jie
    Staub, Daniel
    Xu, Dongxiang
    Gallino, Jeanne Marie
    Santini, Paolo
    Porretta, Alessandra P.
    Yuan, Chun
    Balu, Niranjan
    Arnold, Marcel
    Froio, Alberto
    Limoni, Costanzo
    Wyttenbach, Rolf
    Gallino, Augusto
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2019, 48 (3-6) : 140 - 148
  • [6] Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of the effects of sorafenib in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Munoz, Nina M.
    Minhaj, Adeeb A.
    Maldonado, Kiersten L.
    Kingsley, Charles, V
    Cortes, Andrea C.
    Taghavi, Houra
    Polak, Urszula
    Mitchell, Jennifer M.
    Ensor, Joe E.
    Bankson, James A.
    Rashid, Asif
    Avritscher, Rony
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 57 : 156 - 164
  • [7] Intestinal perfusion measurements with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging enterography: A comparison study
    Wilkens, R.
    Peters, D. A.
    Nielsen, A. H.
    Hovgaard, V. P.
    Glerup, H.
    Krogh, K.
    JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2016, 10 : S164 - S165
  • [8] Carotid plaque neovascularization - Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance blinded comparison
    Cattaneo, M.
    Sun, J.
    Staub, D.
    Xu, D.
    Gallino, J. M.
    Santini, P.
    Porretta, A. P.
    Yuan, C.
    Niranjan, B.
    Arnold, M.
    Limoni, C.
    Gallino, A.
    Cattaneo, M.
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2017, 43
  • [9] Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound with That of Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography and Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Furrer, Marc A.
    Spycher, Samuel C. J.
    Buettiker, Sophia M.
    Gross, Tobias
    Bosshard, Piet
    Thalmann, George N.
    Schneider, Marc P.
    Roth, Beat
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (04): : 464 - 473
  • [10] A direct comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection and prediction of aggressiveness
    Alexander D. J. Baur
    Julia Schwabe
    Julian Rogasch
    Andreas Maxeiner
    Tobias Penzkofer
    Carsten Stephan
    Marc Rudl
    Bernd Hamm
    Ernst-Michael Jung
    Thom Fischer
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 1949 - 1960