Implementation of a validated post-operative opioid nomogram into clinical gynecologic surgery practice: A quality improvement initiative

被引:0
|
作者
Zanolli, Nicole C. [1 ]
Lim, Stephanie [2 ]
Knechtle, William [3 ]
Feng, Kelvin [4 ]
Truong, Tracy [4 ]
Havrileskey, Laura J. [5 ]
Davidson, Brittany A. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Obstet Gynecol, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Duke Inst Hlth Innovat, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Durham, NC USA
[6] DUMC Box 3979, Durham, NC 27710 USA
来源
关键词
Post-operative pain management; Opioid use disorder; Quality improvement; Predictive modeling; PAIN; PRESCRIPTION; HYSTERECTOMY; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gore.2023.101260
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: The Gynecologic Oncology Postoperative Opioid use Predictive (GO-POP) calculator is a validated tool to provide evidence-based guidance on post-operative opioid prescribing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the implementation of GO-POP within an academic Gynecologic Oncology division.Methods: Two cohorts of patients (pre-implementation and post-implementation) who underwent surgery were compared with reference to GO-POP calculator implementation. All patients were included in the post implementation group, regardless of GO-POP calculator use. An additional expanded-implementation cohort was used to compare pain control between GO-POP users and non-GO-POP users prospectively. Wilcoxon rank sum tests or ANOVA for continuous variables and Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to categorical variables.Results: The median number of pills prescribed post-operatively decreased from 15 pills (Q1: 10, Q3: 20) to 10 pills (Q1: 8, Q3: 14.8) after implementation (p < 0.001). In the expanded-implementation cohort (293 patients), 41% patients were prescribed opioids using the GO-POP calculator. An overall median of 10 pills were prescribed with no difference by GO-POP calculator use (p = 0.26). Within the expanded-implementation cohort, refill requests (5% vs 9.2%; p = 0.26), clinician visits (0.8% vs 0.6%, p = 1), ED or urgent care visits (0% vs 2.3%, p = 0.15) and readmissions (0% vs 1.7%, p = 0.27) for pain did not differ between those prescribed opioids with and without the GO-POP calculator.Conclusions: A 33% reduction in post-operative opioid pills prescribed was seen following implementation of the GO-POP calculator into the Gynecologic Oncology division without increasing post-operative pain metrics or encounters for refill requests.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Acute management of Post-operative pain: A review of clinical practice
    Macpherson, R.
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2018, 37 : 10 - 10
  • [32] Role of pre-operative serum magnesium (Mg) concentration on post-operative pain intensity and opioid usage in gynecologic
    Azari, Laleh
    Stelts, Sundae
    Santoso, Joseph T.
    Kocak, Mehmet
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [33] Determination of the Greek clinical practice for the management of post-operative pain
    Yfantopoulos, J.
    Papagiannopoulou, V.
    Papanikolaou, S.
    ARCHIVES OF HELLENIC MEDICINE, 2010, 27 (04): : 650 - 661
  • [34] Documentation of Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting in Routine Clinical Practice
    Franck, M.
    Radtke, F. M.
    Apfel, C. C.
    Kuhly, R.
    Baumeyer, A.
    Brandt, C.
    Wernecke, K. D.
    Spies, C. D.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 38 (03) : 1034 - 1041
  • [35] Predictors of Post-operative Pain and Opioid Consumption in Patients Undergoing Liver Surgery
    R. Behman
    S. Cleary
    P. McHardy
    A. Kiss
    J. Sawyer
    S. S. J. Ladak
    S. A. McCluskey
    C. Srinivas
    J. Katz
    N. Coburn
    C. Law
    A. C. Wei
    P. Greig
    J. Hallet
    H. Clarke
    P. J. Karanicolas
    World Journal of Surgery, 2019, 43 : 2579 - 2586
  • [36] Predictors of Post-operative Pain and Opioid Consumption in Patients Undergoing Liver Surgery
    Behman, R.
    Cleary, S.
    McHardy, P.
    Kiss, A.
    Sawyer, J.
    Ladak, S. S. J.
    McCluskey, S. A.
    Srinivas, C.
    Katz, J.
    Coburn, N.
    Law, C.
    Wei, A. C.
    Greig, P.
    Hallet, J.
    Clarke, H.
    Karanicolas, P. J.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 43 (10) : 2579 - 2586
  • [37] Implementation and evaluation of a national quality improvement initiative in cancer surgery
    Arnaout, Angel
    Mukhi, Shaheena
    Brehaut, Jamie
    Davidson, Sarah
    Fung, Michael Fung Kee
    Hebbard, Pamela
    Hillis, Christopher
    Leonard, Robyn
    Mack, Lloyd A.
    Mathieson, Alex
    Presseau, Justin
    Schaeffer, David
    Seely, Andrew
    Stuart, Gavin
    Tesch, Marvin
    Westhuizen, Nicholas
    Earle, Craig
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [38] Implementation and adaptation of clinical quality improvement opioid measures
    Hersey, Catherine
    Shoemaker-Hunt, Sarah
    Parchman, Michael
    Childs, Ellen
    Le, John
    Sargent, Wesley
    HEALTHCARE-THE JOURNAL OF DELIVERY SCIENCE AND INNOVATION, 2024, 12 (04):
  • [39] The impact of chest physiotherapy on post-operative recovery from open liver surgery: A quality improvement project
    Tharmapathy, Thaarabi
    Edwards, Tara
    Sundaravadanan, Senthil
    Sethi, Pulkit
    Rees, Myrddin
    Welsh, Fenella
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [40] Preventable failures in post-operative care: a potential target for quality improvement
    Symons, N. R. A.
    Almoudaris, A.
    Nagpal, K.
    Vincent, C. A.
    Moorthy, K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 : 4 - 4